I've marked your dput review as duplicate as I closed my dput review bug
months ago.
You can package dput-ng. Dput is nearly dead now.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-o
ategy of the
commit to the EOL branches should be enhanced still.
[1]--https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/you-can-pry-it-from-my-cold%2C-undead-hands
--
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
Swap with 1057418.
I won't do anything on Wednesdays, will look into tomorrow.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
2014-2-12 PM6:32于 "Sandro Mani" 写道:
> By the way, concerning OpenCASCADE, this would also open up the
possibility for packaging Code-Aster and Salome for Fedora. I once started
looking at packaging them, but stalled of since it's quite an effort.
Anyone else interested in joining the effort?
Eric
You only have one package?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Thanks for your hard work on these packages in the past.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hi,
I'd like to hack a library from static to shared, does Fedora
recommend this way? I'd like to ship static library still.
Thanks.
--
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
OK.
Thanks.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Let's test this one asap to prevent epoch(if you want):
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcmis-0.4.1-2.fc20,mdds-0.10.2-1.fc20
Last weekend bodhi seemed very slow on processing updates, so I
downloaded and installed from koji by myself.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
On 2/24/14, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Christopher, Harald's going overboard with his emphasis as usual, but he
> is correct that you should take extra care when giving karma if you
> don't get the update from the updates-testing repository. In future,
> please do be careful to check if the updates
Bitbucket has downloads support.
Also you can get the tarball from the tags.
What's the problem?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Feb 26, 2014 7:00 PM, "Tim Lauridsen" wrote:
> The problem with this project is that there is no release tags, so you
cant get a specific version, just download the current master
> this is not very usefull for a fedora package.
You can ask them to tag it from now on. I always do that.
--
dev
Kevin, I think you are talking about releasing models...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Interesting :
fedora-release-notes
***-fonts
Can someone point me how to test them?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
You should ask upstream if this is a mistake or a misleading naming.
Remember try not to use epoch for packages, it's dirty hack.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-con
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe we should add guidelines for bitbucket. That could be very
> similar to github's template:
>
> ===
> %global owner $OWNER
> %global tag $TAG
> %global commit $COMMIT
> %global shortcommit %(c=%{commit}; ech
I've left a negative karma there, they forgot to add the new nss-util
into overrides list.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Mathieu Bridon
wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 16:06 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> I've left a negative karma there, they forgot to add the new nss-util
>> into overrides list.
>
> No, it's been added, but then it was expired:
&g
Welcome.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Is there a policy that for different Fedora.next products, we can
apply different rules?
Or just add comments in the conf?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Yes, I've received many broken reports caused by ImageMagick since
yesterday.
EPEL7 also affected.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
to take it.
Thanks.
[1]--https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827167
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[totpcgi]
totpcgi-selinux-0.5.5-1.fc21.noarch requires
file:///usr/share/doc/selinux-policy/html/index.html
If I understand correctly such packages which need extra selinux policy,
shouldn't they depend on a more vital dep instead of this?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
If Petr has promised to sponsor you then you don't need to be panic anymore
:)
Welcome.
PS. If you have gearman packaged, I'm happy again.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/c
I've contacted the current mono maintainer since last autumn, he had been
"working" on it for a while.
And I think he is an expert on this rather than the current proposer. Plus
it's my first time to see the proposal from an extraneous people outside.
We ought not to bring in extraneous people in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246150
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Adrian Soliard
wrote:
> Right, that's another dynamips. But, what is the other link I share
> before? It's also dynamips.
>
> What that "CANTFIX" means? Can I get the packaging process of
> dynamips? And how do I do it?
That means this package has issues which CANN
There are many broken redirect links, please fix asap.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
You can try asciinema which is already packaged in Fedora:
yum install asciinema
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I am curious about this as well. The URL should be taken from RPM and
> refreshed with every update of the package. The same applies for Summary and
> Description.
Agree, I'm also curious about that.
I can see many old pkgdb summaries contain
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. What I like about TermRecord is that
> it produces a self-contatined html file as output and that it
> doesn't require any external service. From what I understand
> asciinema does require the service and doesn
I will take figtoipe.
Meanwhile I've prepared pdftoipe RPM.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I'd like to leave this position to others... Although these two share the
same upstream at all.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Or simply write down these in Fedora release notes. Gpodder has done this.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hi,
libsodium 0.5.0 will land in rawhide soon.
SONAME change: libsodium.so.4 --> libsodium.so.10
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
Welcome.
Just a note povray is already included by yum install povray.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I'm updating this package, but because of the recent FUDCon I didn't
have time to submit the changes.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
After looking at the link you provided, it's easy to see that we must
have Android SDK packaged which is non-free IMO.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
+1 from me.
Chitlesh is inactive now, we should conside orphan all of his packages.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I'm asking the original owner of redis to see why he chose tcmalloc as
memory allocator, as I couldn't find any strong opinion to introduce
gperf dependency just because of some negligible(not sure, though)
performance improvement. Moreover, jemalloc is the default option for
redis on Linux.
Also
Greeting folks, redis is now *up-to-date* in Fedora repo.
Done:
- Fedora rawhide: 2.8.11
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=538900)
- Fedora 20: 2.6.17
(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/redis-2.6.17-1.fc20)
Incoming:
- Fedora rawhide: 3.0.0 (Private repo)
- EPEL7: 3.
Hi all,
libgit2 soname mechanism has been changed to reflect the ABI breakage,
accordingly the result is:
libgit2.so.0 -> libgit2.so.21
Some packages are affected, that could be solved by rebuilding the package.
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
de
://www.dwarfstd.org/Dwarf4Std.php
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 09:55:05PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> One of my package generates debuginfo by specifying -gdwarf-2 option
>> in CFLAGS. As gcc 4.8 onwards DWARF4 is the default, is it still
>> acceptab
vant color the the proper place, I think it's
order dependant:
"--foreground white"
"--background blue"
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
I'd like to claim the ownership of blktap and alliance.
What should I do next? DIrectly request the ACL via bugzilla?
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduc
My opinion is, you should only comaintain what you want, not take over
other's packages.
If FESCo member could give consent of adding someone as an admin(not
the point of the contact) of a package instead of orphaning lots of
packages, that will be helpful.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@li
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> He is or was a Red Hat employee.
No.
Please use this email address:
vanmeeuwen.kolabsys@com (@ <-> .)
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Juan Orti Alcaine
wrote:
> El Sábado, 28 de junio de 2014 00:31:26 Christopher Meng escribió:
> Thank you.
It's better to nofity him about his archaic email address IMO, as he
uses his working address in the %changelog[1] but not in the whole
system.
I'm also investigating the results, as I also couldn't see what's wrong there.
I fixed this package days ago and it at least could be built(it uses
jam to build which is totally a mess to me).
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
How many patches needed for the latest mule?
Are these[1] merged already?
[1]---http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/mule.git/tree/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-co
cgit/libkolabxml.git/tree/libkolabxml.spec#n305
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hi,
I have a python module for review swap, hope someone can do me a favour,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689
Thanks.
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I've taken it up. Can you please review "vit" in return? It's a really
> quick review too :)
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112072
No problem.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
h
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>
>> >alliance chitlesh, tnorth
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105945
>
> I applied your patch but then noticed that the version is also t
Yes, it's fine.
If you want to avoid such bump you shouldn't use %tag, just fill in
the number. I couldn't see the reason of using this one-off macro.
Release: %{tag}.%{gitdate}git%{?dist}
to
Release: 8.%{gitdate}git%{?dist}
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
/show_bug.cgi?id=1115122
3. vinterm - Vintage-style terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098950
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
kannel failed to BFS because texlive does have a bug (dependency) problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995752
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I'd like to take these 3:
bitbakeixs
guile-lib laxathom
rats smilner, rmonk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraprojec
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 07/02/2014 05:13 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> This is not an official solution, but I am now providing a COPR for
>> Rawhide installs that provides a compatibility library for libgcrypt.
>
> That's awesome, but can we get this in rawhide
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Anyone here interested in maintaining a libgcrypt compat package for F21
> lifetime? I'd be happy to help sort out packaging and get this through
> the review process.
Have you got any response from Google actually?
--
devel mailing list
dev
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> You must be confusing me with someone else. I am not a libgcrypt
> maintainer and haven't talked to Google about this.
No.
It's a burden for downstream to ship such a compat- package for chrome
only, and chrome is not a part of Fedora.
http
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 12:35:26AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
>
>> It's a burden for downstream to ship such a compat- package for chrome
>> only, and chrome is not a part of Fedora.
>
> Maintaining softwar
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Jason Taylor wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> I grabbed the zsh-lovers for a formal review.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:56:48PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> Swap ZODB, sphinx-rtd-theme and BTrees with
>> 1. osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
>
> I&
IMO q(pkgdb: q) lang should be obsoleted by the pure(pkgdb: pure) lang
pointed out by upstream many years ago.
For those compat-gcc* packages, shouldn't they be retired?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Condu
Can someone package statusnotifier into Fedora? I want to test it.
Or Kevin, any plans on the packaging?
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
gt; 301-302:
>>
>> | 301 os.chdir("/")
>> | 302 shutil.rmtree(os.getcwd())
>
> Ouch ... can we ban this guy from Fedora?
Why it's considered as "simple"? I couldn't find it behind.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://ci
Put this in the bookmarks:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 07:55:42PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>
>> netatalk orphan, fkocina
>
> I'd like take this one.
I will approve later when I finish the cleanup(in progress), then you
can do anything you want here.
IMO motif should 'Obsoletes' lesstif in Fedora since motif is free now.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.o
o this or am I missing something here?
You should check your account in FAS to confirm you'd already in
packager group. (I guess so, right?)
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
I couldn't see any words from RPMFusion guys so far about this.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
fferent mirror.
And I believe users list is better for threads like this, no offense.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I'm afraid of some runtime dependencies clash, small amount of
rebuilds to all (r-)deps?
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
ble:
---
ghc-srpm-macros
gnat-srpm-macros
go-srpm-macros
ocaml-srpm-macros
perl-srpm-macros
---
Cheers.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
You have a chance to get your rpmfusion softwares wiped after the sync.
[1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
so depending on devel package is superfluos overshot wasting
> resources.
Yes, and to avoid faddish name like nodejs-packaging. It's better to
create a central repository for macros, and then decide where to put
them.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
deve
ex-xcolor
Hi,
2 years ago I packaged reposurgeon, and wrongly submitted the SCM
request in Bugzilla as name repsurgeon. Jon retired it quickly after I
told him about the mistake.
Thanks.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
A small request:Can you package it into EPEL6?
I found this one only shipped in EPEL5,therefore why not ship it into EPEL6?
--
Best Regards,
Christopher Meng--'Cicku'
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and Contributor of GNU.
Blog:http://cicku.me
Social:http://abou
I suggest yum switchlang
I think someone may install two or more langpacks in parallel.
--
---
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
If doing ports is a hard job,will you continue?
In other words,should we have to push this package into fedora?(if build
successfully?)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
t/projects/sourcesans.adobe/
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
e
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hey all,
I wonder if maintainer of fping is available or not.I took a look at the
spec file and see that since f12 rebuild nobody has updated the package.
But I can't say nobody is its maintainer,so I want to find that guy.
Thanks.
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambas
>
> Ok,I'll try
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
why not update to 3.x?
Do you think major version upgrade is impossible?
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
Sorry I forgot that I mean the 'fping' is the package in EPEL, not Fedora,
sorry!
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
I've filed.
if there aren't any response, I'll try to take the ownership.
:)
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproj
I know,of course.I've been told many times,now I manage to avoid saying
like "why not httpd 2.4?" or "why not collectd5?" or blablabla..
Therefore I think there aren't ant conflicts after upgrade.
Thanks.
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador
I said I'll "try",
Thanks.
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I think you should also consider the gnome version in different version of
Fedora.
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
pe you can feel better now.
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Excuse me
I want to take it...
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Okay...
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ina Unicom and China CERNET,they both have
bad connection to each other.
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
http://mirrors.cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
Sorry,I want to know why should we talk about MySQLMariaDB team has
already posted [1] about MariaDB10.0...They said they don't just want to
become a 'brunch' of MySQL.
[1]--- https://blog.mariadb.org/mariadb-directions/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedora
Is it similar to the minimal install media of some distribution?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
OKAY,it sounds interesting,I'd like to join.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
101 - 200 of 501 matches
Mail list logo