On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 8:49 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 08:20:52PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 10. 05. 20 18:37, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > > On Sun, 10 May 2020, Barry Scott wrote:
> > >
> > > > I know that python2 is a dead language, but I have a need to use
> > > > so
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:42 AM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> ## GitForge Updates
> * We are tracking our progress here (nothing new added yet, fyi)
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Git_forge_update
> * And the council are tracking the community issues in this ticket
> https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/t
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:37 PM James Cassell
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020, at 4:40 AM, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > # CPE Weekly: 2020-05-11
> > ---
> > title: CPE Weekly status email
> > tags: CPE Weekly, email
> > ---
> [snip]
> >
> > Source: https://hackmd.io/8iV7PilARSG68Tqv8CzKOQ
> >
>
> On
This past weekend I finally decided to jump off the cliff and attempt
to re-launch the Java SIG. It seems there's some interest in keeping
the Java stack maintained, it's just not focused or organized right
now.
What we did when starting the Stewardship SIG seems to have worked out
pretty well, so
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> The wiki is not that bad actually. The links to guidelines and package
> lists are still useful. Even the packaging wishlist is mostly up to
> date since we didn't manage to touch most of the items ;)
> So maybe just nuke the out
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:15 AM Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 09:50:30 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > >
> > > Yep, count me in.
> >
> > Thanks. I'll get your memberships set up. :)
>
> Thank you for starting this off, and thank yo
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:34 PM Ty Young wrote:
> Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to you. I suppose
> I should have been more clear there. Sorry for any confusion, it was
> aimed at the Fedora project as a whole as this is a Fedora issue.
I am aware that Arch is just packag
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 2:03 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> A little while ago we have received the request on the infra issue tracker to
> remove all maintainers of retired packages [1].
>
> So today I decided to look at what this would look like and wrote a script
>
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:02 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> Good luck with that! As someone that has been part of the Java SIG since day
> 0 I wish you make Fedora even better workstation for Java developer than we
> ever managed.
Thank you! You're welcome to (re-)join the effort, we'd be luck
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:34 PM Alex Scheel wrote:
>
> Obviously count us in, Fabio :-)
*Us* means the three guys from the Dogtag PKI team? :)
> Do we need a two-step bootstrap process? A first (offline) step where we run
> gradle-wrapper and fetch all the resources, put all online dependencies
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 5:43 PM Markku Korkeala wrote:
> Great, really appreciate your work.
Thank you!
> Count me in! I'm relatively new to fedora and rpm packaging, but got ~20
> years of working with Java and my packages depends on the Java
> ecosystem. FAS account: korkeala.
>
> Markku.
Gre
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 6:17 PM Igor Raits
wrote:
> Count me in! I don't think I can help much, but at least can give some
> suggestions.
>
> > Let's make this happen.
>
> Good luck, Fabio!
Thanks! Every bit of help counts.
You should now be all set with FAS group / pagure project / mailing
list
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 3:14 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Why are we still doing builds for armv7l in koji?
>
> I see that it is not represented on https://alt.fedoraproject.org/alt/
> so I presume we no longer support installing this architecture. Is it
> really only used for multilib,
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:38 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:46 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > So, if you're interested, please consider joining this group effort.
> > I'll get new members set up with the FAS group / pagure project / mailing
&g
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:59 PM Ty Young wrote:
> As someone who has been burned due to Fedora's goody little two shoes
> policies, I'd kindly ask that Fedora take a hike and not package the
> software at all.
I find it kind of ironic that this is exactly what happened, but you
seem not to be aw
Hi all,
I have just orphaned apache-commons-vfs. The package is working and
up-to-date, but the Stewardship SIG no longer requires it. Only one
fedora package still depends on it in rawhide -
apache-commons-configuration - which is itself not required by
anything in rawhide, and which already has
Good $LOCAL_TIME_OF_DAY,
I've been working on experimental support for automatically generating
BuildRequires for maven-based Java projects, and it's now available
for testing in rawhide (and in fedora 32, for local testing).
There's no "macro support" for this yet, because it's still
work-in-pro
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 3:34 PM Ty Young wrote:
> On 5/18/20 7:35 AM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
> My software didn't magically break just for Fedora because of some bug
> in my software. It broke because Fedora decided they wanted to do
> something nearly no Linux distro does... something t
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:13 AM Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 18:45:12 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 6:17 PM Igor Raits
> > wrote:
> > > Count me in! I don't think I can help much, but at least can give some
> > &
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:33 AM Guido Aulisi wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm getting some strange errors from some packages built for f32 with
> gcc 10.0 [0].
> Building with g++ 10.1 ardourd5 seems fine...
>
> It seems GCC 10.0 had some bugs that could be discovered only at
> runtime. Did you have any simi
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:19 AM Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 10:44:05 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> >
> > Good Morning!
> >
> > We were planning to discuss this from the Stewardship SIG point of
> > view during today's m
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:18 AM Felix Schwarz
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> it seems it is possible to use a -sig group as default bugzilla assignee but I
> don't know how to do it.
>
> If I go to pagure (src.fedoraproject.org) I can edit the bugzilla assignee but
> using "@certbot-sig" (or "certbot-sig") d
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:28 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
> Next time FESCo should forbid gcc updates to unreleased versions in
> branched Fedora releases.
>
> Now we need a new mass rebuild in Fedora 32 with fixed gcc 10.1.1 version.
As I wrote in my direct response to Guido, doing a mass
On Tue, May 19, 2020, 15:40 Jiri Vanek wrote:
> Hello!
>
> An raw schedule of mass rebuilds was added to the Java11 feature list:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#Expected_schedule
>
> You can expect second copr-based mass rebuild, in 1st June 2020. Please
> try to fix your package
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedorapro
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 8:08 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:40:50AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:28 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > wrote:
> > > Next time FESCo should forbid gcc updates to unreleased versio
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:51 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 8:39 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> >
> > In rawhide the ceph ceph-test subpackage is deriving a Requires: for
> > $subject, and even with gmock and gtest installed the requires is not
> > satisfied.
> >
> > And the gtest
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:56 PM Tom Callaway wrote:
>
> I've just kicked off new builds for texlive and texlive-base for TeXLive 2020
> in rawhide. Hopefully, everything that depends on them will continue to work,
> but if you notice any new issues generating docs (or any missing components
>
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 2:17 PM Guido Aulisi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the new package review tickets page [0] was last updated on 2020-04-06.
> New tickets are not displayed, I made a new review request on April 19
> and it never appeared on that page
>
> Is there anything not working on auto updating t
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 9:31 PM Vascom wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> Some packages has string
> ...
> And appstream-util validate-relax show error
> ? tag-invalid : stock icon is not valid
>
> There exist bugreport one year old!
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584944
>
>
> Please
On Tue, May 26, 2020, 12:51 Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild
> > in a
> > side tag.
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9
> >
> > If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9"
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 9:47 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Python packages built with Python < 3.8.0b4 have invalid bytecode version,
> because the version was updated in 3.8.0b4.
>
> To see why this is a problem, follow the bugreport:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748018
>
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:07 AM Brian (bex) Exelbierd
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:05 AM Pavel Valena wrote:
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Jun Aruga"
>> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>> >
>> > Cc: "Fedora Infrastructure"
>> > Sent: Monday, Septe
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 7:33 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 05:31:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > ○ Every changes to dist-git is done via pull-requests
> > Erm, no thank you. Pull requests are a terrible workflow.
>
> It's definitely the winning workflow in the op
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 9:11 PM Dinesh Prasanth Moluguwan
Krishnamoorthy wrote:
>
> Hello everyone!
>
> We, the Dogtag PKI team, would like to revive the jboss-logging-tools
> which was retired as part of the Fedora orphaning process.
>
> This package is a direct dependency for dogtag-pki project,
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>
> Le jeu. 3 oct. 2019 à 21:40, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
> >
> > On Friday, September 27, 2019 6:29:54 PM CEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 12:06 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:03 PM Sérgio Bast
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 11:43 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> git push — requires an ssh key (cached)
> fedpkg build — requires a kerberos ticket (cached)
> fedpkg override – asks for a password every damn time
>
> What's so special about buildroot overrides? Can we make
> them be
Hi everybody,
To provide a bit of context: Syncthing ships unit files for both
system services and user services, where the system service can be
instantiated with the $USER the service should run as. The user
service obviously doesn't need this argument, but will only run when
the user is logged
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 5:54 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:17:37PM +0200, Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> Thanks for your words, I appreciate the support on the idea.
>
> > 1. Creating new packages has become (more of) a pain since the
> > retirement of pkgdb2. I know I keep com
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019, 02:17 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > It goes like this:
> >
> > - master and f31 are at the same commit "aa"
> > - I push a change only possible in rawhide, commit "bb" to master
> > (it includes release bump and changelog entry)
> > - a commi
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 9:32 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 04. 10. 19 16:57, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Right now, there are two conflicting requirements in Fedora Modularity
> > that we need to resolve.
> >
> > 1. Once a user has selected a stream, updates should follow that
> > stream and not i
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019, 15:07 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Couple of my updates have e-mailed me $subj. Is it something to worry
> about?
>
I got this too for a lot of my updates, just a few hours ago. I assumed it
was caused by some kind of server glitch, maybe related to the current koji
outage.
Fabio
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 00:44 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> One of the tedious things I do as a package maintainer is re-building
> all dependent packages with a new version of a package. My current work
> flow is:
>
> - create a testing copr
> - build the new package there
> - Figure out what packages
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 8:02 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 09:31:55PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be easier if the "default stream" would just behave like
> > a regular package?
>
> Part of the "hybrid modularity" proposal was that the default stream could
> _l
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, 23:18 Langdon White wrote:
> Minutes:
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-3/2019-10-08/modularity.2019-10-08-15.08.html
> Minutes (text):
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-3/2019-10-08/modularity.2019-10-08-15.08.txt
> Log:
> https://meetbot.fe
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019, 12:29 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 04. 10. 19 21:31, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 04. 10. 19 16:57, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> Right now, there are two conflicting requirements in Fedora Modularity
> >> that we need to resolve.
> >>
> >> 1. Once a user has selected a stream, upd
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 10:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:01:45PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 13. 10. 19 19:38, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Ben Rosser wrote:
> > > > Before things are rolled out further, I'd like to see some policies
> > > > agreed upon for what modula
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:43 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:13 AM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday, October 13, 2019 11:42:41 PM MST Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 9:00 AM John M. Harris Jr
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Wednesda
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019, 12:47 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:02:46PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > > You seem to totally miss the point - there is no one even trying to
> ship
> > > Maven as a traditional package so what should we do give up o
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:50 AM Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>
> On ti, 15 loka 2019, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> >On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 9:40:31 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> And to be fair, while it is a hard problem to solve, it's a worthy
> >> one. It makes sense and if done well, could real
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 9:39 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:03:02PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 2:56 PM Matthew Miller
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 01:32:49PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > remove it" or some
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 9:33 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:05:43PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> > Realistically, I believe that default streams themselves are something we
> > should avoid, if the cost is low, and it is. There are many users,
> > probably the vast ma
Hello Packagers,
As some of you might not have been aware, the Stewardship SIG has been
busy keeping the Java stack in fedora alive and working. We're now
left with 0 build failures on all current branches of fedora for our
235 packages, and no open FTBFS / FTI or known security issues.
We've als
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 11:09 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 02:48:13PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 08:31:10AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > This is not true. It should be *possible* to have a fully modularized
> > > distribut
Hello packagers,
I have identified that the Stewardship SIG owned some packages that
have now become leaf packages in fedora, since their last dependent
packages were recently removed or updated to no longer require them.
Because there's no point in maintaining leaf packages that aren't
useful on
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 15:17 Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 01:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 09:30:52PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > > If I were to start from scratch on this, I would look at the simplest
> > > solution I
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for some packages, and none of our other packages depend
on these anymore. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of
them, preferably someone who actively uses them or maintains a package
that depe
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 12:47 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hello packagers,
>
> I have identified that the Stewardship SIG owned some packages that
> have now become leaf packages in fedora, since their last dependent
> packages were recently removed or updated to no l
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 3:47 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 9:39 AM Daniel Walsh wrote:
> >
> > How do I go about removing packages from Fedora Distro. I want to drop
> > oci-systemd-hook and oci-register-machine? I would love to remove them
> > from f31 but it might be too l
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:52 AM Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Am 25.10.19 um 10:36 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
> > On 25. 10. 19 10:31, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> >> a) closing a bug for any reason, should clear the flag. it does not.
> >
> > It's not that simple. Sometimes, it makes sense to clear, sometimes
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 5:20 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hello Packagers,
>
> As some of you might not have been aware, the Stewardship SIG has been
> busy keeping the Java stack in fedora alive and working. We're now
> left with 0 build failures on all current branches
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:30 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 8:47 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 25. 10. 19 19:30, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Currently default Java runtime in Fedora is OpenJDK 8. This is not the
> > > latest OpenJDK packaged, but
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:02 PM J. Scheurich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989
It's usually enough to ask the original reviewer to unset and set the
"fedora-review: +" flag if the package
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:15 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:02 PM J. Scheurich wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 13:08 Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:27 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> > > > E.g. would the dependent OpenJDK 8 packages still build in stable
> releases if
> > > > this change is done globally and for example if Ur
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 15:22 Felix Schwarz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> somehow I'm unable to create a new update for my new package
> "python-cssselect2" (F31) and I'd like to know why.
>
> When I go to https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/new and I enter
> "python-cssselect2" in the "packages" field, bod
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 15:54 Jiri Vanek wrote:
> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least
> for some more time...
>
Would you care to elaborate why?
Fabio
>
> On 10/25/19 8:47 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 25. 10. 19 19:30, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >> Hello,
>
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 19:07 Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 15:59:27 +0200, you wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 03:53:28PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least
> for some more time...
> >
> > Any reasons? Default
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 8:21 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:16 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for this very useful summary.
> >
> > One general problem with the thinking behind this is that it applies much
> > more
> > to CentOS o
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for some packages, and none of our other packages depend
on these anymore. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of
them, preferably someone who actively uses them or maintains a package
that depe
Hi everybody,
I just orphaned rubygem-minitest-reporters, because It's no longer
required by any of my other ruby packages. It's up to date with the
newest upstream release.
Usually, it can be removed from a package's test suite with a simple
patch / sed, since it only affects terminal output and
Hi everybody,
It looks like the recent shuffling around of header / pkgconfig / etc.
files between mesa and libglvnd introduced some regressions. At least
a few packages are failing to build in rawhide since those changes
were made, including mutter (probably that's important?) and mutter328
(the
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:13 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> See https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/870
So you mean to say that this has to be "fixed" in each individual
package, from fedora f32 forward?
Fabio
> ___
> devel mailing list --
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 2:44 PM Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 13:52:00 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > gstreamer was retired
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gstreamer/c/21fd6753e6c7f1fa1dee1045596b25fdb8c71f37?branch=f31
> >
> > the commit was reverted
> > https://src.fedor
Hi everybody,
It looks like yesterday, koji stopped blocking and removing retired
packages from the f32 tag, or at least, it stopped doing so reliably.
The following packages have been retired a day ago, but today they are
all still tagged into f32, and were part of two composes after they
were "
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 05. 11. 19 15:33, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > It looks like yesterday, koji stopped blocking and removing retired
> > packages from the f32 tag, or at least, it stopped doing so reliably.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 8:15 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 01:08:23PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > I think I mentioned that it would be possible, as OpenPKG actually
> > worked this way.
> >
> > The key for this would be improving the user-experience with
> > interacting with
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 09:25 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 06. 11. 19 23:10, Randy Barlow wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:32 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> Is there any good way to get notified about this sort of problems in
> >> timely manner prior to the update being pushed? This is currently not
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:14 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 07. 11. 19 9:55, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 09:25 Miro Hrončok > <mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 06. 11. 19 23:10, Randy Barlow wrote:
> > > On
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 6:01 PM Charalampos Stratakis
wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Vít Ondruch"
> > Cc: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 10:01:47 AM
> > Subject: Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Build Python 3 to
> > statically l
Hi everybody,
Following the policy for non-responsive package maintainers [0], I'm
asking here if anybody knows how to contact rfenkhuber. Roman, if
you're still interested in maintaining your packages, please respond.
Some of his packages are broken on fedora 31+ due to retired Java
dependencies
Hi everybody,
Following the policy for non-responsive package maintainers [0], I'm
asking here if anybody knows how to contact weli. Weinan, if you're
still interested in maintaining your packages, please respond.
Some of his packages are broken on fedora 31+ due to retired Java
dependencies, and
Hi everybody,
Following the policy for non-responsive package maintainers [0], I'm
asking here if anybody knows how to contact dwalluck. David, if you're
reading this, and are still interested in maintaining hamcrest, please
respond.
His one package (hamcrest) is pretty outdated, and this is star
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails
> are not sent anymore even for Rawhide. This is big loss.
If you think that the weekly "broken dependencies" reports were
useful, I could set that up again.
After all, I
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 11:57 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 10. 11. 19 18:06, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >> I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails
> >> a
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 5:02 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 4:24 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > >
> > &
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 10:24 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >
> > > I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" em
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:10 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hello packagers,
>
> The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
> maintenance for some packages, and none of our other packages depend
> on these anymore. So, we're looking for someone to tak
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019, 15:09 Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 11. 11. 19 v 14:39 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> > David Timms wrote:
> >> Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1.
> > Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository.
> >
> >> The normal Fedora wxGTK3
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:14 AM J. Scheurich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When i try to use "fedpkg co vcglib", i get
>
> $ fedpkg co vcglib
> Cloning into 'vcglib'...
> muft...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey).
> fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
>
> Please make sure you h
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:03 PM J. Scheurich wrote:
>
> Hi,
> >> When i try to use "fedpkg co vcglib", i get
> >>
> >> $ fedpkg co vcglib
> >> Cloning into 'vcglib'...
> >> muft...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey).
> >> fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
> >>
> >>
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Felix Schwarz
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> recently I took thunderbird-enigmail to fix some CVEs + unbreak the package.
> With the help of two Fedora users I updated the package + improved the spec
> file (I hope :-).
>
> Now I wanted to push out an update but taskotron comp
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:44 PM Felix Schwarz
wrote:
>
> Hi Fabio,
>
> Am 12.11.19 um 13:37 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
> > There's a specific section about this issue in the Packaging Guidelines:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_noar
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 6:18 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:17 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>
>> Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>> > So people would prefer no packages at all over packages in modules?
>>
>> I see 2 reasons so far why some packages are module-only:
>> 1. be
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:04 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 6:18 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:17 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >>
> >> Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >>
Hi everybody,
Following the policy for non-responsive package maintainers [0], I'm
asking here if anybody knows how to contact huwang. Hui, if you're
still interested in maintaining your packages, please respond.
Some of their packages are broken on fedora 31+ due to retired Java
dependencies, an
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 4:57 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello, in this thread (Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Modules in
> Non-Modular Buildroot)
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JNTMUOBZHHCEOV7KS7MRNOBO6VGGT7RX/
>
> I've asked whether
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 3:31 PM Joe Orton wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 12:44:52PM +0100, Miro Hroncok wrote:
> > Where is the end-user benefit with the modular default stream? I don't see
> > it either, sorry.
Let me offer a second opinion (coming from some first-hand experience) here:
> I
On Sat, Nov 16, 2019, 06:19 J. Scheurich wrote:
> Hi
> > I want to approve the review request of vimvi-qt, but this is my
> first
> > offical review 8-(
> You need to set fedora-review+ flag. Click on "Show advanced fields"
> near
> the top of the bug, and flags should be visib
Hi everybody,
After the latest updates have hit rawhide, the two Java packages in
$SUBJECT are no longer (build)required by any package in fedora, so
there's not really any reason to keep them - which is why I've just
orphaned them. I expect them to get retired in 6 weeks.
Fabio
_
101 - 200 of 1943 matches
Mail list logo
