----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthias Runge" <mru...@matthias-runge.de>
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" 
> <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:34:11 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
> 
> On 02/03/12 13:24, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Well, the whole idea came in a second so someone should refine it.
> > FWIW the period should be long enough - in my eyes not less than a
> > months so if noone responded in like 3 months the fix would no
> > longer
> > be at least quick. And as always we trust people to do the right
> > and
> > have a good understanding of their capabilities and knowledge. No
> > proposal/technology can prevent bad intentions.
> Yes, I guess, many people have very different time frame in their
> heads.
> 
> If we'd like to try this out, what would be the right way to propose
> this change?

I really have no idea nor I would have the time to deal with such thing anytime 
soon as it will also require development work if accepted. The current process 
works fine for me. I just wanted to show that there are better way than 
throwing out people.

Alex

> --
> Matthias Runge <mru...@matthias-runge.de>
>                <mru...@fedoraproject.org>
> 
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to