On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 9:10 AM Cristian Le via devel <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Thanks for that insight. It seems that the array is supported [1], and > the note is outdated? > > I can't read the bash script there well, but isn't the DEBUG trap also > not really conflicting [2]? > > [1]: https://github.com/rcaloras/bash-preexec/issues/130 > [2]: > https://github.com/rcaloras/bash-preexec/blob/e8e9024d4d101a69016169e46f5d75df3fdb7e32/bash-preexec.sh#L299-L310
Indeed, it seems that bash-preexec is prepared to be a good citizen with bash >= 5.1. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
