Re: Fedora 13 continuing the tradition of being an update monster

2010-05-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:27:30 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > I don't think either wesnoth or openarena are on the desktop spin. > > They are probably only on the games spin. So the impact of those, > > really should not be that big. (

Re: One week slip of Fedora 13 release

2010-05-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 21:37:35 -0400, "Paul W. Frields" wrote: > > According to the release criteria[1], the decision was made to slip > the release of Fedora 13 by one week, to Tuesday 2010-05-25. Even though the end result was a slip, I'd still want to thank the people that worked hard ove

Re: Retire glib and gtk+ 1.2 from rawhide?

2010-05-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 08:23:33 +0200, Léon Keijser wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 02:09 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > > Anyway, do we have a Fedora policy to remove software just because > > they are old and unmaintained upstream? If there is a happy userbase > > and a maintainer willing to ta

Re: clutter on F13 - nvidia graphics card

2010-05-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 17:48:42 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Could someone please tell me what the status of support for clutter on > nvidia cards in F13 is? Does nouveau support composting or whatever it > is needed for clutter? If you install mesa-dri-drivers-experimental in F13, Nouveau w

Re: Fedora 13 Release Candidate Phase

2010-05-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 01:25:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > I would like to hear some more thoughts on that. IMO, either the game > update should getting pulled in or people should just accept that the > size of the games are large and updates are going to be big as well and > focus on

Re: Fedora 13 Release Candidate Phase

2010-05-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 02:23:38 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 05/13/2010 02:22 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > I don't see that pulling in the games is a good idea. The release process is > > that only blockers should be pulled in right now, though that is being >

Re: Fedora 13 Release Candidate Phase

2010-05-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 16:22:13 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > My understanding was that we would still open a rel-eng ticket for a > freeze exception. Which I didn't do for Wesnoth. Because the outcry > for it was underwhelming. And likely another rebuild will be needed shortly. I still need

Re: Fedora 13 Release Candidate Phase

2010-05-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 09:06:39 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > I can prep for the test tonight, but it's a pain to do the final test > > remotely. So that will wait until tomorrow. > > > Email me as soon as you want this done, and I'll do it ASAP. Two people have confirmed that a combination

Re: Renaming packages, trimming changelog and re-starting revisions?

2010-05-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > May as well, as long as the Obsoletes/Provides are good. The obsoletes don't appear to be good. I noticed that yesterday and filed a bug this morning. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: Renaming packages, trimming changelog and re-starting revisions?

2010-05-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 18:17:51 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > On 05/13/2010 05:54 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39 -0500, > > Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> May as well, as long as the Obsoletes/Provides are good. > > > > T

Re: Fedora 13 Release Candidate Phase

2010-05-14 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 08:58:04 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 06:52 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > > I'm up for the challenge previously having been told it wasn't > > possible for release criteria and blocker bugs ;-) > > > > > > And we're still making judgment cal

Re: web-m and Fedora 14

2010-05-20 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 18:39:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > So you all already heard the news, Google has released web-m as a > royalty free format under a BSD license style license. They have also > have started using it in YouTube. So if we get things aligned, Fedora > 14 would be ab

Re: libjpeg for F14

2010-05-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 17:55:39 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > hi there, > > Can it be updated to upstream version in rawhide ? Normally you want to file an RFE bug against the package. That way the request doesn't get lost. (It still might not get done right away.) -- devel mailing list

Re: base kernel to build fedora

2010-05-23 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 17:21:36 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 05/23/2010 02:25 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: > > > > > I don't think anyone thinks rebuilding the builders every 6 months (and > > fixing all the bugs that comes with that) is a good use of their time. > > > > -Mike > > But

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-05-26 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 23:39:49 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > It appears this subject has been picked up on lwn - so I'm certain there > > will be a fruitful, productive and constructive discussion there. > > Hahaha! You gotta be kidding! LWN keeps posting flamewars as "ne

Re: Any volunteers on bug 477486 ???

2010-05-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:12:31 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote: > Dne 29.5.2010 09:03, Matěj Cepl napsal(a): > > The eternal glory and basking in the shite of the FLOSS gods' favour > ^ > ehm, that should be "shine" ... I figured it was one of two possible

Re: tor-lsb -- hey, look, package script, don't complain to _me_. I'm just installing you.

2010-05-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 00:39:14 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > So, clearly, there's some disagreement about what's fixed and what's broken. > But printing out a passive-agressive warning to end-users is not the > solution. The error message is confusing and very, very unhelpful. Worse, > it'

Re: tor-lsb -- hey, look, package script, don't complain to _me_. I'm just installing you.

2010-06-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 16:55:26 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > > Fixing init scripts and %post is now left in the state "maintainer is too > busy to fix". In the past I already offered co-maintainership or taking > over the package due to my close relationship with upstream. It's a lame > excuse

Re: tor-lsb -- hey, look, package script, don't complain to _me_. I'm just installing you.

2010-06-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:48:02 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > >>Fixing init scripts and %post is now left in the state "maintainer is too > >>busy to fix". In the past I already offered co-maintainership or tak

Re: Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

2010-06-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 16:43:07 -0400, James Laska wrote: > Greetings package maintainers, > > Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji > packages? This includes results of rpmlint [1], rpmguard [2] and, if > applicable, initscript [3] tests. Good news, you can now op

Re: Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

2010-06-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 18:00:52 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > Can I opt in for all packages I am the owner or all packagers I co-maintain > > with one command? > > one command per pkg, yes. > > autoqa-optin pkgname devel F-14 F-13 F-12 EL-6 EL-5 EL-4 That answers my question. If mail woul

Re: i386-class support changed in F-13?

2010-06-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 22:43:25 +0200, Gland Vador wrote: > On 05.04.2010 14:48, Dan Horák wrote: > > > > I was trying to install i686 variant of F-13 to an Alix board (2D13 with > > Geode LX) and got into troubles. The kernel boots fine, but when it > > should start initramfs the kernel panics

Re: i386-class support changed in F-13?

2010-06-02 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 08:19:24 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > On 06/02/2010 12:09 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> It does work in F-12, the response for the lack of support in F-13 was > >> 'deal with it'. There is suppose to be a patch

Re: Problem with createrepo for modified DVD ISO

2010-06-18 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:15:09 -0400, Digimer wrote: > Hi all, > >I asked this on buildsys, so this is something of a repost. I'm not > sure where to turn at this point, so if this isn't the right list, would > anyone be able to point me in the right direction? Probably the question be

Re: Problem with createrepo for modified DVD ISO

2010-06-20 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 17:07:02 -0400, Digimer wrote: > > Perhaps they are, and I will look into them. However, my curiosity has > been piqued, so I'd still like to know how it's supposed to be done. It > seems to me like it should be a somewhat straight forward task, so I am > curious abou

Re: Fedora, DNSSEC and GOST (ECC like) algorithms with openssl

2010-06-21 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:07:05 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > > Some references showing there should not be any known IPR issues filed > with the IETF that would prevent implementing RFC standards using ECC: DJB has made some public comments on why he doesn't think any patents apply to ECC wor

Early warning of Ogre, MyGUI and CEGUI updates in rawhide

2010-06-27 Thread Bruno Wolff III
I am finally starting work on getting Ogre 1.7 into rawhide. I will also bump the related packages MyGUI and CEGUI to the latest version as well. I'll be working on these locally so as not to make people rebuild dependencies multiple times. Barring unexpected problems I should have this ready befor

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] headsup: ghc-6.12.3

2010-06-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 20:43:26 -0400, Jens Petersen wrote: > Just to update I finished rebuilding all the ghc packages in dist-f14-ghc > over the weekend and they should appear in the next rawhide push. > > Probably kaya and hedgewars should be rebuilt too. I'll bump hedgewars once the updat

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] headsup: ghc-6.12.3

2010-06-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:35:39 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 20:43:26 -0400, > Jens Petersen wrote: > > Just to update I finished rebuilding all the ghc packages in dist-f14-ghc > > over the weekend and they should appear in the

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] headsup: ghc-6.12.3

2010-06-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 20:25:19 -0400, Jens Petersen wrote: > - "Bruno Wolff III" wrote: > > I just suggested the rebuilds as best practice. :) I'll probably be doing one in F14 to get the latest upstream release, once I get a bit of a lull. So there shou

Re: libjpeg-turbo conflicts in rawhide

2010-06-30 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:10:11 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Another wrinkle here is both libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo existing in > rawhide/repo. Shouldn't libjpeg get removed now? Doing so should help > matters too. If someone looks at that, they might also want to look at dropping 'man' w

I claimed qgis

2010-07-03 Thread Bruno Wolff III
I was looking at qgis for doing roleplaying maps (I am not sure if that will work out) and noticed it was way behind upstream and then when filing a bug, noticed that it was orphaned. I am going to try to get it updated to 1.4 and see how things go. If it works out for roleplaying, I'll be a long t

Re: I claimed qgis

2010-07-03 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 01:40:52 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Sorry, but qgis has been orphaned and not updated for more than 3 months, so > it needs a rereview as per: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package_Proce

Re: I claimed qgis

2010-07-03 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 02:21:22 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > The added complication is that the criterion is when the package was last > touched before being orphaned (and some people say it should be when it was > last touched by the maintainer, which is even longer ago in qgis's case),

Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)

2010-07-06 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 01:56:41 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I think this is another problem with pkgdb or Fedora. Why is there a > > maintainer ("owner"?) and co-maintainers, rather than just having all > > co-maintainers be equal? > > Good point. I think, just

Re: New QGIS owner

2010-07-09 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 21:19:05 +0200, Volker Fröhlich wrote: > Dear Fedora members! > > I'm happy to announce myself as the new owner of the QGIS package. Thanks. I wanted to play with that a bit to see if I could use it for RPG maps, but the package does a lot more. -- devel mailing list d

'man' in comps?

2010-07-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
It looks like man is being replaced by man-db in F14 (though the last I checked the package hadn't been dropped yet, just obsoleted). However comps still lists man in the base group. Should this be changed to man-db? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.o

Re: libdvdcss and the DMCA

2010-07-25 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 22:07:03 +0100, Naheem Zaffar wrote: > Probably posting it to the wrong place, but does this court ruling set the > precedent to allowing the libdvdcss library to be part of Fedora? I wouldn't expect so. Distributing circumvention tools is probably still be a problem eve

Re: music list maintainer/owner - how to get changes made

2010-07-27 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 00:27:32 +1000, David Timms wrote: > > I find it really limiting in a forum that is supposed to be enhancing > communication and collaboration to end up with most people replying only > to the original author. I hope it isn't intended. You also suggest people use reply

Re: Firefox 4 for Fedora 14?

2010-07-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 17:00:01 -0500, "Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ)" wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > That is assuming that "the other repo" uses the same name as Fedora's. > Fedora could call it ffmpeg-free, and "the other repo" could call it > ffmpeg-nonfree, and

Re: Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Meeting #3 Friday @ 16:00 UTC

2010-07-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 19:33:46 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > > 615443 :: NEW :: livecd-tools :: David Huff :: booting live images from > nightly fails (can't mount root filesystem) :: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615443 > --This bug was reported on July 16, 2010, coming up

Re: Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Meeting #3 Friday @ 16:00 UTC

2010-07-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 23:08:13 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:33:46 -0700 > John Poelstra wrote: > > > 615443 :: NEW :: livecd-tools :: David Huff :: booting live images > > from nightly fails (can't mount root filesystem) :: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?

Re: Testing Fedora? Please enable SELinux if you can

2010-07-30 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 09:51:05 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > I decided to respond to these emails about Google Applications in a blog > entry The link to Drepper's stuff should be: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/selinux-mem.html Your link has a ~ and a trailing space. -- devel mailing li

Re: State of the Fedora 14 Alpha Blockers + Meeting summary

2010-07-30 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 14:25:46 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > > 617115 :: ON_QA :: livecd-tools :: David Huff :: rawhide live spins > showing black screen instead of syslinux boot menu :: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617115 Just in case David sees this, this should have bee

Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out

2010-07-30 Thread Bruno Wolff III
I was unable to find a fingerprint for pkgs.fedoraproject.org. Since the risk is low, I'll start doing work and check it retroactively. I think there should be some comment in the documentation about what the project expects maintainers to do with regard to using it to avoid man in the middle atta

Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out

2010-07-30 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 21:07:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > I was unable to find a fingerprint for pkgs.fedoraproject.org. Since the > risk is low, I'll start doing work and check it retroactively. > > I think there should be some comment in the documentation about w

Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out

2010-07-30 Thread Bruno Wolff III
I noticed that the f14 repo from the kernel mirror seems to have only things that are tagged dist-f14 and no inherited stuff. (Note that while there is kitutuki-0.9.9c-1.fc13.i686.rpm, it's tagged both dist-f13 and dist-f14.) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedora

Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out

2010-07-30 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 22:24:59 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > I noticed that the f14 repo from the kernel mirror seems to have only > things that are tagged dist-f14 and no inherited stuff. (Note that > while there is kitutuki-0.9.9c-1.fc13.i686.rpm, it's tagged both > dist

Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out

2010-07-30 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 22:39:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > Probably related to this I got some broken package dependency warnings emailed > to me that seem to be for things that weren't rebuilt for F14. Is it safe > to ignore this batch of warnings? I see this got an

Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out

2010-07-31 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:45:13 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > Hi. > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:48:22 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote > > > I got some info from McGrath and added it to the wiki. > > I don't think it's a good idea to save informations that are u

Re: fedoraproject.org certificate has expired

2010-07-31 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:08:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun > already ... > > My web browser is complaining that admin.fedoraproject.org is presenting > an invalid SSL certificate: it expired July 31, 2010 8:17:52 AM ET, > ie ab

lordsawar changing from GPLv2+ and GFDL to GPLv3+ and GFDL

2015-07-04 Thread Bruno Wolff III
While working on the 0.3.0 for lordsofwar update I noticed that it is now GPLv3+ and GFDL instead of GPLv2+ and GFDL. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-11)

2015-07-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:09:05 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: nethack-vulturesbruno 60 weeks ago This one is mainly due to string format warnings, most of which are false positives. I got about half way through in about 4 hours. Most likely I'll

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-11)

2015-07-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:09:05 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: nethack-vulturesbruno 60 weeks ago nethack-vultures is now rebuilt in rawhide, f22 and f21. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li

Re: Sponsor shortage

2015-07-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 12:04:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: Nowadays, I would likely shift the prerequisites to highlight the importance of - the "fedora-review" tool - Mock, as needed by fedora-review and used by koji - koji, the Fedora Build System I started out as a user, and as ti

Re: Improving our processes for new contributors.

2015-07-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 22:38:38 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote: 2) We now have the possibility of obtaining sponsorship through co-maintaining packages, but that's somewhat low profile and less used as a route to sponsorship (just an impression-I have no data on this). I think this is wher

Should generic-release issues block releases?

2015-07-14 Thread Bruno Wolff III
This is being post to remixes, test and devel since people on test and devel may not ordinarily be involved with remixes, but might want to comment. Replies have been pointed back to the remixes list (hopefully won't be munged) and you probably should join remixes temporarily if you want to fol

Re: Orphaning Tremulous

2015-07-20 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:49:13 +0200, Jan Kaluža wrote: I'm orphaning tremulous and tremulous-data packages. The upstream is dead and it fails to compile against new speex in rawhide. I think the package is more or less ready for retirement, but maybe someone else would like to fix the sp

Re: DNF 1.0.2 Released

2015-07-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 04:49:34 -0400, Honza Šilhan wrote: Finally there’s the new release of DNF which fixes the bugs which were highly demanded from Fedora community (former yum users). When a transaction is not successfully finished DNF preserves downloaded packages until the next success

Re: Boost updated to 1.58.0 in rawhide and f23

2015-07-24 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 19:26:09 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: blobby blobby needs this patch to build: http://git.engineering.redhat.com/git/users/jwakely/fedora/blobby/commit/?h=ostream (I've sent the patch to one of the upstream project maintainers). But it still fails anyway with: /

Re: Boost updated to 1.58.0 in rawhide and f23

2015-07-24 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 19:26:09 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: blobby needs this patch to build: http://git.engineering.redhat.com/git/users/jwakely/fedora/blobby/commit/?h=ostream Could you attach a copy of that patch to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239387 (the blobby FTBF

Re: building an embedded Linux distro into a RPM package

2015-07-25 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 23:05:07 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: Is there an existing Fedora "cross" toolchain for targeting a tiny i586/i686 Linux userspace with uClibc? Maybe I could use that to build linuxpba and the PBA image itself. I'd still need a custom kernel, because the standard kern

Re: building an embedded Linux distro into a RPM package

2015-07-25 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:54:41 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 08:51:09AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: openwrt builds on Fedora with very little work. The first part of that is building the cross tool chain it uses to build images. Okay, but is that toolchain in

Re: Updates not getting pushed?

2015-07-26 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 15:49:35 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: I have updates for both F21 and F22 that were requested for testing on the 22nd and still haven't been pushed, but I also can't change them because trying to do so says: "Unable to add or remove builds from an update that is currently

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)

2015-07-27 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:19:06 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: The following packages did not build for two releases and will be retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know Package (co)maintainers Status Change ===

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)

2015-07-27 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:19:06 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: The following packages did not build for two releases and will be retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know Package (co)maintainers Status Change ===

Re: OCaml 4.02.3 is in Rawhide

2015-07-31 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:43:42 +0100, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: I rebuilt all packages, except: - js-of-ocaml - waiting on package review of a new dependency - ocaml-camlimages - FTBFS http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10514721 but may be a result of the re

Re: Validity of i686 as a release blocker

2015-08-06 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:40:28 -0400, "Paul W. Frields" wrote: "Ambivalent" is probably understated here. It's hard to imagine people securing i686 hardware these days to run a Workstation experience, after all. I still use i686 for my primary server, primary desktop and primary laptop.

Re: dnf distro-sync oddities

2015-08-14 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:22:09 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: Correct me, if I am doing s.th. wrong, but # dnf distro-sync --allowerasing This command doesn't remove my kernels that are in enabled repos. Note this is a useful command as "dnf update --best --allowerasing" doesn't do what

Re: Rawhide plans

2015-08-19 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:18:04 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: 2. Upgrading from a stable release is also often hard due to broken deps, resulting in having to remove packages just to get upgraded. dnf works much better than yum for this. You can use distro-sync with the --allowerasing option t

Using a patch with DOS line endings

2015-08-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
I have a patch for a source file that has DOS line endings and %patch strips the \r characters causing the patch to fail while suggesting the use of the --binary option. However the %patch macro will not accept the binary option. Is there an easy way to use a patch with DOS line endings or am

Re: Call for testing: 32-bit AMD CPU owners

2015-09-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:08:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: If anyone reading this has an old 32-bit AMD system - the last range of 32-bit AMD CPUs was the Athlon XPs from early 2003, anything 'Athlon 64' or later is 64-bit - and it's not too much trouble, could you please grab a 23 Beta RC

Re: Call for testing: 32-bit AMD CPU owners

2015-09-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 14:17:13 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: I have a dual MP system as my main desktop at home. I rebooted it a couple of times this week with rawhide nodebug kernels (the base system is rawhide) and haven't had a problem. It won't boot from flash drives

Re: rawhide report: 20140709 changes

2014-07-09 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:01:57 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: FYI, rawhide composed fine, but due to renaming and building a new rawhide composer machine it didn't properly sync the compose to the master mirror. :( I have corrected the issue and am manually syncing it over now. I am seeing the

Re: libuv 0.11.x for rawhide

2014-07-09 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 23:00:12 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Hi, I'm packaging neovim for Fedora and my builds failing[0], because using feature not available in 0.10.x releases. In Fedora libuv seems 0.10.x, so can you update it to 0.11.26 (now)? Have you filed a bug against libuv for this

Re: F-21 Branched report: 20140710 changes

2014-07-10 Thread Bruno Wolff III
Are we going to have empty updates and updates-testing repos for branched this time around? This affects the spin-kickstarts package (and possibly the release packages) as normally we want updates enabled, but if there isn't going to be an updates repo for a while, then we'll need to disable it

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

2014-07-10 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 23:37:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: sudo yum-config-manager --enable fedora and, optionally, enable updates-testing: sudo yum-config-manager --enable updates-testing The updates-testing repo isn't there yet. I am hoping we get empty repos created for both update

Re: F-21 Branched report: 20140710 changes

2014-07-10 Thread Bruno Wolff III
Another thing that seems odd today is that no rpms in this morning's rawhide repo have fc22 in their names. I would have expected this morning's build to have started enough after branching to pick up at least a few fc22 builds. I'll be more worried if this persists in tomorrow's rawhide, but

Re: F-21 Branched report: 20140710 changes

2014-07-10 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:25:48 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: We will get mash fixed today and tomorrow rawhide should return to normal. Thanks for taking care of this and the updates/updates-testing repos. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail

Re: Rawhide users: ceph packaging issues

2014-07-10 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 15:36:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 15:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: so, yeah, bit of a mess. You can probably get onto the 0.81.0-5 packages manually with a bit of judicious --nodeps use or 'yum shell' use, but it'd be best if the packages

Re: rawhide report: 20140721 changes

2014-07-21 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:36:47 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: This is pretty minor, but for some reason the devel list copy of the rawhide report arrives significantly after (over an hour later) the test list copy. This didn't used to happen. The branched reports both arrive around th

Re: rawhide report: 20140721 changes

2014-07-21 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 09:30:07 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:03:00 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:36:47 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: This is pretty minor, but for some reason the devel list copy of the rawhide report arrives

Re: The GNU C Library will be rebased in F21 to match glibc 2.20.

2014-07-31 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 23:05:21 +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: the latest commit. I've been doing regular rebases for a while now (almost a year AFAICT) and IIRC we have had just one serious problem last week where i686 boxes got bricked. In the end it was found to be a gcc bug that misco

Re: Contact info - Jeroen van Meeuwen (kanarip)

2014-08-08 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 14:28:30 -0700, Michael Stahnke wrote: Hey, sorry for not getting some of these updated (you also didn't stay on #fedora-ruby long enough for me to respond). I find that updating many of these breaks API, because ruby library authors are really good at fixing security p

Re: New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd

2014-09-04 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 16:11:37 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, [1] since Fedora have some responsibility, unfortunately I think the group have some valid reasons , systemd should be the replacement of sysvinit , a built in DHCP !? why ? and others integration like crontab should be modular, f

Re: Time to start blogging on all of the new Security features in Fedora 21

2014-09-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:46:49 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: If you have one, please send it to me with some explanation of what it is and why it is important. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/ChangeSet#Format_Security This will make buffer overflow bugs a bit less common. -- deve

Re: Dash as default shell

2014-10-02 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 11:59:54 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote: As I said in the snipped part, anyone able to submit arbitrary input to a shell can already cause it to do arbitrary things. The parser bugs do not give the attacker anything they don’t already have, so they are not security-relev

Re: Dash as default shell

2014-10-02 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 13:05:27 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: For the case of arbitrary variables (like USER_AGENT), the problem is closed, because now only variables prefixed BASH_FUNC_ and with a suffix of () in our current patch or %% upstream are scanned for function definitions. Thanks

Re: Anyone else seen systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64 setting /dev perms to 0600?

2014-10-10 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 15:57:12 +0100, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: Both /dev/fuse and /dev/net/tun were set to 0600 (they both should be 0666) at the exact moment that I updated to systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64 this morning. Possible other files have been affected too, but those were the two th

Re: Engineering Representiatve for the new Fedora Council

2014-10-15 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 16:44:09 +0200, Haïkel wrote: After consulting various people, I nominate Josh Boyer as a candidate. My concern is burning Josh out. He has taken on a lot of responsiblity in Fedora already. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproj

Re: Broken dependencies in F21 (was: Re: F-21 Branched report: 20141015 changes)

2014-10-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 14:40:50 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: Does anyone have ideas how to deal with these packages? I have been meaning to deal with meshmagick. I actually did a small part of the changes locally. The issue is that stricter checking by gcc is resulting in the package not bu

Re: fedora 21 lets me install packages without root

2014-10-20 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 06:21:54 -0700, James Patterson wrote: I'd like consistent behavior please. Typing yum install requires a password, so should be the behaviour for running a command that doesn't exist causing a package to be installed. I believe when this was discussed, the consensus

Re: possibly problem with rawhide (systemd-217?): "Found ordering cycle on basic.target/start"

2014-10-31 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 21:47:36 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: Updated my rawhide system. Now it doesn't boot cleanly. Will try to figure out the details in the morning (long week!), but "Found ordering cycle on basic.target/start" seems to be part of it, and I wanted to see if anyone else is hi

Re: Suggested Freeze Policy change for Fedora 22+

2014-10-31 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:17:39 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: The idea here is to ensure that there is a clear engineering deadline in order to guarantee that the QA team has a reasonable time period in which to perform validation tests. I think this approach is too risky this late in the F

Re: Suggested Freeze Policy change for Fedora 22+

2014-10-31 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 14:44:06 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Well, we learned during those questions that it's a matter of coordination with the mirrors. They expect to have our master trees prepared at certain times or they can't be mirrored out in time for the Tuesday launches. So really

Re: Note on 'systemd-216-9'

2014-11-04 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:30:32 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: systemd-216-8 (and 216-1 through 216-5) and earlier) was more or less identical to upstream systemd-stable 216: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd-stable/log/?h=v216-stable . systemd "216-9" is not built from 216 at all, i

Re: Is systemd within a Docker container still?recommended?

2015-03-03 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 15:02:23 +, Dave Melia wrote: I didn't intend to hijack, I used reply-all to get the email address to save typing it. I was merely being lazy, and forgot to change the subject of the email before clicking send... That's what they were telling you not to do. When

Re: A proposal for Fedora updates

2015-04-06 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 23:28:15 +, Bojan Smojver wrote: Kevin Fenzi scrye.com> writes: Imagine a regular Fedora user - the one that has no idea about koji. This regular user wants to contribute by testing packages as they are built. This At that point I don't think they are a regular u

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

2015-04-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:22:25 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: I had also switched back to yum in rawhide due to --skip-broken, and in a few updates not even needing it (I would first see what is broken, and if not something "vital", use --skip-broken), while dnf would just fa

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

2015-04-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:07:08 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: dnf's default behavior is like yum with --skip-broken already. Not when installing packages. If thats not working and you need to find out more, add '--best' to see things without 'skip-broken'. My understanding is that --best c

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >