Hey,guys...
Will there have a MATE spin later?
Thanks...
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Got problems with Windows? - ReBoot
Got problems with Linux? - Be Root
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel
Well, maybe the result is nobody will support openbox as default.
Your words make me think why users hate Linux desktops... :)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I've helped ccing infrastructure team.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Funny...I suggest that we can submit a changing desktop feature per release.
Maybe this is the best solution.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
which board?ARM?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
This topic seems becoming useless.
If possible, I think me and other ambassadors will take a survey in China.
;)
Ps. I agreed Matej' b opinion.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I've handed up with this question when I first request for an upgrade of
mediawiki.
I remember someone told me that upgrading may cause errors of custom css or
custom theme,is it true?
在 2013-2-9 AM5:37,"Pete Travis" 写道:
>
> On Feb 8, 2013 12:54 PM, "Stephen John Smoogen" wrote:
> . Two the fix
I've handed up with this question when I first request for an upgrade of
mediawiki.
I remember someone told me that upgrading may cause errors of custom css or
custom theme,is it true?
在 2013-2-9 AM5:37,"Pete Travis" 写道:
On Feb 8, 2013 12:54 PM, "Stephen John Smoogen" wrote:
. Two the fix is to
e keyboard friendly than Gnome 2 was.
Somewhat funny that many users even don't know this tweak tool and ask
everywhere about this..
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Got problems with Windows? - ReBoot
Got problems with Linux? - Be Root
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora P
I remembered his clamav confused a lot of people.
在 2013-2-11 PM2:06,"Kevin Kofler" 写道:
> Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 10 Feb 2013, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> >
> >> I will revert most of your changes. please avoid to apply your personal
> >> style
> >
> > Please remove tor-systemd and other "pe
NEXTRELEASE should be great.
28 days is not enough...Somebody never subscribe devel ,even their email
address is invalid.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I've hit gnomeshell problem for 13 times and rtythmbox for 7 times.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
在 2013-2-22 AM8:22,"Orcan Ogetbil" 写道:
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:36 PM, poma wrote:
> >
> > Shouldn't the default be an '-a'(anonymous) check out via git?
> >
>
> I think it should too. Maybe there are good reasons behind not making so.
> Meanwhile you can do
> $ yumdownloader --source pkgname
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Are you going to let bugzilla maintainers know somehow? I would assume
> that once the crash count surpasses a certain threshold, you could add a
> comment to the bugzilla report:
>
> "This has crashed for 100 users, see [FAF URL] for details.
>From yesterday this still happened.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
在 2013-3-4 AM7:30,"Dan Mashal" 写道:
> I understand but is this happening on 18? I know it's happening on
> rawhide for sure.
Yes.
F17 & F18 & Rawhide.
I'll recheck today later.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Me, too. Thanks.
BTW,uReport still have some problems.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I don't suggest you doing that.
Upgrading to Fedora 19 is not good for end users.
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Got problems with Windows? - ReBoot
Got problems with Linux? - Be Root
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
2013/3/5 Dario
Wrong list, please.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
在 2013-3-6 PM2:40,"Kurt Seifried" 写道:
>
> can I use my existing openid? kurt.seifried.org.
Maybe only yourname.id.fp.o?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
在 2013-3-6 PM3:33,"Pierre-Yves Chibon" 写道:
>
> On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 11:49 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > Wrong list, please.
>
> How so?
>
> Pierre
Weird, I didn't reply to this thread...
Sorry...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
FIxed.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
A lot of wiki page should be updated.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Oh I have to rewrite in Chinese again...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
A suggestion:
Should we let users to specify the grub2 sequence or key pressing after the
installation before reboot?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Users who want to know the changelog mostly will go to homepage or github
like Dan said.
If some one even don't know upstream is what, I think changelog is useless
for him.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
o see lines hidden by clicking arrow down,
abrt itself crashed.
This also happened in gedit. If I want to see more lines outside of current
textspace it will crash.
Please fix.My system is totally updated.
Thanks.
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Got problems with Windows? - ReBoot
Got pro
Things got horrible now.
A few minutes ago, I plug my AC power and my laptop crashed.
Then it cannot startup anymore...
BTRFS is crashed.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
In fact nothing important stored on that partition...
I'll have fun with fixing possibility.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
在 2013-3-12 PM3:03,"Tomasz Torcz" 写道:
> This sounds like updates that SHOULDN'T be pushed. If update has no
> changes worth mentioning, it is trivial - trivial updates should not be
pushed.
If upstream release a minor bug fix version, what should we do?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedora
BZ #920996 and BZ#919267.
GTK related.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I can help as several months ago the budgie music player was packaged by
myself. At that time the desktop was however unstable.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduc
Maybe it's caused by buggy sctiptlets, I met this weeks ago on dbus.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:57:14 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> You will need to convince a sponsor to sponsor you.
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group?rd=Extras/HowToGetSponsored
>>
>> Many sponso
ly install yaws in EPEL7 only with a dated 1.98 version.
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado
wrote:
> was retired because were having multiple failed builds from fedora 15
>
> see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843203
Thank you for the info shared above, I will try building it and then
submit it again.
--
de
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Anshu Prateek wrote:
> hi,
>
> I am working on packaging an upstream (aerospike) which presently puts some
> of its file in /opt/aerospike.
>
> The two main folders in use (by upstream) are
>
> /opt/aerospike/sys/udf/lua - This has the user defined lua functions
>
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-01-03 at 14:58 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to know why yaws was retired as it's a Web server still being
>> used by many people, can someone tell me what happen
Roger, I will fix the issues soon.
cclive may have some include errors while elektra and libflatarray
need to be revised for the RPM %files section.
Thanks.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
I will check your patches and then approve the review.
Sorry for this.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of
/1.0.12_to_1.0.13/abi_compat_report.html
Meanwhile gloox 1.0.12 will be pushed to all branches still as
upstream had disabled SSLv3 to avoid POODLE in that release.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
ys ago when I tried to install/remove 7000+ packages from half-completed
downloading in Neal's way, it didn't work at all.
But without asterisk in the command, things could be harder once there are
numerous RPMs being taken.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
/bin/dnf is a file instead of a symlink as well
since I've created a symlink on my system. (a little bit strange though)
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I don't think libunicode is a good name, actually it's too common and
should be avoided.
You should also ask upstream about the potential file conflicts.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
ly see Gentoo and it's derivatives give users choice to install
different versions they want, but Gentoo has different concept while Fedora
releases precompiled binaries, you can't control this actually.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mail
l.
Some not useful but interesting links:
http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php?topic=19514.0
https://prezi.com/mp6xsbxxskdq/from-delphi-to-lazarus/
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
l
jwm
elektra
dmenu
profile-sync-daemon
python-eyed3
oyranos
Thanks.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
of any anything
> that uses it?
Maybe you don't use rawhide?
gnupg2 uses it for a long time. You can query the dep info on rawhide
machine, 3 packages need it: gnupg2, gnupg2-smime and npth-devel.
I still maintain it, but other maintainers especially of gnupg2 are welcome.
--
Your
I'd like to know the performance loss estimated/examined by FESCO, or
I think it's a bad idea on i686 systems, it's already slow enough.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-
troduced in the new ocaml.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
if he
really wants to control something trivial.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Elasticsearch was never safe:
http://www.elasticsearch.org/community/security/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124252
So it shouldn't go ahead in current status.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ebuilds by spot(Tom), but there are many packages not
rebuilt yet.
[1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1195707
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code o
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203045.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1185565
May help.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
Without consent from FPC such shift would be problematic.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hi list,
Per some old news[1], I believe SHA-1 is not secure anymore. But after
checking fedora-review(1), I still see possibility of using SHA-1.
Is it the time to drop SHA-1?
Thanks.
[1]---http://shattered.io
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
On 3/8/17, Adam Williamson wrote:
> What do you mean by 'using SHA-1' and 'drop SHA-1', exactly? You're not
> giving enough context. Not all uses of hashing algorithms have security
> consequences.
Checksum.
fedora-review -k.
--
Yours sincerel
I hope someone can take mldonkey, as I still remember the days patching it
to pass the compiler.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
is a name change request to change it to
python-pycairo(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731891).
Can anyone offer some help there?
Thanks in advance.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Always playing in Fedora Project
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
Hello, nice to meet you.
Just a note that your name linked with this gmail address is:
""
Hope you've noticed that.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Con
adness(who is of course alive and has
commit acl, too) can update it. But I think my words are tiny.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Fєdоґa ї₴ al$о a кїпd оf нaт lїкє Яёd Haт.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Mathieu Bridon
wrote:
> Note that the package was renamed anyway, without waiting for the rename
> review request to be completed:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pycairo.git/commit/?id=c700bd496bee56d8f0de03ef4d57a34d1a97bcf0
And I would ask why he can do t
On Oct 24, 2013 1:26 AM, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
> Right. So, I would suggest:
>
> Since the rename review is stalled, someone update and submit a new
> rename review (closing the old one as a duplicate) then get it
> reviewed.
>
> The only slight wrinkle in this is the folks who have commit on pycai
Errr...
I just hope if a packager is also its upstream, we can sponsor him
quickly as well. Also applied to "comaintainer as upstream". And if
people coming from some Big Company like Oracle/HP, we can sponsor
them as well as normal guys.
See an example of mindi-busybox, packager from HP still ca
I also have plenty of packages:
Re-review request of mlmmj: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933
herbstluftwm - A manual tiling window manager:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001407
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
It seems that most of members from the new formed groups are working for
Red Hat. Well it's helpful to strengthen our technical base but are there
any plots for other people?
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
Some of them are being developed again on GitHub.
If no one want to take care of them, I can take.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Please check #350 again.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Censorship? I think we have no reason to change the package name
because of some governments‘ being evil.
Have you tried opening a ssh tunnel proxy for firewall breaking?
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Cod
So any new progress here?
I haven't seen any updates still so far.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Maybe a new feature in Bodhi 2.0?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Hmmm... http://stratagus.com/ lists version 2.2.7 from 2012-08-20,
> but Fedora only ships 2.2.4 from 2007-04-08.
Of course it needs an update. Many other packages are in the same situation.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproj
Hi all,
Being as the comaintainer of mldonkey, I'm willing to take it as the
lastest version update is pushed by myself.
However this is an ocaml package and I'm not familiar with ocaml, the
bug 640399 about bundling codes is not easy for me to fix.
If anyone is also interested in this famous so
a month assigned to the
> current maintainer and there's been no response. Is there a policy on
> transferring ownership of an abandoned package?
See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Fєdоґa ї₴ al$
Ticket #350 needs 2 votes on final decision.
Please consider.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 06:39:25AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> Ticket #350 needs 2 votes on final decision.
>>
>> Please consider.
>>
> What would help is if you could add to the ticket what makes this
On Nov 14, 2013 6:21 PM, "Matej Stuchlik" wrote:
> Maybe use only the name of the source file, and add a comment above
> explaining that it comes from that URL?
>
> You can use "checklist-cce-feed?id=295#nameofthesource.tar.bz2", but I'd
say ^ is
> the best idea.
>
> Matt
+1 here although it's j
Maybe an RFE:
pkgdb2 should be able to scratch the %{summary} in RPM specfile as the
short summary of the package automatically, especially when some
packages change their summary in the spec.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
This package is in my plan, I will help do an *informal* review.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
ons
mutter installs desktop file to /usr/share/applications
byobu installs desktop file to /usr/share/applications
So I think that maybe these have been doing wrong for years? Should I
file RFE for these?
Thanks.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Fєdоґa ї₴ al$о a кїпd оf нaт lїкє Яёd Haт.
http:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:26 AM, punto...@libero.it wrote:
> hi
> Hadoop has nothing to do with glew ...
> can you please add the part, of the build.log, where fails to compile?
> regards
> gil
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=479029:
Checking for libhdfs ... no
Checking for
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:00 PM, "Germán A. Racca"
wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> I fail to see what is the wrong location in your opinion. Do you think that
> a window manager should install its desktop file in /usr/share/xsessions or
> in /usr/share/applications?
Hi,
Adding files must be accomplished by git add, or fedpkg won't include it
due to a bug in GitPython.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
, but like I've said before, no guidelines here.
And I asked current mono maintainer to bring mono 4.0 for Fedora
later, do we need some time to revise the current ancient Mono
guideline?
Thanks.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Fєdоґa ї₴ al$о a кїпd оf нaт lїкє Яёd Haт.
http://cic
Isn't it should be implemented implicitly in RPM?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Check this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905396
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I just took "dreampie"
Sounds useful for me.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I still can't see any updates in the guideline, what should we do for
this kind of case? Still allow no ldflag macro inserted?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
he package in Fedora behind the one in RHEL in spite of the
maintainer of these two are the same people?
Thanks.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Fєdоґa ї₴ al$о a кїпd оf нaт lїкє Яёd Haт.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
Can be also extended for Mono snk key file stored in /etc/pki.
We should also let packagers to use the system shipped key file instead of
using the bundled anymore.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: h
You can check epel-devel list, we just discussed something there.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Swap with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033433 if you like.
I need to handle these remaining bugs now.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduc
Deal.
I will review yours later.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I was packaging some Perl modules of rt4 a month ago.
If you want help, I can do it.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Swap with this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Swap with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1047414,
even simpler than yours. ;)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Swap with: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
WIll be "Ready" soon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
IIUC, are you building multiple libs into one big RPM?
> All of the EFL subpackages now ship in a single tarball
I don't think we should follow up. This is not allowed IMO.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of C
Can upstream come up with a better name? ;)
It has a long name and contains a binary with naming collisions.
IMO someone should advise upstream to change name like
"silversearcher" or "tss".
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/deve
Sometimes sponsorship is quite easy, this is unfair to other people around:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048966
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-condu
801 - 900 of 1066 matches
Mail list logo