Would someone with sufficient powers mind queueing up this update?
Thanks,
--
Bojan___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedorapr
Cool, thanks!
--
Bojan___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: htt
Just tried building a scratch build of xorgxrdp, but this still pulls in the
old Xorg, before RHEL 7.7 version. Could someone please change that, so that
builds pick the latest package up.
All in relation to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738669
id="-x-evo-selection-start-marker
There was a note recently in one the the kernel packages about bodhi being a
tad temperamental recently and not pushing updates out. Anyone knows what's
going on with that? Is the fix on the horizon?
--
Bojan___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedor
OK, thanks for the pointer.
--
Bojan___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List G
This was patched out, because an official feature was never submitted. Now that
RHEL8 is using that combo, maybe it's time to try again? :-)
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@li
Awesome! Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Garver
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Cc: Bojan Smojver
Subject: Re: Firewalld v nftables
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:36:12 -0400
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 07:14:49AM +1000, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote:
> This was patc
Looks like build infrastructure is having trouble building Firefox for these
two at the moment. More info here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189964
It you have any ideas of what could be causing this, please feel free to share.
Thanks,
--
Bojan
__
Thank you for the pointer Kevin! Trying to build with older rust in
corp now:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bojan/FF/build/5862010/
--
Bojan
-Original Message-
From: Bojan Smojver
To: Fedora Development List
Subject: Firefox builds broken on F38/39
Date: 30/04/23 12:05:11
ht
Hi Fabio,
Kevin pointed to llvm/rust bugs in that FF bug already:
- https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61932
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109934
So, yeah - folks are already aware of this.
For Firefox, using older rust for builds worked.
--
Bojan
___
If anyone reading this email has special powers to get some of the week old F38
updates unstuck from pending, please click the magic button. 😁
An example of such an update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ef0e8e36fc
Thanks,
--
Bojan
__
Yeah, a ticket may be a better idea. I am not a maintainer of those packages,
so don't want to overstep.
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11508
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduc
107.0.1 build for
F37/x86_64: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bojan/FF/
If you want/need or are obsessive about version numbers, like yours
truly. ;-)
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
FF 107.0 shipped in all current Fedora releases a while ago. You can
find all that in bodhi. If you mean 107.0.1, that will depend on the FF
maintainers. Maybe they see no reason to respin, because the bugs fixed
in that release are not something that is important in Fedora - not
sure.
--
Bojan
_
Yay! Thank you!
--
Bojan
-Original Message-
From: Mattia Verga
Reply-To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Bodhi 7.0.1 deployed to prod
Date: 17/01/23 16:39:49
- Frozen releases updates will now be forced into testing before being
pushed
Hi folks,
Looks like regular nss maintainer may be away and new Firefox requires a higher
nss version than currently built. There is a pull request lined up, so one just
needs to merge, build and create the update in bodhi.
Anyone with sufficient powers around to do this?
Thanks,
--
Bojan
--
Saw Firefox released and its builds failing in koji, because nss was not up to
date (3.102 or better required). Put 2 and 2 together and got... 5. 😉
--
Bojan
8 Aug 2024 7:31:11 pm Clemens Lang :
Hi Bojan,
> On 7. Aug 2024, at 21:07, Bojan Smojver
Cool, thanks!
8 Aug 2024 8:07:41 pm Frantisek Krenzelok :
Both Bob and I were busy with rhel rebases, and decided to skip the 3.102 in
fedora, I am currently rebasing to a 3.103 version. I should have the build
tomorrow.
--
Bojan
--
__
The former is an update to the latest version of spf-engine, which
rejigs the package, among other thing, so this will require careful
testing.
The latter had async IO pulled out, because Python 3.12 no longer
supports the APIs that were used. Once again, careful testing will be
required.
Thanks,
This may be a trivial question, but my friend Google is not showing me any
obvious answers, so I will ask here at my own peril.
Say one needs to configure and build the same source with two (or more)
different sets of options that generate different binary RPMs, but which have
files in exactly
PS. I am aware of the alternatives approach, but looking to see whether there
is something that rpm specs have natively for this.
--
Bojan
4 Nov 2022 7:31:14 am Bojan Smojver :
This may be a trivial question, but my friend Google is not showing me any
Cool, thank you! I think this is exactly what I was looking for
(unsuccessfully).
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.
Thank you!
--
Bojan
4 Nov 2022 8:48:25 am Florian Weimer :
* Bojan Smojver via devel:
> Sure, it is easy enough to configure/build repeatedly and stash the
> results into non-conflicting paths of buildroot, but how does one then
> packag
It was for packaging xorgxrdp with glamor support. Submitted to bodhi now, so
all good.
--
Bojan
4 Nov 2022 7:38:17 pm Hans de Goede :
Hi,
On 11/3/22 21:31, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote:
> This may be a trivial question, but my friend Google is
Possibly in one of the future versions. I am not even sure at this
point how well (if at all) glamor support works with xorgxrdp.
--
Bojan
-Original Message-
From: Hans de Goede
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Cc: Bojan Smojver
Subject: Re: Building two conflicting binar
Quick question about direct to stable updates in bodhi, such as FF
106.0.4 and kernel 6.0.7 that are lined up for F37 right now. Such
updates often end up being in nowhere land for quite some time, because
they skip testing to go to stable directly, but the push to stable
cannot happen for whatever
Maybe push them to both, if they've never been to testing? In other
words, never skip testing.
Sure, there will be some duplication of packages for a cycle or two,
but eventually, they anything that's already in stable will be kicked
out of testing, right?
--
Bojan
__
Now that nss 3.85 has been built, I thought I'd have a go at building
FF 107.0, given that's been out for a few days and original builds
failed in koji, because nss was too old at the time.
No idea how this is going to end up, but the tasks for F3{8,7,6,5} are
here, if anyone is interested:
https
Everything except F38 completed fine.
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-cond
Of course, relevant build overrides had to be provided, because
required version of nss was not in stable at the time I started these
scratch builds. Thought I'd mention it for completeness.
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
Before I open a bug on this, the latest firefox/nss software that is in F36 -
is it not accepting SSL certificates without matching subjectAlternativeName on
purpose?
I still have to complete more tests, but it seems that if SSL certificate is
issued to CN abc.example.com and if that name is no
Ah, cool. Totally missed that in release notes. 🤦♂️
Thanks,
--
Bojan
6 June 2022 8:13:10 pm Alexander Sosedkin :
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 12:03 PM Bojan Smojver via devel
wrote:
>
> Before I open a bug on this, the latest firefox/nss software t
Example:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=76099482
Built the same thing on F35/34/33 and EPEL8/7 and that worked. Did
something change in Rawhide that I should be aware of or is this just a
temporary thing?
Thanks,
--
Bojan
___
deve
V Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 06:40:48PM +1000, Bojan Smojver via devel napsal(a):
> Example:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=76099482
>
> Built the same thing on F35/34/33 and EPEL8/7 and that worked. Did
> something change in Rawhide that I should be aware of
Could someone with sufficient permissions please get httpd package
unstuck in bodhi?
It's been sitting there for a few days, waiting to get to stable, but
it keeps getting kicked out, because some automated tests did not pass.
The package contains security fixes.
Thanks,
--
Bojan
___
Just wondering whether there is a particular reason 5.10 kernel has not been
submitted for testing in bodhi for F33. Or is it simply an oversight?
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
te: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 23:22:12 +
Before be submitted in bodhi , we can test here:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jforbes/kernel-stabilization
On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 22:40 +, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote:
> Just wondering whether there is a particular reason 5.10 kernel has
&g
Just being devil's advocate for a second here...
Two days to build FF in koji? Has it gotten that big or are the builds that
slow?
:-)
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists
Is it skip_if_unavalable or skip_unavailable?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-con
These two options always confuse me, but it should be the former (the other one
applies to main only), so the option is correct. Ignore me - it probably has
nothing to do with invocation.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
Looks like bodhi upgrade may have caused composes to go haywire today:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/composes/
It could be just a coincidence, of course. Anyhow, just FYI if anyone managing
that is around.
--
Bojan
--
___
devel mailing list -- dev
Hi,
Anyone encounter build problems in Rawhide (F42) related to
redefinition of struct sockaddr_ll and struct packet_mreq between
kernel headers and glibc?
This compiled OK until F42, but is now failing. Not quite sure whether
a fix is needed somewhere for this or whether this particular package
It seems the problem was local to this software.
It detects TX_RING support (which, from comments, is supposed to be
required on older systems) and then it tries to use that. Once I
removed the test for TX_RING from configure.ac and set its support to
no, it builds fine, provided __GLIBC_MINOR__ i
Thanks Dominique. I tried patching that to include a couple of underscores that
are missing, but it didn't fix the problem in my scratch builds.
But, yeah - that bit seems like a definite bug upstream.
--
Bojan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.
Opened https://github.com/appneta/tcpreplay/issues/910 upstream, in
case anyone there knows what's going on here.
--
Bojan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fe
BTW, I will try your suggestions when I get a chance.
Thanks,
--
Bojan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org
Hi provenpackagers,
Does anyone have cycles to roll Fedora builds for this nasty CVE in PostgreSQL?
RHEL got patched, but nothing for Fedora yet...
Thanks,
--
Bojan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an emai
48 matches
Mail list logo
