Can I be added to the list of maintainers that need help very badly from the
beginning?
I maintain a number of packages that are very low in the Java stack and would
force the whole Java stack to be removed if they are removed but noone wants to
maintain them.
That's how I gained them! If such a
Comments inline.
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 1:36:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...
>
> On 11/22/2011 08:51 AM, Aleksand
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 1:57:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...
>
> On 11/22/2011 09:40 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 11/22/2011 04:51 AM, "Jó
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 2:42:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...
>
> On 11/22/2011 12:37 PM, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
> > You don't improve distri
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 3:34:50 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...
>
> On 11/22/2011 12:49 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 3:57:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...
>
> On 11/22/2011 01:48 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov w
As much as we have disagreed on the previous topic we might have similar
thoughts here :).
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 7:51:31 PM
> Subject: Dropping the ownership model
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Giovanni Campagna"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2011 1:03:27 AM
> Subject: A software center for Fedora
>
> As promised in my previous mail, here is what I find that's lacking
> in
> Fedora, compared to the direct compe
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Kofler"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 10:12:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for F-17
>
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Are you trying to say the Fedora Project has made it much too easy
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Reindl Harald"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 7:15:51 AM
> Subject: Re: UsrMove feature breaking "yum upgrade" upgrades from older
> releases to F17?
>
>
>
> Am 26.01.2012 05:02, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> > O
- Original Message -
> From: "Brendan Jones"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 2:44:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Rolling release Fedora - fantastic idea
>
> On 01/30/2012 12:59 AM, Henrique Junior wrote:
> > I've started talking to Greg KH, the guy who impleme
Isn't it time for v4 ?
Alex
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Schwendt"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:38:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-17
>
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:33:39 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote:
>
> > On
- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 7:05:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Does the X server in Rawhide eat Control-Space?
>
>
> Le Mer 8 février 2012 12:17, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> >
> > Aft
- Original Message -
> From: "Peter Hutterer"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 2:50:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Does the X server in Rawhide eat Control-Space?
>
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 12
Johann,
Aren't you provenpackager? If not this looks like the best thing to do so you
push these changes yourself and considering that systemd is the initd system
noone should complain as this was already approved. I bet not every packager
that hasn't responded is unresponsive and have done oth
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 12:20:10 PM
> Subject: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
>
> I am a feature owner for a feature that involves components in the
> hundred
- Original Message -
> From: "Marcela Mašláňová"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 1:57:11 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
>
> On 03/02/2012 12:52 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthias Runge"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:00:32 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
>
> On 02/03/12 12:52, Aleksandar Kurtako
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthias Runge"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:05:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
>
> On 02/03/12 12:53, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> > I'm afraid we end up with more b
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthias Runge"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:15:51 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
>
> On 02/03/12 13:10, Aleksandar Kurtakov
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:16:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
>
> On 03/02/2012 11:52 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:27:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
>
>
>
> - Original
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthias Runge"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:34:11 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
>
> On 02/03/12 13:24, Aleksandar Kurtako
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:34:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
>
> On 03/02/2012 12:27 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> &
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:37:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
>
> Dne 2.3.2012 13:19, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
> >
> >
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:54:52 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
>
> Dne 2.3.2012 13:47, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
> >
> >
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 3:08:26 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
>
>
>
> - Original Messa
, schrieb Matthias Runge:
> > On 02/03/12 12:52, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >>
> >> If a maintainer doesn't respond to a bug repord with the status
> >> new in a week - give commit rights to the reporter in pkgdb
> >> so he/she can fix it himself.
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Reindl Harald"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 5:56:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
>
>
> Am 02.03.2012 16:47, schrieb Karel Zak:
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 10:20:10AM
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 6:45:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
>
> On 03/02/2012 04:42 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> > Yes the automation would just automat
- Original Message -
> From: "Reindl Harald"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 6:45:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
&g
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 6:56:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
>
> On 03/02/2012 04:49 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > What access do you need? If you need som
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Haley"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 1:38:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Roadmap for Java things in Fedora
>
> On 03/07/2012 04:34 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Any plans for sunsetting GCJ?
>
> That's an interesting que
- Original Message -
> From: "Stanislav Ochotnicky"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, March 9, 2012 11:58:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [fedora-java] Roadmap for Java things in Fedora
>
> Quoting Garrett Holmstrom (2012-03-08 23:11:26)
> >On Mar 7, 2012 7:54 A
According to repoquery nothing depends on this package anymore so I orphaned it
in rawhide.
If noone takes it I'll deprecate and remove it in beginnning of April.
Alex
- Original Message -
> From: "Tom Callaway"
> To: json-ow...@fedoraproject.org, scm-comm...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Orion Poplawski"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, 21 August, 2015 1:58:35 AM
> Subject: Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets
>
> On 08/20/2015 02:50 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > I was just wat
IIRC, sqljet needs netbeans-platform (swing-smth to be precious from netbeans)
for its db browser UI which is a subpackage so disabling this part to build
(and killing the browser subpackage) should remove the need for netbeans
platform
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Me
- Original Message -
> From: "Kalev Lember"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Saturday, 26 September, 2015 1:08:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree
>
> On 09/24/2015 07:2
- Original Message -
> From: "Jiri Vanek"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:54:04 PM
> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
> platform in Fedora
&
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:58:05 PM
> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
> platform
ubject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
> platform in Fedora
>
> On 02/27/2015 12:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > On 02/27/2015 10:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >
> >> If we want to be sure that this legacy jdk will not inter
Hi everyone,
I will push Lucene 5.1.0 to rawhide next week. Followed immediately by Eclipse
rebuild to make it work with it.
This is early enough in the F23 cycle to give time for people to port to 5.x.
If someone is not able to migrate to Lucene 5 - he/she would have to submit a
Lucene 4.x comp
Hey Jiri,
Please guide me how to find the actual build failure log. I tried finding
the ant one but didn't succeed yet
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java11/package/ant/
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
>
> Please see
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/J
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> Current stats from my testing samples:
> 408 failing
> 263 passing
>
>
Are these numbers reversed ^^^ ? Looking at
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/java-maint-sig/java-11-default/monitor/
I see a bit more than 200 ftbfs.
> That is hug
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> Current stats from my testing samples:
> 408 failing
> 263 passing
>
> That is huge improvement. Thank you all.
> I'm now running last rebuild n copr, and in week or two an mass rebuild
> will be taken in koji.
>
> There was an discussion what t
Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the
Change to Java 11 as a default?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:02 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 9:52 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >
> > On 6/29/20 1:59 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > >
; > Subject: Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the
> javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with
> > java-11-openjdk as system JDK")
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov
> > wrote:
> > >
> > &
- Original Message -
> From: "Brendan Conoboy"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 9:14:11 PM
> Subject: Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements
>
> On 03/20/2012 12:05 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > So if you're willing to live like that, I mu
- Original Message -
> From: "nomnex"
> To: "List Fedora-dev"
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 2:39:48 AM
> Subject: End user needs info: Freeplane on Fedora 17
>
> http://freeplane.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
>
> Will there be a Freeplane package available on the F17 rep
- Original Message -
> From: "Frank Murphy"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:55:23 AM
> Subject: Re: End user needs info: Freeplane on Fedora 17
>
> On 12/04/12 08:54, Caterpillar wrote:
> > Which problems do you have with freemind? Maybe I can che
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Schwendt"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:01:51 PM
> Subject: Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging
>
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:03:25 -0500, JLTI (Jason) wrote:
>
> > For a while n
- Original Message -
> From: "Nelson Marques"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 2:18:50 PM
> Subject: Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging
>
> No dia 26 de Abril de 2012 01:08, Stephen Gallagher
> escre
- Original Message -
> From: "Alec Leamas"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 7:13:52 PM
> Subject: Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging
>
> On 04/26/2012 05:49 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Thu, 26
I have seen way too many problems caused by people installing such
*nonmaintained* packages to even think this will cause more troubles than it
will solve.
Alex
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 3:32:33 PM
> Su
- Original Message -
> From: "Roman Kennke"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 3:15:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Important kernel update should not break stuff
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 13.06.2012, 13:05 +0100 schrieb Johannes Lips:
> >
> >
> > O
- Original Message -
> From: "Ian Malone"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 7:27:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Important kernel update should not break stuff
>
> On 13 June 2012 13:31, Aleksandar
- Original Message -
> From: "Alexander Todorov"
> To: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora"
> ,
> "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> Cc: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 4:51:52 PM
> Subjec
- Original Message -
> From: "Josh Boyer"
> To: "Daniel P. Berrange" , "Development discussions
> related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 4:53:03 PM
> Subject: Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrang
Hi Jerry,
Closing as notabug is perfectly valid solution in your case. I also have a
bunch of such packages myself. The thing is that there is no way for this to
have been known by the automated tool thus we end up with such false positives.
I have to also add that the percentage of false posit
I'm all with you Ville.
But this requires someone jumping in to do work and there is noone. We have to
live in reality - noone is showing any interest into working on this :(.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Ville Skyttä"
> To: "Development discuss
Please keep java 1.7.0 around for some time. It would make moving easier if we
have to jump back for a build or two.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Omair Majid"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9
time-frame of the F21. This is one the reasons why we would
> like to be able to switch over to OpenJDK8 asap for F21.
>
> 1: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html
>
> Deepak
>
> > --
> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
&
usable for pretty much anything in Fedora repository. This might sound like a
simple task to do but if you multiply it by few hundred packages have to be
audited and all the complications coming from the variety of build systems it
becomes a huge investment of time to have Java 8 as def
Even smaller than one would think.
/me joins the party :)
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Oden Eriksson"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, April 7, 2014 9:49:22 AM
> Subject: Re: Self Introduction: Oden Eriksson
>
team
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Deepak Bhole" , "Development discussions related to
> Fedora"
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:41:30 PM
> Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8
>
> I'm not proposing h
for rhel-6 and
> rhel-7?
As you probably have guessed I can not answer such questions. You can either
speak to your TAM or wait for public announcements.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
>
> On 05/06/2014 09:50 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > One of the biggest offender
- Original Message -
> From: "Florian Weimer"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Fedora Java Development List"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 3:00:54 PM
> Subject: [fedora-java] Mass-bug filing for removed OpenJDK 9 internal APIs
>
> I plan to file bugs against packa
I don't have the time nor to will to deal with it anymore.
Master is orphan now, feel free to pick it up. If noone does it in a week I'll
deprecate the package.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Rati"
> To: "Fedora Big Data SIG" , "Development
> discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Fedora Java Development List"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 7:03:42 PM
> Subject: Hadoop + log4j2 = fullstop
>
> I'
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Rati"
> To: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" , "Development discussions
> related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Fedora Big Data SIG" , "Fedora Java
> Development List"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 2
Deprecated now.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 6:32:49 PM
> Subject: Orphaning eclipse-birt
>
>
I don't have the time and energy to maintain piccolo2d and it's no longer
needed by my packages - thus orphaned now. Feel free to pick it up if you want
to keep it in.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Jackson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:02:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
>
> On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We merged in the side tags on May 27, and
- Original Message -
> From: "Richard Hughes"
> To: "Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop"
>
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 6:28:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Slipping F21 (was: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting
- Original Message -
> From: "Reindl Harald"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 6:44:09 PM
> Subject: Re: Slipping F21
>
>
> Am 11.06.2014 17:41, schrieb Jiri Eischmann:
> > +1, we've already skipped one release and we just can't delay
> > significantly
In the commit I see java-1.5.0-gcj, you might want to drop it now that gcc-java
is no longer built.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Omair Majid"
> To: "fedora-devel"
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 8:58:46 PM
> Subject: Comps change for OpenJDK 8
>
Hi everyone,
Fedorapackager eclipse plugin has been neglected for quite some time and
updates are broken after the Bodhi2 update.
So are there any users left? Is anyone interested in maintaining it? Enhancing
it?
Any feedback is more than welcome as it might be time to let it rest in peace
if
- Original Message -
> From: "Danishka Navin"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:45:25 AM
> Subject: Netbeans IDE package for Fedora
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a specific reason that Netbeans IDE is not available in
> Fedora repository?
A really simp
Ask in pkgdb to become and comaintainer and fix it ?
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Reindl Harald"
> To: "Mailing-List fedora-devel"
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 12:41:39 PM
> Subject: careless introduced dependencies
>
> what needs to be done
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 7:57:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
>
> On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
> > "Jó
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 9:20:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
>
> On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >
Hmm, actually I have new proposal.
Policy about active/inactive maintainers should be decided only by actual
maintainers. In the true meritocracy way - if you don't maintain anything you
don't have a say.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Reindl Hara
ld be removed.
P.S. My words would have been a lot more harsh if sending from personal email!!
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Sunday,
orphaned without
> finding it out the hard way in the running release cycle
>
> and if you need to find out things automatically you need
> any flag to measure - this would be FAS login
>
> Am 04.11.2012 08:37, schrieb Aleksandar Kurtakov:
> > How does it sound? Really like th
;Michael Scherer"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2012 9:43:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how
> to install into a LVM partitions (or
> RAID))
>
> Le dimanche 04 novembre 2012 à 13:19 -0
- Original Message -
> From: "drago01"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 9:39:54 AM
> Subject: Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how
> to install into a LVM partitions (or
> RAID))
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012
Where is the community spirit? What went wrong with fedora community? Why on
earth do you people insist on tracking people activity and not try detecting
unmaintained packages?
Detecting unmaintained packages is even easier and has clearer metrics.
Really, why noone wants people that are ready
ady to do
> one
> thing in a year".
>
> Vit
>
>
>
> Dne 6.11.2012 09:52, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
> > Where is the community spirit? What went wrong with fedora
> > community? Why on earth do you people insist on tracking people
> > activity and n
gt; Dne 6.11.2012 12:58, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
> > I agree. I'd rather give people permission to co-maintain package,
> > then push them out of community. I'm afraid we can only loose
> > maintainers by measurements of activity.
> >
> > Marcela
> >
One have to say the hard truth - only the latest fedora release is supported by
many maintainers because that's what they/we use.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthieu Gautier"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Miller"
> To: "Fedora Development List"
> Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2012 6:17:56 PM
> Subject: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?
>
> There is a perpetual problem facing all Linux distributions around
> how fast
> to m
- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 4:30:32 PM
> Subject: Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?
>
> IMHO use of software collections is a symptom of a badly ru
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 5:06:04 PM
> Subject: Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?
>
> On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 15:30 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Mark Bidewell"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 5:50:03 PM
> Subject: Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Adam Williamson <
> awill
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 11:54:46 AM
> Subject: Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?
>
> Dne 6.12.2012 17:31, Seth Vidal napsal(a):
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Jan
- Original Message -
> From: "Dennis Gilmore"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 9:02:48 AM
> Subject: Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:23:50 -0700
> Brend
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Rati"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 7:01:33 PM
> Subject: Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock
> talk)
>
> I think there is another data point to include in the discussion. As
> Pet
- Original Message -
> From: "Marcela Mašláňová"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 7:45:46 PM
> Subject: Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock
> talk)
>
> On 07/23/2013 06:07 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> > Matthew Miller píše
- Original Message -
> From: "Peter MacKinnon"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 4:33:18 PM
> Subject: Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock
> talk)
>
> On 07/26/2013 05:23 AM, drago01 wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul
- Original Message -
> From: "Brendan Jones"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 12:31:25 PM
> Subject: Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock
> talk)
>
>
>
> On the other hand some projects might benefit from stable Ri
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
