> Hi > > Some time ago I've started working on updating to scotch-7.x, with some > initial test builds here [1]. To finalize the update, I'd like to gather > some opinions (potentially affected maintainers in CC):
Hi all. Hi Sandro. PETSc is ready/tested for Scotch-7* with the release 3.18.1 They could be compiled in Rawhide now. Do you agree to syncronize the upgrades of these libraries and related dependencies? > > - Should metis get retired? Scotch has a scotchmetis compatibility > library which is advertised as a faster drop-in replacement for metis, > and indeed ships a metis.h which would conflict with the one from the > original metis package. > - Should I be adding 64-bit index builds for i686? There is a metis64 > package, but since i686 is expected to go away soonish, is it worth the > effort? This is of interest to petsc which currently BRs metis64-devel. > > Side note: I don't really recall how I ended up maintaining scotch, but > if someone who is actively using the package is willing to step up and > (co-)maintain it, please let me know! > > Thanks > Sandro > > [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smani/scotch-7.0.0 Metis is not a "dead project", its maintainers have a GitHub project https://github.com/KarypisLab/METIS but an absent support. I would avoid to activate the Metis code in Scotch. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
