And I got this today:
Error: Transaction check error:
file /usr/share/doc/polkit/NEWS from install of
polkit-0.113-2.fc22.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
polkit-0.112-7.fc21.1.i686
file /usr/share/doc/polkit/README from install of
polkit-0.113-2.fc22.x86_64 conflicts with file from pac
I can't tell you anything about your first problem, but the second one
sounds similar to this one (last paragraph):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225629#c0
Have you tried switching VTs to the one hosting the previous session?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
OK, first things first. This is a quick but relatively comprehensive
overview of ttys, vts etc.:
https://mostlylinux.wordpress.com/troubleshooting/ttysessions/
In my rhbz post, I wrote that when your system is set to boot into
graphical mode, when you kill the wayland server (or gdm I suppose),
gd
Has the issue been resolved? I have pushed three new packages to f22
and f21 updates-testing, but they have yet to appear in my usual local
mirrors.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproje
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> No. We continue to work on it.
Thanks for the information, I thought I had done something wrong in
the submission process.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> First, it would be good to isolate it to the first kernel that doesn't
> work. That narrows down the range of commits to look at for the bug.
So we are looking for boot problems somewhere between 4.1 and 4.2? Can
this be tested on f22 machines
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> So the issues I pointed out in my previous mail (conerning
> MPI_PYTHON_SITEARCH and MPI_FORTRAN_MOD_DIR) above have been resolved. A
> batch of F24 rebuilts has been done by Zbyszek, hitting some build failures
> along the way. Most of these a
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> - Install Firefox 40 on Fedora 22,23,Rawhide (you'd need Gtk3 build)
> - go to about:config, click to any key and add a new one, boolean type. The
> new key name is "layers.use-image-offscreen-surfaces" and set it to true.
> - enable "laye
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> I see the same flickering on NVIDIA hardware. Intel seems to be fine.
Which model? Is it using one of the older driver series?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedo
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> It's GeForce GTX 750 with nvidia binary drivers.
So you are not on the legacy drivers. Could the problem be
hardware-dependent? The graphics adapter of the laptop I tested is one
generation ahead of yours and there is no flickering.
--
de
There is also an issue with elements that are loaded asynchronously -
they take longer to appear or it might take a bit of scrolling up and
down until they are rendered (with the older nVidia card).
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
Their FAQ is constantly updated:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Addons/Extension_Signing#FAQ
I'm not sure if there is a valid practical reason to refuse submitting the
addons that we ship to their signing service or if it is against our
policies; at least mozilla-https-everywhere has been signed.
Mozi
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> We have no real practical way to do this other than package up the addon and
> build it as a -unsigned package, then making a separate package that has the
> precompiled binary and signed by mozilla and put into the add on package.
Aren't t
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Can we ship addons which are already signed by Mozilla? Or does Fedora
> packager modify them somehow?
It seems that even when the source is an xpi file, rpm treats it like
any other source package and its contents can be patched. I don't
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Thanks for the info. Actually is there any reason why Fedora packager would
> need to modify the original extension?
That depends on the extension and its particulars. For example,
adblock plus has an extortion-like scheme in place and i
Does this mean that we need to modify spec files for font packages?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
OK, thanks, I hadn't realized it was all done through the %_font_pkg macro.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I tested
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_Alpha_RC2/Server/i386/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-i386-23_Alpha.iso
on a dual Athlon MP system and it boots fine to anaconda.
A little bit later I discovered
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_Beta_RC1/Server/i386/iso/Fedora-Server-ne
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Luigi Votta wrote:
> Output of dnf search jpilot:
>
> jpilot.i686 : pilot desktop software
> Repo : @System
>
> jpilot.src : pilot desktop software
> Repo : fedora-source
>
> jpilot-backup.i686 : Enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot
> Repo : f
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Les Howell wrote:
> Could a group be formed to somehow create some kind of server node, say
> with Raspberry PI or similar hardware to support a dual network,
> internal and external users and local control as a third branch that
> might address these issues? If i
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Pete V wrote:
> Hi all my name is Pete V.
> As a long time Linux user, I feel the time has come to step up and
> contribute big time.
Welcome aboard!
> were do I assign these to myself, in BZ?
There's some light reading ahead, start with these:
http
Hello,
For the last couple of days I have been submitting updates (with fedpkg)
for some of my packages in all the branches. Currently they all appear as
pending in bodhi and I have not received any messages about them, even for
the ones that got positive karma. The wiki reads for the pending stat
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Almost all notifications from bodhi (with the exception currently of
> adding comments on updates) is sent via FMN (the Fedora notification
> service): https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/
>
> It sounds like you have your notifications
I've reset email settings to the defaults (two rules, "A particular
user's packages (any acl)" and "A particular user "), made sure that
my email address is still there and I've got a "This message delivery
mechanism is currently active" message.
Meanwhile my packages have gone from pending to test
Hello everyone,
I've decided to join the package maintainers and I would like to introduce
myself.
I have been a linux user since 2001 and a Red Hat/Fedora user since 2003.
My main systems run on Fedora (of course) and Gentoo. I have a background
in chemistry, particularly molecular modeling and
So am I allowed to submit it to bodhi, or does it still need to be approved
beforehand? I'm sorry for the mix-up, but it wasn't clear in the wiki.
2014-10-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski :
> On 10/31/2014 11:28 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
So, should we contact upstream about the appdata file requirement and if
that doesn't work out make our own and send it to the package maintainer?
Where should the screenshots go?
I also agree with the proposal (even though this is the first time I read
about a software center), but your list cont
2014-11-06 12:03 GMT+02:00 Richard Hughes :
> I've attached a list of all the applications that would be affected by
> this change. It's a long list, but a *lot* of the applications are
> kinda dubious (lshw-gui anyone?).
>
I read your blog posts on AppStream/AppData and I found some
Workstation/
You can scratch nut-monitor off, it already has appdata:
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/master/scripts/python/app/nut-monitor.appdata.xml
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedorapr
2014-11-07 17:28 GMT+02:00 Richard Hughes :
> Is it in a tarball that's been built for F22?
>
Version 2.7.2 was released in April and it doesn't have it, it's in their
development tree.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fed
I will take care of the MATE packages and coordinate with upstream. I will
also deal with the following:
easystroke
qbittorrent
x11vnc
krename
avogadro
bkchem
chemtool
gausssum
IQmol
openbabel-gui
pybliographer
If someone has already contacted upstream or if you have created appdata
files about
Do we need to tell upstream about these patches?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hello,
A few days ago I was fooling around with Unicode stuff and I noticed
that the Symbola font had been updated upstream, but not in Fedora, so
I decided to have a go at repackaging it and submitting the spec file
to the maintainer. Turns out it was more "fun" than I thought it would
be.
1. Th
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Are those hinting instructions manually tuned or autogenerated with
> ttfautohint?
I haven't the faintest idea. Should I contact upstream, or is there a
way to extract that information from the font tables? The creator
specifically mentions wi
I've contacted upstream about the hinting, I'll report when I hear back.
In the mean time, can anyone offer any advice on the other points
besides hinting?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fed
He wrote back, here's what I've learned:
1. He uses a program called Fontographer by Fontlab [1] which
apparently includes a couple of algorithms for autohinting. He said
that it would be a huge task to do the hinting manually for such a
large number of glyphs, so it's all done by the software.
2.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I think we are much better off shipping the unhinted version then, letting the
> Freetype autohinter do its job.
Agreed. So that takes care of the question of including the HTML file
with the comparison of the two.
As far as the doc package i
Hello,
Does anyone have any other means of contacting Robin Sonefors besides
ozam...@flukkost.nu and irc?
There are several open bugs (e.g.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197402) that require his
attention, but I can not contact him.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
During the last hour, I got three pop-ups on my workstation (which is
connected over Ethernet) with blank windows and a title that read "Captive
portal". Two of them turned to the gnome.org home page, while the other one
just disappeared.
In my journal I have this sort of errors:
Mar 26 03:39:36
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Lots of people have been seeing it, it may be related to some issues
> with the Fedora infrastructure this afternoon (the check works by
> trying to contact a Fedora server).
>
That much I gathered, but when I first read about the captive
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
>
> No, it still makes sense for wired networks. Have you ever used an
> ethernet wall-jack at a hotel? It generally goes through a captive portal,
> just like wireless.
>
Yes, I realized that later on and I discovered the messages pertain
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> You can edit /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/20-connectivity-fedora.conf to
> disable it.
>
Is there a *proper* way to do that so that there aren't any conflicts with
future updates, e.g. commenting the lines out, removing/renaming the file,
se
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> As Adam implied, you can add your own, higher-numbered file with the
> same options and NM will use those in preference to the Fedora-installed
> one. See 'man NetworkManager.conf' for specifics.
Thanks, I found your blog post "NetworkMan
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> There are still quite a few unknowns.
> To summarise, does this locally disable?
>
> crudini --set /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/21-connectivity-local.conf
> connectivity interval 0
> systemctl reload NetworkManager
Take a look at
https://
Hello everyone,
While writing metainfo files for a few fonts, I noticed that their
creator states on his website:
"Fonts and documents in this site are not pieces of property or
merchandise items; they carry no trademark, copyright, license or
other market tags; they are free for any use."
As fa
Since the metadata_license tag covers the metadata files themselves
and not the fonts and documentation, I would feel bad to choose
something more restrictive than what the original creator has chosen.
If CC0-1.0 is (at least almost) equivalent, I am perfectly fine with
that, no need to specify a n
OK, thanks for clearing that up!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hello,
I have been working on a driver package from a hardware vendor and
besides some patches in the code, I am trying to bring the supplied
(messy) spec file close to our guidelines. (While most of the stuff in
the package relies on open source libraries and projects, there are
some files covere
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> It depends on the meaning of the upstream's `-1'. Basically, I would
> interpret it as yet another version level, i.e. as `3.80.1'. If the upstream
> tends to release `3.80.1-1', I'd interpret `3.80-1' as `3.80.0.1'.
So, what would the rpm be n
So basically, one could end up using foo-3.80-1.1.20150506.rpm,
foo-3.80-1_1.20150506.rpm or just foo-3.80-1_1.rpm, or did I
missunderstand something about the use of underscores?
Should this case be added to the wiki page?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> The upstream obviously doesn not differentiate between `upstream
> release' and `Debian package'.
Unfortunately, no.
> Does the upstream bundle `debian'
> directory with patches in the tar archive? Are these patches applied
> automatically by
We don't need to complicate things, whenever such critical updates come
along, the maintainers can post a message here and in the users ml or even
in the forum (somewhere it will be immediately visible). A template for a
message detailing the bodhi-karma process, with links to the relevant page
for
I sent this to the font mailing list a couple of nights ago, but
perhaps I should have CCd devel as well:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alexander Ploumistos
Date: Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:24 AM
Subject: Issues with repo-font-audit
To: fo...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello everyone
Hi,
I'm messing with an old gtk+ program, that I think it's dead upstream
and I'm trying to see if I can resurrect it. Among other issues, it
should add some entries to nautilus' context menus (which it does) but
I can't get their icons to show. Then I noticed that I'm missing all
of my context men
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Haïkel wrote:
> Another possibility is that people didn't find any candidate to their
> taste.
> I suggest adding a None option too.
> Though it won't change results, it will give us metrics to measure that.
>
I'd say that a vote of "0" next to each name, pretty
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 11:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 03:53:26PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Detailed Description ==
> > By default php-fpm is used for a few versions. mod_php is not
> > supported for threaded modules. mod_php usage also increases secu
See this thread from @legal:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JA4FEGORE53RXKOPRADODTBUCQN3XVJE/
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:53 PM Code Zombie wrote:
>
> Hi
> I recently realized that Windows WSL works by actually installing a Linux
> distribution. H
So in a nutshell:
1. You've approached several FLOSS communities, even though you
clearly disagree with their core values.
2. You've complained/filed bugs for things you consider to be
problematic, stemming from the basic principles of said communities.
3. Members of these communities have explaine
Hello Greg,
I'll take it.
Could you please review this in return?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844643
I'll start working on it in a few hours.
Best regards
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an e
Hello,
A few hours ago I submitted a couple of updates[0,1] that I had built
in side-tags. When I saw that after 7 hours they were still "pending"
I got in touch with infra on irc and Mohan gave them a push. I've just
received a notification that one of them was ejected from the push
because "None
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:43 AM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> The other update doesn't seem to be moving, but at least
> it hasn't been ejected (yet).
And the second one was just cast out as well.
___
devel ma
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:24 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 03:23:30AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:43 AM Alexander Ploumistos
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The other update doesn't seem to be moving, but a
I remember that some time ago we were told not to use the
@fedoraproject.org in bugzilla, can't recall why exactly. Has this
changed?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.o
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:08 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 07:52:16PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > I remember that some time ago we were told not to use the
> > @fedoraproject.org in bugzilla, can't recall why exactly. Has this
> > cha
These updates, along with a couple of others I submitted 12h ago, just
appeared in my local mirror. Bodhi still shows everything as
transitioning from pending to testing and I never got a notification
about them having moved to testing. Side effect from the data center
move?
___
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:00 AM Clement Verna wrote:
>
> I have deployed bodhi 5.4.0 (https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases)
> in production today. That should fix the issue with sidetags for normal
> releases :-)
Thank you!
I don't think I'll need to use sidetags until after the data
Congratulations to all of you, this is very useful and beautifully
made. I almost got a panic attack when I saw all the bugs, but I
quickly realized that most of them were for packages from groups I am
a member of. Everything is pretty self explanatory and in the long run
it is going to save us a l
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:04 PM Przemek Klosowski via devel
wrote:
>
> so the repo it's coming from is @commandline, but I am not doing
> it---somehow akmods pulls it in? my repolist is:
You probably have akmod-wireguard from rpmfusion-free.
___
devel
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 7:20 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Let's make Fedora more approachable, by having a default editor that
> doesn't require specialist knowledge to use.
One could argue that this adds to the experience!
> (These arguments would apply
> just as well if git picked Vim. vi is like
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 1:40 AM Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> disclaimer: I'm using zsh, not bash but it has the same issue. But IMO you
> can't really blame it - how is the completion to know that you want to
> install an RPM in the current directory? The correct way would be
> dnf install ./
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:09 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> I fix this on my
> own systems with "dnf remove dmraid"
This tends to take with it many things that it shouldn't, like gdb,
dbus-x11, python3-pwquality, tigervnc-server-minimal and tmux - among
others.
_
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:35 AM José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> On Monday, 29 June 2020 22.23.00 WEST Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > This tends to take with it many things that it shouldn't, like gdb,
> > dbus-x11, python3-pwquality, tigervnc-server-minimal and tmux -
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:30 AM José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> IIRC this is probably related with the dependencies of anaconda:
Is there an easy suggestion we can make to our users other than play
with "rpm -e" or nuking dnf's database? There's a bunch of threads
over at askfedora where people are
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:54 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Thursday, July 2, 2020 8:24:49 AM MST Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 7/2/20 3:16 AM, nick...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > Note that, even though Microsoft is pushing for UEFI on new systems in
> > > the OEM version of Windows, they still
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:22 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> That's a link to the release announcement. If you follow the thread, you'll
> find that I was provided a link to two bugzilla links are to meta links to
> blockers, where the items that are blocking are not issues preventing x86
> system
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:49 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Thursday, July 2, 2020 3:47:00 PM MST Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:22 AM John M. Harris Jr
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > That's a link to the release an
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 6:30 PM Josef Bacik wrote:
>
> On 6/26/20 11:15 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:13:39AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> >> Not Fedora land, but Facebook installs it on all of our root
> >> devices, so millions of machines. We've done this for 5 years.
Hello Dominik and everyone else,
The next release of Molsketch is going to build against Open Babel
3.x, so I started working on updating the openbabel package around the
time version 3.1.1 came out, which supposedly fixed some issues
related to packaging on linux. Based on your spec file, I was t
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> You may want to read the last messages from me in this short thread:
>
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-August/thread.html#213311
I had already starred your messages in that thread :)
Figuring out the descriptio
Is RHBZ linked to FMN? I've been trying to set up a filter for all the
bugs that concern me, but I can't get any example messages, even when
I just select the "All RHBZ activity" rule.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
Hello,
Please forgive my ignorance, but how is this supposed to be used? I
guess it's handy to keep track of all the current keys, but unlike,
say rpmfusion-free-release, the keys are not placed or linked in
/etc/pki/, nor are they imported in a gpg keyring. What am I missing?
Also, shouldn't the
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Right now at least two projects (mock and fedora-upgrade) contains and use
> those keys.
> So once this get into Fedora (and Epel) I can remove those keys from
> fedora-upgrade and mock and use this common package.
>
> Mock need CentOS an
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Albino B Neto wrote:
> ^CTerminated.
>
This looks like you pressed Ctrl+C and forced the termination yourself.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Albino B Neto wrote:
> Yes. He were loading for more time.
>
>
Well, having a slow connection to your nearest mirror is not really a bug
in dnf. Try again later or specify a different mirror.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedor
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> about money: with the energy costs i saved going away from P4 computers many
> years ago my current one is already paied
Nobody is saying that a newer computer won't save you money on the
power bill. What they have repeatedly stated and for
How come datagrepper lists FAF reports for the package from 2015-07-20,
when it hadn't been included yet?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:10:07AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>> How come datagrepper lists FAF reports for the package from 2015-07-20,
>> when it hadn't been included yet?
>
> Who said it was not included? It
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Apparently, ABRT reports crashes for packages not part of Fedora.
Thanks, I'd guessed that much, but I wanted some confirmation.
> A possible fix would be to look at the signing key in the RPM database
> and report only packages which are
It was orphaned in late February.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jwm/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I'm guessing you are subscribed to this mailing list. Every now and
then you get messages with subject lines like "Orphaned packages in
rawhide". You could have seen it quite some time ago.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/219062
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
Is there any point in updating fonts in rawhide to their Unicode 9.0
versions, before the change is implemented?
Besides the font checking tools that do not know of Unicode 9.0 (or 8, I
think), will anything important break after such an update?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Kopeček wrote:
>
> For that I need some samples of the USB descriptor data. I can generate some
> samples but it's always a good idea to have real world samples.
>
Do you need any "exotic" devices plugged into the system and should we
try to have as many de
That's a bit unfortunate, as scidavis, which uses qwtplot3d, is almost
ready to be reintroduced to Fedora [1],[2]. I don't suppose there is
another library that could be used as a drop-in replacement, is there?
[1] https://sourceforge.net/p/scidavis/scidavis-bugs/285/
[2] https://build.opensuse.or
It's already been dealt with, see RHBZ #1368745.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> So even after 'dnf clean all' the -13 version that should fix this
> problem is not listed as an update in either updates or
> updates-testing. Is that expected?
It hasn't been that long since the update left the pending state, so
I'm guess
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Mary Clarke wrote:
>
> The Modularity working group is looking to standardize terminology that users
> use to interact with functionality around modules.
Perhaps it would be better if someone provided some examples for the
functions described here - at least for
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Sylvia wrote:
> This is maybe a silly question but... if you're architecture is, let's say
> x86_64, why would anything install an i686 version of the same package?
If you install a 32-bit program, it may pull in other i686
dependencies. See what happens if you t
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> 1) Are there still cases where an admin would want to use optical media
> on a machine that *could* boot via USB, for legitimate reasons? (I
> genuinely don't know the answer to this).
So far I've had to deal with three small factor PCs wi
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Am I the only one who can't see the email body below?
No you are not.
After, squeezing it through base64, it reads:
I had this issue of 1 in / in F24 I had upgraded from 22.
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
Unless there is a bug in anaconda, that smells a lot like UEFI.
Did you boot in BIOS/Legacy mode or UEFI when windows 8 were installed?
What were your BIOS settings with regard to that and SecureBoot?
There are some issues with recent Lenovo laptops, UEFI and linux.
2014-11-30 19:09 GMT+02:00 Ch
1 - 100 of 484 matches
Mail list logo
