On 5/17/20 12:00 AM, David Schwörer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am going to update gloox to the newest version.
>
> I am going to build in the side tag f33-build-side-23466
>
> 0ad and uwsgi need to be rebuild.
>
> $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires gloox-devel --repo=rawhide-sou
On 5/31/20 12:31 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 31.05.2020, 11:49 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser:
>> Am Sonntag, den 31.05.2020, 11:29 +0200 schrieb David Schwörer:
>>> If a proven packager could rebuild 0ad and uwsgi and submit
On 6/5/20 1:23 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 05.06.2020 12:50, Igor Raits wrote:
>> It does not work in some cases even today anyway.
>
> Okay, then the second point - zram will will cause a huge memory
> fragmentation and significantly decrease overall performance.
If you say this is
On 7/8/20 11:15 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>> * disk access is literally O(1) slower than RAM access
> This is just false, and you can prove that on your own system using only
> `dd`.
> In fact, if your system is newer than my Lenovo ThinkPad X200 Tablet, you'll
> probably have even fast
On 7/10/20 11:12 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Thursday, July 9, 2020 2:19:27 PM MST Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
>> On 7/9/20 8:44 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>
>>> Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
>>>
* disk access is literally O(1) slower than RAM access
>>>
>>> This notatio
On 4/5/20 6:06 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On 04/04/20 19:23, David S wrote:
>> On 4/4/20 4:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> `MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundials-5.2.0` [3] are coming
>>> on Rawhide; these updates will need rebuilds of dependent packages:
>>>
>> [:snip
On 4/14/20 11:06 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> orangefs orphan 1
> weeks ago
I took orangefs and rebuild it.
However I am not able to close or take the FTBFS bug [1]
The documentation only says I should take the bug, but not how [2]
I also took git-c
On 4/16/20 10:39 AM, Dave Love wrote:
> David Schwörer writes:
>
>> On 4/14/20 11:06 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>> orangefs orphan 1
>>> weeks ago
>>
>> I took orangefs and rebuild it.
>> However
On 4/22/20 9:55 PM, Jun Aruga wrote:
Hi,
Could anyone swap the review?
Review Request: bowtie2 - A read aligner for genome sequencing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824348
I can take it.
bowtie2 [1] is C++ software for genome analysis.It can be also used
for COVID-19 analysis
Hi,
Does anybody know how to contact Pavel Alexeev (fas: hubbitus) ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829117
Last comment on the most recent ticket on bugzilla:
#1737349 2019-09-08 pahan
#1215344 2016-01-01 pahan
#1200038 2015-10-04 pahan
#1130101 2014-09-09 pahan
List o
Hi,
I am going to update gloox to the newest version.
I am going to build in the side tag f33-build-side-23466
0ad and uwsgi need to be rebuild.
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires gloox-devel --repo=rawhide-source
0ad-0:0.0.23b-13.fc33.src
uwsgi-0:2.0.18-8.fc33.src
Cheers,
David
__
On 5/22/20 2:26 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Scratch build:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44816285
My initial try of rebuilding in copr for easier testing failed.
I had to add
export OMPI_MCA_rmaps_base_oversubscribe=yes
to the %check section, to get it working on copr.
Wo
As this topic comes up, I think the issue is more related to cases where
upstream is not willing to support FHS installation. PETSc [1] is one
case, openfoam [2] is another example which is currently under review
[3]. The issue is that derived projects get used to this case of
installation, which t
On 1/7/20 11:07 AM, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 09:47 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 02:53:13PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 7:09 pm, Lennart Poettering
>>> wrote:
- facebook is working on making oomd somethi
On 2/4/20 9:32 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 05:22:55PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
>> Le 2020-02-03 17:11, David Cantrell a écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> We want input from the community on what the main goal should be and
>>> prioritize the rest. For exa
Hi all,
My name is David Schwörer, and I am a PhD Student in Ireland and have
been using Fedora for many years, and would like to contribute to Fedora.
I am one of the upstream developers of BOUT++, a library to write fluid
and plasma simulations in curvilinear geometry. BOUT++ is a C++ library
> == Benefit to Fedora ==
>
> java maintainers will finally some free time... No kidding -
> maintenance and *certification* of so much supported JDKs on so much
> Fedora versions is brutal. By building once, and repack, we will
> regain cycles to continue support Fedora with all LTS and one ST
> Seems a bit disappointing. I’ve been searching but cannot find any
> info on configuring docker to use Fedora’s repo so I could just ignore
> the issue altogether. :)
You should be able to use a full url:
podman pull registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide
podman pull quay.io/fedora/fedora:r
> However, xmvn-connector-ivy mock builds in rawhide just fine.
Note that this is an old mail from Miro, in his most recent FTBFS announcement
the package isn't listed anymore as it has been fixed in the mean time.
Before that, there was no successful build since f36.
Hope that helps
__
MUSIC is an independent package, that just happens to fail to build from source
after a new openmpi has been landed. bout++ is affected as well, and I would be
unhappy if it would be obsoleted by openmpi.
I think having more time to adapt dependent packages would have been helpful,
as I do not
On 8/5/20 8:45 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to rebuild espresso to adapt to the recent cmake changes,
> when doing this I hit
> https://github.com/espressomd/espresso/issues/3396, which prevents us
> from compiling espresso with -lto, so I set _lto_cflags to %{nil},
> which
On 1/13/21 7:40 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> bout++ package is still missing. Please, rebuild it.
>
Hi, I thought orion did rebuild it?
If I list the builds, bout++ is shown:
koji list-tagged --latest f34-build-side-35531
Build Tag Built
Sorry, I missed the mail. I have rebuild bout++ now
On 3/19/21 12:21 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> This update is still pending.
>
> On 24/02/21 20:07, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
>> Side-tag is ready for building the related dependencies:
>> f35-build-side-37890
>>
>> On 22/02/21
On 8/18/21 10:27 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 16. 08. 21 9:00, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> On 16. 08. 21 0:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 11:43:48AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 08. 21 18:19, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> It makes me wonder if we should consider letting 32bit ar
24 matches
Mail list logo
