tartube: files not found after using pyproject_* macros

Hi, why is this error message displayed when compiling tartube [1] after using the pyproject_* macros: + desktop-file-validate /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/tartube-2.5.145-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/applications/tartube.desktop + RPM_EC=0 ++ jobs -p + exit 0 Processing files: tartube-2.5.145-1.fc

Re: tartube: files not found after using pyproject_* macros

On Wed, 16 Jul 2025, Martin Gansser wrote: Hi, why is this error message displayed when compiling tartube [1] after using the pyproject_* macros: RPM build errors: File not found: /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/tartube-2.5.145-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/pixmaps/tartube.* Directory not foun

Re: tartube: files not found after using pyproject_* macros

if I move export TARTUBE_PKG_STRICT=1 in front of the line %pyproject_wheel, I get the error message: RPM build errors: Directory not found: /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/tartube-2.5.145-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/tartube if I then comment in the %file section #%%{_datadir}/tartube/ I get this

Re: Introducing Provides bash(*)

On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 9:10 AM Cristian Le via devel wrote: > Thanks for that insight. It seems that the array is supported [1], and > the note is outdated? > > I can't read the bash script there well, but isn't the DEBUG trap also > not really conflicting [2]? > > [1]: https://github.com/rcalora

Re: Fedora Virtualization Maintainers account disabled in Bugzilla

On 7/15/25 5:24 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 5:03 PM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> On 15. 07. 25 12:00, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:48:50AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: >

Re: tartube: files not found after using pyproject_* macros

Hi, if you look here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_distro_wide_guidelines in the Mandatory macros section it explains the 'site-packages' dir. It is where all the pure python modules are installed and most likely it is where the pyproject_* macros install fil

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2025-07-17 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 US/Eastern At meet...@fedoraproject.org The meeting will be about: Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/11018/ -- ___ devel mailin

poppler soname bump in Rawhide

Hi, I've prepared rebase of poppler to 25.07.0, in the side tag "f43-build-side-115221". I'm asking you to build your dependent packages in it and I will merge it to the main buildroot at Tuesday (22nd of July) just before the mass rebuild. There are several API changes and soname bump of th

Re: tartube: files not found after using pyproject_* macros

On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 03:57:22PM +0200, Pavol Sloboda wrote: > Hi, > > if you look here: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_distro_wide_guidelines > in the Mandatory macros section it explains the 'site-packages' dir. It is > where all the pure python modules a

xen soname bump with 4.20.1 release

I have built an update of xen to the 4.20.1 release on rawhide in the f43-build-side-115239 side tag. I believe that the qemu, libvirt and collectd packages will need to be rebuilt in this side tag due to the version change on some of the xen libraries. Michael Young -- ___

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250716.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250715.n.2 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250716.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 118 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 318.30 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: Non-responsive maintainer rdieter

I've initiated a request also here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2381541 Has anyone been able to contact Rex? -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: tartube: files not found after using pyproject_* macros

On 2025/07/16 18:56, Brian C. Lane wrote: Projects using pyproject.toml cannot install arbitrary data outside of site-packages, except for script wrappers. That depends on the build backend. Setuptools still provides `|package-data` (or something along those lines) to install in the system p

Fedora eln compose report: 20250717.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-eln-20250716.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250717.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 49 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 5.48 MiB Size of dropped packages:507.77 KiB

AI-generated content in Fedora packages: do we have rules?

I noticed that AI-generated content has been added to a Fedora package: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pip/pull-request/157# Do we have rules about this? If not, should we? There are obvious concerns about whether such content is copyrightable (and the implications of that), and whet

Re: AI-generated content in Fedora packages: do we have rules?

On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 11:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > FYI, the council has been working on a policy... > > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/ai-policy-in-fedora-wip/144297/20 > The most interesting thing is that at this point the only approach is "it's complicated". That is both exciting,

Re: AI-generated content in Fedora packages: do we have rules?

On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 3:28 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > I noticed that AI-generated content has been added to a Fedora package: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pip/pull-request/157# > > Do we have rules about this? > No > If not, should we? Maybe? > There are obvious concerns

Re: AI-generated content in Fedora packages: do we have rules?

On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 12:27:42PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > I noticed that AI-generated content has been added to a Fedora package: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pip/pull-request/157# > > Do we have rules about this? > > If not, should we? FYI, the council has been workin