Hello everyone.
Python2 Biopython is required by 'python-MDAnalysis' on fedora 30+
(other than 'openms', already modified).
Ask to the maintainer of 'python-MDAnalysis' (Dominik Mierzejewski -
rathann) if we are ready for switching to Python3 definitively.
Best r
What's your FAS account?
On 23/08/2018 03:16, Manas Mangaonkar wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Kindly assign it to me.
>
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, 23:32 Antonio Trande, <mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone.
>
> I'm leaving the mainte
situation of these packages in a middle-term scenario in
respect of Python2 removal proposal?
Best regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.as
te to XZ.
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7712
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Hi all.
I'm going to retire the packages 'nini' and 'smuxi' on rawhide within
24h since now. Both upstream project look like over.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key ser
python2-twitter-0:3.3-5.fc29.noarch
python2-vertica-0:0.7.4-1.fc30.noarch
rho-0:0.0.34-2.fc29.noarch
sagemath-0:8.2-4.fc29.src
sagemath-0:8.2-4.fc29.x86_64
tracer-0:0.7.0-3.fc29.src
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568
Hi all.
I'm orphaning 'mozilla-requestpolicy' package.
Feel free to adopt it.
Best regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Des
Hello everyone.
In reference to the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639646, is anyone else ran
into this problem with OpenMPI recently?
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key ser
"IBM to acquire Red Hat in deal valued at $34 billion"
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/28/ibm-is-reportedly-nearing-deal-to-acquire-red-hat.html
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
G
Hi all.
I'm going to update HDF to the release 4.2.14 on f29+.
If your need to test it before, this is the scratch build just done on
fc30: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30641568
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot or
Hello!
Please, take a look to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630466
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libtimidity/pull-requests
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key ser
Regarding https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libtimidity/pull-requests,
please i need permissions to build libtimidity on epel7 branch.
On 15/11/18 13:22, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Please, take a look to
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
Thank you Hans.
On 20/11/18 09:58, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 17-11-18 12:18, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Regarding https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libtimidity/pull-requests,
>> please i need permissions to build libtimidity on epel7 branch.
>>
>> On 15/
Hi everyone,
I'm the maintainer of the FreeRADIUS package in Fedora and RHEL. This
package contains multiple subpackages that are shipped in Fedora while
In RHEL9 we removed some of these. There are some users requesting
these subpackages to be available in RHEL9, so I would like to add
them to EP
Hi folks, in rpm-ostree based systems like fedora iot I would love to handle
the migration process similar to what happens today in silverblue et all wrt
sysroot.readonly
https://pagure.io/workstation-ostree-config/blob/main/f/postprocess.sh -
unfortunately that systemd service and script aren'
> Hi
>
> Some time ago I've started working on updating to scotch-7.x, with some
> initial test builds here [1]. To finalize the update, I'd like to gather
> some opinions (potentially affected maintainers in CC):
Hi all.
Hi Sandro.
PETSc is ready/tested for Scotch-7* with the release 3.18.1
T
r disapproval before to make these changes effective on
Fedora and epel7?
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
On 26/12/2017 19:23, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi, Antonio.
Hi Dominik.
>
> On Tuesday, 26 December 2017 at 13:23, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> It seems that we need separated Python2 and Python3 SCons scripts,
>> that
On 26/12/2017 19:23, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi, Antonio.
> ...
>> For that reason, i have rebuilt Scons in two different packages with
>> Python2 and Python3 in Fedora; with Python2 only on Epel7.
>> http://copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/copr
an2:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531955
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
> Is the output from sepdebugcrcfix indicating a failure? If so, how do you fix
> this? If its not this, its really weird because there is plenty of disk space
> and no other indication that something is wrong.
>
> Thanks,
> -Steve
>
Full build log, please.
--
---
Ant
Hi all.
I'm still receiving this warning even if broken dependency should be
corrected with the packaging release number 6:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1017574
Do you know why?
Forwarded Message
Subject: Broken dependencies: python-biopython
Date: Sun,
On 05/02/2018 17:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 02/05/2018 03:53 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I'm still receiving this warning even if broken dependency should be
>> corrected with the packaging release number 6:
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/k
raproject.org/rpms/mc/pull-request/1>
>
>
> One more time I'm asking for contact cmalke and mc maintainers.
>
> kloczek
> --
> Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: *http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH*
>
>
I'm the co-maintainer of 'cmake'. Let me check as as soon as Pagu
On 08/02/2018 13:14, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On 08/02/2018 13:06, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>> On 30 January 2018 at 21:32, Tomasz Kłoczko > <mailto:kloczko.tom...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsiv
tengine libavc1394
> libdv libmodplug libnuml libsbml libsbw libsedml lightning metis mld2p4
> molequeue mp psblas3 qrmumps qwtplot3d qwtplot3d-qt5 spglib wildmagic5
> ...
Fixed.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG k
pport from upstream, so its rpms will not longer
maintained.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenP
Hi all.
'xboxdrv' is now an "orphaned" package.
Feel free to adopt it if needed.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Descript
Hi all.
This mail is part of the "orphaning" procedure for 'rubygem-review'
package [1].
Feel free to adopt it if interested.
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-review
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
G
an you confirm that SSE2 support is not on those architectures?
If it's so, i will obliged to exclude new release of Openclonk on
PPC/s390/ARM.
Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.f
On 17/03/2018 17:41, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Antonio Trande
> wrote:
>> 'blake2' code inside 'Openclonk-8.1' source code requires SSE2 support
>> that seems unavailable on PPC/s390/ARM architectures [1]:
>
> Adding to t
le shell tool ( epel7 el6 )
> rpms/skanlite -- Lightweight scanning program ( epel7 )
> rpms/source-highlight -- Produces a document with syntax highlighting ( el6 )
> rpms/suitesparse -- A collection of sparse matrix libraries ( el6 )
> rpms/svgalib -- Low-level fullscreen SVGA
test -V -E Python -E Star' <--- does not work
Regards.
--
--
Antonio Trande
sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org
See my vCard.
<>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fed
On 07/24/2017 10:28 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> Am 24.07.2017 um 09:55 schrieb Antonio Trande:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> How i can skip multiple tests with CTest?
>>
>> For example, i can skip tests matching regular expression with '-E'
lib
+
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/MUMPS_5.1.1/MUMPS-5.1.1-openmpi/examples:../lib:/usr/lib64/openmpi/lib
+ ./dsimpletest
./dsimpletest: error while loading shared libraries:
../lib/libmumps_common-5.1.1.so: expected localentry:0 `pthread_cond_init'
--
--
Antonio Trande
sag
':
> /lib64/librt.so.1: expected localentry:0 `pthread_attr_setdetachstate'
> stack traceback:
> [C]: in ?
> [C]: in function 'require'
> /usr/share/lua/5.3/posix/init.lua:29: in main chunk
> [C]: in function 'require'
> /usr/share/lmod
On 07/30/2017 03:19 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 07/27/2017 11:15 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>> Same problem with MPI libraries of MUMPS just on PPC64le:
>>
>> + export
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/MUMPS_5.1.1/MUMPS-5.1.1-openmpi/examples
Hi all.
I'm going to abandon 'libpwiz' package on f27.
Feel free to claim ownership if you need it.
Regards.
--
--
Antonio Trande
sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org
See my vCard.
<>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
has atlas
> installed but there is no .so* file that I can find which defines
> these symbols. I also couldn't work out where in the atlas code
> (which is a bit strange) these references are used.
>
> Hence the question: Is this breakage in atlas? binutils?
>
> Rich.
On 07/21/2017 04:51 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> rpms/suitesparse -- A collection of sparse matrix libraries ( el6 )
Let me update suitesparse on el6 too, please.
--
--
Antonio Trande
sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org
See my vCard.
<>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
;
> Thank you Zbyszek for taking care of mlt.
> Richard the mlt fix is here [1].
> [1]
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mlt/c/7ec11616fd9f88c0e1d6f44ec88a4c
> 435e36044f?branch=master
>
Will 'xlocale.h' be provided newly in 'glibc'?
To fix this p
On 08/14/2017 05:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 08/12/2017 06:08 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> On 07/21/2017 04:51 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> rpms/suitesparse -- A collection of sparse matrix libraries ( el6 )
>>
>> Let me update suitesparse on el6 too, pleas
On 08/14/2017 06:47 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 08/14/2017 10:39 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> On 08/14/2017 05:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> On 08/12/2017 06:08 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>>> On 07/21/2017 04:51 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>>&g
un-0:6.0.0-4.fc26.x86_64
udav-0:2.3.5-3.fc26.1.x86_64
vigra-0:1.11.0-5.fc26.x86_64
vigra-python-0:1.11.0-5.fc26.x86_64
vips-0:8.5.6-1.fc26.x86_64
vips-0:8.5.7-1.fc26.x86_64
vips-tools-0:8.5.6-1.fc26.x86_64
vips-tools-0:8.5.7-1.fc26.x86_64
vtk-0:7.1.1-3.fc26.x86_64
vtk-testing-0:7.1.1-3.fc26.x86_64
dplug
> - pyflakes
> - python-libdiscid
> - reptyr
> - rpmdevtools
> - zopfli
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
I can take libmodplug and rpmdevtools.
--
ich-0:3.7.7-5.fc26.x86_64
petsc-mpich-0:3.8.0-1.fc26.x86_64
--
--
Antonio Trande
sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org
See my vCard.
<>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
Hi all.
I have two packages ready for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506949
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506986
I can review other packages in return.
--
--
Antonio Trande
sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org
See my vCard.
<>
signature.asc
Descr
known DWARF DW_OP_253
dwz: ./usr/lib64/libpsb_util.so.3.5.0.debug: Unknown DWARF DW_OP_253
dwz: Too few files for multifile optimization
What does mean? And must i do something about?
bz#1506949/comment#3: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506949#c3
--
--
Antonio Trande
sagitt
On 10/30/2017 09:27 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> On Fri, 2017-10-27 at 21:03 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> [...]
>> dwz: ./usr/lib64/libpsb_base.so.3.5.0.debug: Unknown DWARF DW_OP_253
>> dwz: ./usr/lib64/libpsb_util.so.3.5.0.debug: Unknown DWARF DW_O
on koji, not with 'rpmbuild' and 'mock'.
Can anyone get 'config.log' from build
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22829601 ?
--
Antonio Trande
sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org
See my vCard.
<>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital s
;name=root.log
--
--
Antonio Trande
sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org
See my vCard.
<>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi all.
I have created a fork on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ but i don't know
how to manage it.
Can i use 'fedpkg'?
Documentation?
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https
On 29/11/2017 13:03, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have created a fork on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ but i don't know
> how to manage it.
> Can i use 'fedpkg'?
> Documentation?
>
>
Maybe, i was unclear with my question.
If i create a fork
/copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/
Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
-dchest-safefile - Implements safe "atomic"
> saving of files
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573982
>
> Guake dependency:
>
> - Review Request: keybinder-3.0 - A library for registering global keyboard
> shortcuts
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
On 10/05/2018 14:42, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On jeudi 10 mai 2018 14:35:30 CEST Antonio Trande wrote:
>> On 10/05/2018 14:28, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>>>
>>> Python-twisted dependencies:
>>> - Review Request: python-graphviz - Simple Python inter
Hi all.
I'm confused...
Why recent python-biopython rebuild is still using Python 3.6.5 on rawhide?
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Descr
list:
> Maintainers by package:
>
> sagitter antimony
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Thank you Jerry!
'antimony' is built now.
On 28/06/2018 22:51, Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:06 PM Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Does anyone know how to fix 'antimony'?
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594496
>
> The code
Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DQIJEBYRFKBGSENXO5B67AX5PCMGLXT6/
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https:
27; looks that it's affected by this presumed bug:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2327/28332327/build.log
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
s
guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QJEF3RFJDTQHL4C5EE55VFBFZRRXY5X4/
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GP
>
> I have now orphaned this package (and also removed admin rights from
> cicku/Christopher Meng who stopped contributing to the project a long
> time ago).
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35
Hello everyone,
I am Antonio and I work in the Cyber Security field. I would like to start to
package tools related to the InfoSec in Fedora Official repositories and I am
searching for a sponsor. I am very new on Fedora, after spending a lot of years
in Arch. I already started to package tools
As target for packages, I took as reference the Kali Linux repository where I
created this README
https://gitlab.com/athena-rpm/packages/gitlab-profile/-/blob/main/README.md
with packages to create and packages that are already in Fedora repositories or
RPM Fusion.
Creating that amount of pack
Here I submitted a new package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2365521 since pycryptodome seems to
be already present in the repo source, despite orphan. Can you review it please?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
Hello Fabio, JT, thank you for your messages.
Currently I have a pentesting OS project that is based on Arch Linux and NixOS
called Athena OS (https://athenaos.org) that aims to be more focused on Cyber
Security learning part. I am trying to migrate it from Arch Linux to Fedora
because more sec
I can't; Bodhi says i have not commit access to your packages.
On 28/05/20 19:44, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>
> On 5/26/20 1:49 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
>> Mukundan, your package misses.
>> Please, rebuild `gtkhash` against `libb2-0.98.1` or let me commit
>> c
Hi all.
Please, can anyone else confirm this bug on IceCat?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842171
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Hi all.
Are these `undefined-non-weak-symbol` expected in python-reportlab?
https://pastebin.com/dRZUbpJx
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Thank you Jerry.
On 30/06/20 22:22, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:45 AM Antonio T. sagitter
> wrote:
>> Are these `undefined-non-weak-symbol` expected in python-reportlab?
>>
>> https://pastebin.com/dRZUbpJx
>
> Yes, see this thread:
>
.fc32.src
powdertoy-0:95.0-2.fc33.src
sunpinyin-0:3.0.0-0.2.20190805git.fc32.src
tolua++-0:1.0.93-29.fc33.src
vdrift-0:20141020-21.fc33.src
wesnoth-0:1.15.3-4.fc33.src
[1]
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/1518967/
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit
Hi all.
We are ready to upgrade multiple libraries:
Scotch-7.0.3
PETSc-3.18.5
Sundials-6.5.1
Bout++-5.0.0
In one week at least, these libraries + related dependencies + a new
Python package (python-zoidberg, needed by bout++) will be built in a
f39 side-tag
Best Regards
--
---
Antonio
Hi all.
Reportlab-4.0.4 is coming in Rawhide branch in some days.
Release notes: https://docs.reportlab.com/releases/notes/whats-new-40/
It looks like this new release is installed in python-sitelib paths
instead of older python-sitearch paths.
Best regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora
Hi all.
qwtplot3d-qt6 is a new package and needs a review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156091
I will glad to review another package in return of your courteousness.
Best regards
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key
ill needs qwtplot3d (Qt4) 0.2.7
Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD
GPG keys server:https://keyserver.dcc.sib.swiss/
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel maili
ight choice.
On 07/07/24 22:22, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 07. 07. 24 22:05, Sandro wrote:
On 07-07-2024 19:57, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
How i can pass configuration options to %pyproject_wheel?
For example, i wish to change this line
%py3_build -- --enable-qcas --executable="%{__python3} -s&quo
Hi all.
SuperLU-7.0.0 (https://github.com/xiaoyeli/superlu/releases/tag/v7.0.0)
will be built in Rawhide soon.
Related dependent packages rebuilds are:
$ fedrq whatrequires SuperLU -F source
SuperLU
armadillo
freefem++
hypre
octave-iso2mesh
opentoonz
petsc
Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
c38.x86_64
freefem++-0:4.12-2.fc38.x86_64
freefem++-0:4.13-2.fc38.x86_64
hypre-0:2.24.0-3.fc37.x86_64
octave-iso2mesh-0:1.9.6-8.fc37.x86_64
opentoonz-0:1.6.0-11.fc38.x86_64
petsc-0:3.17.4-15.fc38.x86_64
Best Regards
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
mai
Hi all.
In some days (7 days al least), i will upgrade PETSc libraries to the
release 3.19.4 in Rawhide (waiting for PETSc-3.20).
All related dependencies will be rebuilt in a f39-side-tag build tree.
Best regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD
GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing
Hi all.
I will update superlu_dist to the release 8.2.0 soon; all related
dependencies will be rebuilt.
$ fedrq wrsrc superlu_dist
amg4psblas-1.1.0-7.fc39.src
freefem++-4.13-7.fc40.src
hypre-2.24.0-8.fc40.src
petsc-3.20.1-2.fc40.src
Regards
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
https
Hi all.
SCons-4.6.0 will be built in Rawhide.
Here there are testing builds if you need to try your packages with it:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/6771118/
Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
mailto
dwnld
Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD
GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sign
://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wise2
sundials2 (oldest version of current sundials-6*, no longer needed in
Fedora), https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sundials2
Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD
Hi all.
Next release of Sundials is coming in Rawhide in some days.
Related dependent packages are:
cantera
octave
bout++
Probably, the following one will be a major release (the 7.0)
Best regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
mailto: sagit
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261310
Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD
GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
used, not with MPICH.
At this time, these tests in Rawhide (and ELN) cannot be executed.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD
GPG keys server:https://keyserver.dcc.sib.swiss/
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenP
Great!
Thank you all.
On 11/11/22 16:13, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 11/11/22 07:52, Christoph Junghans wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 10:27 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 11/6/22 07:31, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Saturday, 05 November 2022 at 21:27, Antonio T. sagi
will can push them in Rawhide.
On 12/11/22 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 12.11.22 12:19, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hi
Some time ago I've started working on updating to scotch-7.x, with some
initial test builds here [1]. To finalize the update, I'd like to gather
some opinions (poten
ttps://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_i
Hi all.
Can this update be re-activated or i have to rebuild everything?
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-c154b725ab
Regards
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD
rTesting/builds/
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD
GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
unar
Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD
GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi all.
How i can pass configuration options to %pyproject_wheel?
For example, i wish to change this line
%py3_build -- --enable-qcas --executable="%{__python3} -s"
with
%pyproject_wheel ...
but i don't know how to include "--enable-qcas"
--
---
Antonio Tr
...
(https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1685/87811685/build.log)
If it was an archive issue, it should happen in all architectures.
Anyone know why this occurs?
Best,
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE
GPG key server: https
o not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE
GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/
OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc
Description: OpenPGP publi
Hi Mamoru.
Could be useful changing timestamp of that file when i create the IceCat
source archive to resolve this problem?
On 6/2/22 16:50, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Antonio T. sagitter wrote on 2022/06/02 23:33:
Hi all.
rpmuncompress is failing in Rawhide i686 architecture only with:
/usr
Hi all.
I need to downgrade python-reportlab in Fedora 35 for a missing runtime
dependency. What's the most accurate way?
Bug ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097817
Update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-23aefe21ad
Regards.
--
---
Antonio T
Hi all.
Next release of superlu_dist will be in Rawhide not before next seven
days. All dependent packages will be rebuilt.
Changelog: https://github.com/xiaoyeli/superlu_dist/releases/tag/v8.0.0
Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key
301 - 400 of 504 matches
Mail list logo