On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> wrote: > However, I have to admit, that having a standard package name for macros > needed for building non-native-extenstion (noarch) binary packages can > be handy. Especially if major of packages do not need header files and > compiler, so depending on devel package is superfluos overshot wasting > resources.
Yes, and to avoid faddish name like nodejs-packaging. It's better to create a central repository for macros, and then decide where to put them. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
