On Tuesday, February 10, 2015, Radek Holy <rh...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Does "sudo dnf remove kernel*-3.18.3*" work for you? > > From the DNF's persepective ( > http://dnf.readthedocs.org/en/latest/command_ref.html#specifying-packages), > your specification is in the form "name" (because of the missing dash) and > there is no package with a name matching "kernel*3.18.3*". Also in the > second query, it is assumed that the name must match "kernel*3.18.3". > > TBH, I don't know whether we should extend the forms of package > specifications to support your case. The current behaviour seems to be > safer to me. I mean, if we improve it, user wouldn't be able to query just > package names as easily as now. > -- > Radek Holý > Associate Software Engineer > Software Management Team > Red Hat Czech
Days ago when I tried to install/remove 7000+ packages from half-completed downloading in Neal's way, it didn't work at all. But without asterisk in the command, things could be harder once there are numerous RPMs being taken. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
