even with gcc -g -O0

I'm trying to debug an issue for the upstream author of ocp and am running into an issue where gdb is showing "" for variables even though I've compiled the program with gcc -g -O0. Are there any gcc/gdb gurus who can help? Compiler excerpts: gcc -g -O0 -fPIC -Wall -I.././ -I.././gnulib kic

Re: even with gcc -g -O0

On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:34:19AM +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > playmonoi16 (dst=0x76ddc0, len=, > >    ch=) at mixasm.c:1746 > > Sorry for

Re: [SPF:fail] Re: even with gcc -g -O0

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:18:07PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 07:18:26 +0100, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > I'm trying to debug an issue for the upstream author of ocp and am > > running into an issue where gdb is showing "" for > > var

Re: systemd and changes

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:12:28PM +0100, Mark Chappell wrote: > On 26/08/2010, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > Just to be clear.. its the clickity nature of the initial system wide > > configuration that is the barrier for you? if you had a reasonable > > non-clickity way to add a system wide on-boot act

Koji crashes Google Chromium [was Rawhide Koji borked??]

On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 05:28:47PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > Randall Berry wrote, at 09/05/2010 05:06 PM +9:00: > > 1) https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2447749 > > 2) https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2447750&name=root.log These two URLs crash Google Chromiu

Re: Koji crashes Google Chromium [was Rawhide Koji borked??]

On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 08:34:18AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 05:28:47PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > > Randall Berry wrote, at 09/05/2010 05:06 PM +9:00: > > > 1) https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2447749 >

Re: ltsp-5.2.4-5.rpm's ready for testing (i686 & x86_64)

Would you care to create a repo on repos.fedorapeople.org? http://repos.fedorapeople.org/ On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:58:16AM +0100, Gavin Spurgeon wrote: > The New .rpm's are still located on my www server, and to make things a > little easier I have also made a Yum Repo for both archs as well. >

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 01:21:29PM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > What I am trying to say is, a redesign of an interface _usually_ have > valid reasons. Those users who don't want their menu items moving > around want to live like automated machines. Forbidding such changes > promotes lazyness. > >

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 02:47:23PM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On 10/1/10 10:41 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > >> How would you like it if you drove into work, parked your car, and > >> when you went out to your c

Re: Git commit in all available branches

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:23:24AM +1000, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:07:17 +1000 > > Jeff Fearn wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >>> On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:04 +0400 > >>> "Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)" wrot

Re: Git commit in all available branches

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:19:42PM +1000, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:32:15AM +1000, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > > > >> What do you mean "leave it alone"? The people using it WANT the changes. > >> Why are you telling them how they can use their system?

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 08:06:59AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/12/10 7:20 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:16:49PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > >> The only way to accomplish this without actually removing

Re: Bug in curl makes Fedora ftp:// URL installations fail with some mirrors

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 02:03:20PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > Yes, indeed, it seems more likely a bug in the FTP server (pure-ftpd), > but it would be very nice to have a workaround in curl or in anaconda for > it.. Why not fix the the problem at the source? > I'm sure ftp.funet.fi is not th

Re: Fwd: Rapid DHCP

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:30:30PM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 07/30/2011 06:49 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > What's unique about the method described there is that the Mac > > configures the interface with the same IP address it previously had if > > the lease is still valid, while NetworkMan

Re: Fwd: Rapid DHCP

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 05:25:49PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 13:43 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Bill McGonigle > > wrote: > > > On 08/03/2011 01:19 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > >> The Ubuntu NM maintainer has posted a WIP patch that

Re: manually fixing IPs

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 03:58:06PM +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > Hi. > > On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:48:14 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote > > NM supports static IPs these days. So I think that rather than > > hacking around NM, you should just fix the IP inside NM's > > configuration and have NM work FOR y

Re: manually fixing IPs

On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:20:03AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/31/2011 07:28 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > > domainname is only used for NIS, > Hmm, this doesn't match with my understanding. Doma

Re: net-tools must die

On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 09:33:52PM +, Ben Boeckel wrote: > Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > > At the same time, we believe that most packages using net-tools should > > be patched to use iproute instead, while others can continue using the > > wrappers for some time. The ifupdown package is obvious

Re: ipv6 tools + ipv4 tools fusion.

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 02:59:09AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > because the same hostname can have A and AAA records > and the people commonly use ping (sysadmins) must be > able to decide what they will test? Use -4 -or -6 parameters if you care to force one vs. the other. > most times you ping

Re: wireless-tools/net-tools are DEPRECATED

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:30:02PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > Looking at the code, the 4-second delay is only used when the device is > actually connected to something. State 3 == DISCONNECTED, state 2 == > UNAVAILABLE, so it's performing as expected here. Were there actually > an IP address as

Re: Potentially Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Charles A. Anderson

On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 01:32:26PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > As more and more bugzapper F13 EOL mails continue to come in, I've had a look > at some grab samples and have run into multiple bug reports for package "ocp" > not having been responded to since 2010: > > https://admin.fedoraproje

Re: Heads up: impending IPv6 Test Day

On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:40:10PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Is there an easy way I can set up IPv6 and a handful of machines on my > LAN for testing, without requiring any IPv6 internet connection or an > IPv6 assigned prefix? Yes, every system automatically chooses a link-local address.

how to push to stable?

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocp-0.1.20-8.fc15 bodhi says of my update: bodhi - 2011-06-10 05:03:46 This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes But clicking the "mark as stable" button says: This update has not yet met the mini

Re: how to push to stable?

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 08:26:03AM +0100, José Matos wrote: > On Monday 13 June 2011 08:09:48 Honza Horak wrote: > > I think bodhi behaves correctly, but this auto-generated message is a > > failure, while according https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy a > > non critical package must spe

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-6-27)

> * #531 Orphaned package ownership claiming clarification (sgallagh, > 17:40:47) > * AGREED: Policy will change to ""If a package is in orphan state in > pkgdb, feel free to take it and revivie it, no re-review needed. If > it's depreciated, you must re-review and get admins to unbl

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:28:59PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan: fping > mon requires fping = 2.4b2-11.fc15 > nagios-plugins requires /usr/sbin/fping > nagios-plugins-fping requires /usr/sbin/fping > smokeping requires fping = 2.4b2-11.fc15 > wifiroamd requires fping =

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages in F-16

> Orphan midisport-firmware I own hardware that uses this. Taken. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages in F-16

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 07:08:20PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 06:47:12PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > > Orphan midisport-firmware > > > > I own hardware that uses this. Taken. > > you'll want to take its dependancy too 'f

Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørd al is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners

On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:15:41AM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > * flac123 -- Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files Taken. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Notice: dnssec-conf updates in Fedora 11 and 12

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 01:34:51PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > > The problem occurs in these packages: > > > > dnssec-conf-1.21-3.fc11 > > dnssec-conf-1.21-7.fc12 > > > > Has this question been asked of anyone yet: > > Why did this update bypass updates-te

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:26:54PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:16:42PM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote: > configuration can be in xorg.conf or in /etc/xorg.conf.d/. Can it be /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ instead please? It would suck to have to look in two different places, /

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:25:24PM +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote: > 2010/2/16 Chuck Anderson : > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:26:54PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:16:42PM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote: > >> configuration can be in xorg.

Re: hdparm -B for netbooks

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:34:54PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:18:21PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:10:03PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > What is the state of this - is some package responsible for this or is it >

Re: spin kickstart/minimization cleanups

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:11:23PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > - system-config-network > + system-config-network Thank you :-) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Moving libcrypto.so.* back to /lib

On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:17:25AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > So I got convinced that libcrypto.so.* should be moved back to /lib in > the https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559953 The libssl.so.* > will stay in /usr/lib though. > > I will do that change in F14 packages. Till Maas asked m

Re: Some Ideas About Fedora 14 Media

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:06:25PM +0800, Liang Suilong wrote: > Better experience: Live/Install Hybrid DVD > Looking at install DVD, it looks too old. To add a Livesystem on DVD media > can improve user experience. However, unlike Anaconda on install media, > Anaconda on live system can not load a

Re: 2.6.41.2-1.fc15.x86_64: missing bridge support?

On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 02:49:26PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > I just ran into this in Rawhide, and I don't have ipv6 blacklisted. But > still: > > [root@adam adamw]# virsh net-start default > error: Failed to start network default > error: cannot create bridge 'virbr0': Package not installed

fedpkg --dist=el5 srpm, mockbuild fails with MD5 sum mismatch

Attempting to build an srpm or do a local mockbuild using fedpkg on an EL6 buildhost fails with EL5 chroot: DEBUG util.py:257: error: unpacking of archive failed on file /builddir/build/SOURCES/0001-10244-Restore-Mongrel-XMLRPC-functionality.patch;4f04a4a9: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch I had to build t

Re: Heads up: ladvd using ifAlias coming to rawhide

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 04:20:16PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > WHAT TO EXPECT: nothing should break because of ifAlias. But if something > goes wrong, let me wrong, I will flip default switch to off in our unit > file. How does this affect lldpad and why do we have both it and ladvd? -- dev

Re: gsmartcontrol, gparted problems with userhelper and X credentials?

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 05:20:50PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 1/3/12 12:22 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > >> You moved between networks, which caused your hostname to change [1]. >> This meant that the xauth cookie for your current session no longer >> matched, because it embeds the hostname, becau

Re: /usrmove?

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:39:47AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:58:32AM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > Yes, FESCo > > * should have recognized early that the scope of the feature was not > > thought through and that more pieces are needed (contrary to claims > > back

Re: DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha

On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 06:48:00PM +0100, Thomas Woerner wrote: > On 03/01/2012 04:52 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: >> On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote: * Jerry James > Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:

Re: DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha

On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:43:50PM -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > There will be a dhcpv6 service entry for firewalld soon and later on > > also for system-config-firewall. > > > > Where how and when it will and could be enabled will be evaluated. > > I'm g

Re: Torvalds:requiring root password for mundane things is moronic

On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:35:11PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > passwd keeps complaining "The password fails the dictionary check - > it is too simplistic" for fake words NOT in the dictionary but > otherwise too simple for passwd's approval system. I think you can just ignore passwd's warning in

when does Fedora 18 Release Naming start?

So according to the Wiki, naming hasn't started yet, but it is also almost over :-) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Name_suggestions_for_Fedora_18 Naming Period: 13 March 13 through 20 March So when does it really start? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorapro

Re: Fedora release model (was Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-17))

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:18:54AM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 11/25/2010 01:13 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > > http://oswatershed.org/ > > Hmm some interesting data there and some looks wrong to me: > > I see openssh at 5.5p1 not 5.0p1. but some like apache ours is lagging > by quite a

Re: SSD support in Anaconda/F14

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 01:06:21AM +, Camilo Mesias wrote: > I'm confused now about what Anaconda has done. I checked with the > commands from this site: > > http://thunk.org/tytso/blog/2009/02/20/aligning-filesystems-to-an-ssds-erase-block-size/ Anaconda (really parted) defaults to sane alig

Re: firewalld - A firewall daemon with D-BUS interface providing a dynamic firewall (test version)

On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 01:29:51PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > -p 0x8035 -j I-vnet0-rarp Who still uses RARP? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Increased Anaconda memory requirements?

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 09:42:40PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 10:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > > > http://anonbadger.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/need-more-memory/ > > > > Why does Anaconda need more memory? Such changes really need to be > > coordinated and d

Re: Increased Anaconda memory requirements?

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 07:50:37AM -0800, John Reiser wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680542 > > Much of this is not a bug, it is intentional. The F14 way of That bug is that the kernel doesn't display a simple "out of memory" error message, instead scrolling a huge trace

Re: Increased Anaconda memory requirements?

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 06:47:55PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 07:50:37AM -0800, John Reiser wrote: > >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680542 > >> > >> Much

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 08:54:23AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Wed, 26 May 2010, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > While you don't edit them *all* the time, it is something that is done > > regularly, and it is something most admins can do with ease. > > Turn them in a C program and you left admins

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 07:27:57PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Jon Masters wrote: > >> Didn't we "decide" that Fedora was intended for more technical users? I > >> don't see many technical users crying out for a hammered shut init > >> system where they feel like they hav

excluding bugzilla email when you are the assignee

Is it reasonable for a package owner to exclude themselves on bugzilla email when they are the assignee of the bug? How would they know when a new bug is reported, or when new comments are added? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf

Re: move libusb from /usr/lib to /lib

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 08:38:27PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > Rob Crittenden wrote: > > Richard Hughes wrote: > >> On 23 June 2010 09:50, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > >>> “/sbin/upsdrvctl is used as the near final step in /etc/init.d/halt to > >>> command > >> That's completely bogus. You really don

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:58:33AM -0400, James Antill wrote: > 1. Leave /etc/inittab functionally as it is in Fed-13, with 3 and 5 > doing the obvious thing and the big comment saying stuff about systemd > instead of upstart. If people want to opt. in to "the new way" they can > just cp /dev/empty

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:49:21AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > The logic behind chkconfig is exposed in many ways in the user > interface, for example in the chkconfig command line, e.g. > commands such as "resetpriorities", and stuff like that. I think having some level of command-line use

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 02:43:45AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 22.07.10 20:40, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote: > systemctl stop postfix.service > systemctl disable postfix.service > systemctl enable foobar.service > systemctl try-restart foobar.servic

Re: Summary of Thursday's call between GNOME and NM devels and Default DNS resolver change owners

Looks great! I've been using this daily on Fedora 21 and I have to say it mostly works well EXCEPT for the captive portal detection stuff which is just horrendously bad, so I'm happy to see a new design that may work a lot better. Will the below be substantially implemented and testable by the Ju

Re: Summary of Thursday's call between GNOME and NM devels and Default DNS resolver change owners

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:18:51PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 13:22 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > Looks great! I've been using this daily on Fedora 21 and I have to > > say it mostly works well EXCEPT for the captive portal detection stuff > >

building an embedded Linux distro into a RPM package

anage the activation and use of self encrypting drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245640 Thanks. Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 18:48:27 -0400 From: Chuck Anderson To: packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: [Fedora-packaging] building an embedded Linux distro into a RPM package Pr

Re: building an embedded Linux distro into a RPM package

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:54:23PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 10:19:26 -0400 > Chuck Anderson wrote: > > ...snip... > > > I would like to submit a new package that provides a Pre-Boot > > Authorization (PBA) image. The PBA is a "bootloade

Re: building an embedded Linux distro into a RPM package

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 08:51:09AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 23:05:07 -0400, > Chuck Anderson wrote: > > > >Is there an existing Fedora "cross" toolchain for targeting a tiny > >i586/i686 Linux userspace with uClibc? Maybe I could

Re: Review swap: parcimonie.sh

I'll take this review in exchange for this one: Review Request: msed - Tools to manage the activation and use of self encrypting drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245640 Thanks, Chuck On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 06:05:59PM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for

Re: building an embedded Linux distro into a RPM package

to be possible. On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:20:04AM -0400, Subhendu Ghosh wrote: > Adding Harald to thread. > > Seems to be nominally related boot path with deo and dm-crypt. > > Adding to Dracut might be preferable to creating a separate PBA > > Subhendu > > On

(co-)maintainer(s) needed for zoneminder

A few months ago zoneminder was orphaned and I took it because I have an instance of it I have to keep running. I got rawhide/F23 to build, but haven't really had the time to test it or do the bigger work necessary to bring it into line with how upstream operates. I also have not updated older br

Re: Do you know how many 64-bit architectures Fedora has?

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 06:02:35PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 24.08.2015 o 16:09, Jonathan Underwood pisze: > >It would be worthwhile adding this to: > > > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks > > Added Is there an analagous macro for "all little endian arches"? This w

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:35:41AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > * All packages not in the critical path whose upstreams have no > mechanism to build against system libraries '''must''' be contacted > publicly about a path to supporting system libraries. If upstream > refuses, this must be reco

Re: The xtrace package needs to be removed from Fedora

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 02:13:43PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > David Howells wrote: > > > > I can see a "fedpkg retire" option for removing it from Rawhide > > > > Which doesn't work, possibly due to a script error: > > > > ERROR:rpkg:Could not retire package: 'Namespace' object has no >

Re: ping6 and other tool6 awkwardness

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 01:10:05PM -0700, J.C. Cleaver wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 1:41 am, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:34:28AM +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > >> On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 09:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> > > While working for an update

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:31:14PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 01.06.2015 um 20:30 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: > >I would think that avoiding a single point of failure (your LAN > >nameserver) would be a *good* thing > > and your holy one and only resolver on localhost is not a single > poi

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants

On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 08:06:26PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Just a PSA: btrfs raid1 does not have a concept of automatic degraded > mount in the face of a device failure. By default systemd will not > even attempt to mount it if devices are missing. And it's not advised > to use 'degraded' moun

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > Le mercredi 01 juillet 2020 à 11:09 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > a écrit : > > > > Actually that part has been answered pretty comprehensively. The > > split between / and /home is hurting users > > Actually thi

Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs

On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 11:19:29AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Mar 3, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > > 2014-02-22 3:08 GMT+01:00 Chris Murphy : > > On Feb 21, 2014, at 2:38 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: > > The necessary context to add here is that both OS X and Windows ha

default local DNS caching name server

Back in 2012 there was a discussion about having Fedora default to using a local DNS caching name server [1]: [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/166018 I think this needs to be revisited. While DNSSEC support has historically been a driving factor for implementing this

Re: default local DNS caching name server

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 02:33:59AM +0800, P J P wrote: >   Hello, > > > On Thursday, 10 April 2014 11:39 PM, P J P wrote: > > I plan to file a feature/change request for this one. I got caught up with > > other > > work this past week so could not do it. Will start with it right away. > >   Pl

Re: default local DNS caching name server

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:44:31PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Simo Sorce wrote: > > >>I hope the NM integration will show up at some point. It's really a > >>pretty nice setup. > > > >I am using it too successfully. Only occasionally unbound seem to get > >confused, not clea

Re: default local DNS caching name server

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 02:09:19PM +0800, P J P wrote: > > On Saturday, 12 April 2014 11:11 AM, William Brown wrote: > > Say I have freshly installed my fedora system at home. I then boot it up > > and start to use it. My laptop is caching DNS results all the while from > > the "unreliable" ISP. >

Re: default local DNS caching name server

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 01:22:32PM +0800, P J P wrote: > > On Saturday, 12 April 2014 7:38 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > Not true, in many networks you want it, for example in corporate > > networks. You really want to be able to resolve the local resources and > > they are only resolvable if you consu

Re: default local DNS caching name server

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:38:41PM +0930, William Brown wrote: > I agree with the goal to add DNSSEC (Despite it's flaws). However, a > caching DNS server can create many headaches without a number of > considerations. > > First, it should be easily possible to clear / invalidate the cache for > a

Re: default local DNS caching name server

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 12.04.2014 15:31, schrieb Chuck Anderson: > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 02:09:19PM +0800, P J P wrote: > >>> On Saturday, 12 April 2014 11:11 AM, William Brown wrote: > >>> Say I have fre

Re: default local DNS caching name server

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:05:21AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Reindl Harald wrote: > > >nonsense - there are so much ISP nameservers broken out there > >responding with wildcards and so on that you can not trust them > >and you will realize that if not before after you start

Re: default local DNS caching name server

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 04:40:50PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:01:20AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > >Maybe we should set the file to be immutable after setting it to 127.0.0.1: > > > >

Re: default local DNS caching name server

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:06:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > >Okay, so here is where you and I differ then. We need a solution to > >run everywhere, on every system, in every use case. > > Sounds like wanting ponies? Obvi

Re: default local DNS caching name server

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:07:07PM +0200, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > One thing I would like to note is that in machines which don't have > a hardware clock, I had problems starting bind and unbound, because > the date was back to 1970 in each boot, so the root dns key was not > yet valid and there

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 07:28:35PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 13:49 -0700, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > > You have connected to an new network. If this is a public network, you > > may want to stop sharing your Music and disable Remote Logins. > > [Turn off sharing] [Continue

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:42:30PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > Hello, > 2014-04-16 14:28 GMT+02:00 Josh Boyer : > > > For a quick summary: > > > > 1) With a firewall enabled, network services don't work without manual > > intervention. > > > > To be perfectly clear, vast majority of network ap

default local DNS failover solution needed, nscd?

at 07:19:17PM +0200, Petr Spacek wrote: > On 25.4.2014 18:19, Simo Sorce wrote: > >On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 09:56 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > >>On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:41:54 -0400 > >>Chuck Anderson wrote: > >> > >>>[...] We need an independent,

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 05:15:57PM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On tis, 2014-04-29 at 14:15 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > = Proposed System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver > > > > Change owner(s): P J P , Pa

Re: default local DNS failover solution needed, nscd?

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 03:58:44PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-12/msg00416.html > > I've never understood why something like nscd is even worth trying to > support. There's a simple, well specified protocol that program can > use to talk to a DNS

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:28:56AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 16:05 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > > > I suspect just dropping the deps would break initial installations, e.g. > > anaconda / livecd-creator. RPM uses the deps to order the transaction so > > that systemd gets i

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:06:51PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 15:36 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > >> On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Simo Sorce wrote: > >> > >> > Why would you care for the domain name as provided by dhcp ?

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 03:55:59PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 16:12 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > If I once connected to an open network called "MyFavoriteCoffeeShop" > > then later on someone creates a network with the same name but with

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Replace Yum With DNF

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 05:21:30PM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: > On 11. 6. 2014 at 08:52:34, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 02:44:10PM +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > > * package 'dnf-yum-compat-command' is installed by default. It > obsoletes > > > Yum and provides its own /usr/

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Replace Yum With DNF

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 02:10:22PM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: > > > We are open to ideas. I think in this situation there is no perfect way > > > how to satisfy everyone. We have thought about this for several months. > > > Renaming dnf back to yum might seem like the best option at first (it was > >

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Replace Yum With DNF

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:01:22AM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: > On 11. 6. 2014 at 14:07:05, DJ Delorie wrote: > > Forcing the users to type a different command name to get exactly the > > same functionality only serves to annoy the user. > > I'm sorry but at this point I feel I gotta ask: have you r

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Replace Yum With DNF

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:38:40AM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: > On 12. 6. 2014 at 10:54:45, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > Nothing will change for you, the yum command will still exist for a > > > few more Fedora releases, > > > > Which only postpones the problem. > > > > > just as the `service` command t

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Replace Yum With DNF

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:31:17AM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: > On 13. 6. 2014 at 10:09:07, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:38:40AM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: > > > On 12. 6. 2014 at 10:54:45, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > > > Nothing will change fo

Re: DNF: why does it refresh metadata all the time

On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 02:39:25PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 20.06.2014 14:11, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > Am 20.06.2014 14:04, schrieb Tim Lauridsen: > >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Dennis Gilmore >> > wrote: > >> > >> In testing dnf on rawhide I

Re: wayland in rawhide

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:59:02AM +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 12/11/15 10:51, Jared K. Smith wrote: > > >On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Tom Hughes >> wrote: > > > >You forgot primary selection/middle click paste, which was what made > >me go back to X when I t

  1   2   >