OLD: Fedora-eln-20250530.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250531.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 74
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:204.66 KiB
Size
On Thu, 2025-05-29 at 15:58 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Simo Sorce said:
> > On Thu, 2025-05-29 at 16:29 -0400, pgnd wrote:
> > > here, addition of `--no-best` is sufficient
> > >
> > >dnf config-manager setopt fedora-cisco-openh264.enabled=0
> > >dnf swap '*openh264*' n
On Sat, May 31, 2025, at 1:14 AM, pc_magas via devel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Its has been a while. 2 months ago I made a sponsorship request upon the
> mkdotenv a small utility for manipulating .env files:
>
> https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/707
>
> But I am not sure about what steps I need
I've asked https://superuser.com/q/1902987/904401 on your behalf. That's an
interesting question.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
htt
How can I tell my HW has this configuration?
I maintain a bunch of *very* old 64-bit CPU laptops at home and I can
at least test it on them to see if the issue is wide-spread or not, if
I would find any that has such HW setup.
Michal
--
Michal Schorm
Software Engineer
Databases Team
Red Hat
--
So during a recent Anaconda installer bug triage we encountered the
following bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366967
"Installation media is not recognised by the 32-bit EFI of the 64-bit-
CPU LINX 1010."
What it boils down is basically that Fedora 42 media apparently no
On 30-05-2025 10:27, Carl George wrote:
FYI, the epel-packagers-sig group is deprecated and should no longer
be added to packages.
Thank you for pointing that out. I didn't know. I wish I had or that it
had been pointed out when I did just that and mentioning doing so in
response to a few EPE
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 43 Rawhide 20250530.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
* Jason L. Tibbitts, III:
>> Neal Gompa writes:
>
>> The problem is that policy modules can depend on each other, and since
>> policy modules can add things both to the global store and to the pool
>> of stuff other modules can use, it has to be processed serially.
>
> Even then, semodule its
Hello!
We had recently changed how we handle debuginfo in JDK:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-latest-openjdk/pull-request/147#request_diff
Main change is, that we create debuginfo manually. Unluckily it was
developed with rpm 4.20, so it built fine in f41-f43, but during porting to
epels
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250529.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250530.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 42
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 360.41 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Vitaly Zaitsev wrote:
> On 29/05/2025 20:34, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > Swap to noopenh264 instead:
> > Since noopenh264 is just a shim, it can cause segfaults when playing
> H.264 videos, because ffmpeg was built with openh264 support.
> First, RPM Fusion's ffmpeg need to be rebuilt without openh2
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 11:49:37AM +0200, mkol...@redhat.com wrote:
> So during a recent Anaconda installer bug triage we encountered the
> following bug report:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366967
>
> "Installation media is not recognised by the 32-bit EFI of the 64-bit-
> CP
Hi,
On 30-May-25 11:49 AM, mkol...@redhat.com wrote:
> So during a recent Anaconda installer bug triage we encountered the
> following bug report:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366967
>
> "Installation media is not recognised by the 32-bit EFI of the 64-bit-
> CPU LINX 1010."
Hi,
On 30-May-25 3:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 12:25:39PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote:
>> How can I tell my HW has this configuration?
>
> 'bootctl' prints the firmware architecture. I don't have a 32-bit
> version at hand to test, but in principle it should
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 5:50 AM wrote:
>
> So during a recent Anaconda installer bug triage we encountered the
> following bug report:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366967
>
> "Installation media is not recognised by the 32-bit EFI of the 64-bit-
> CPU LINX 1010."
>
> What it bo
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 12:25:39PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote:
> How can I tell my HW has this configuration?
'bootctl' prints the firmware architecture. I don't have a 32-bit
version at hand to test, but in principle it should work.
$ bootctl | head -n3
System:
Firmware: UEFI 2.70 (Lenovo
Hello maintainers,
I'm happy to share that we now have a Konflux Pipeline for building Fedora
packages. Ralph wrote a blog post about it today on the containers-sig:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/konflux-fedora-update-may-2025/154784
The code lives here:
https://gitlab.com/fed
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 12:12:32PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Leigh Scott said:
> > Try
> >
> > sudo dnf swap *\openh264\* noopenh264
>
> Despite the same "conflicting requests" message, that does it:
>
> ***
Indeed, I was added as a co-maintainer originally to take care of the
EPEL 10 build. I'm happy to be set as the default EPEL bugzilla
assignee, I just can't do it myself since only the main admin can do
that.
FYI, the epel-packagers-sig group is deprecated and should no longer
be added to package
Looks good to me.
I have this in MySQL:
/usr/bin/kill -USR1 $(systemctl show --property MainPID --value mysqld)
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mysql8.4/blob/e1dd80/f/mysql-flush-logrotate.patch#_33
but the 'systemctl kill' looks like an elegant update I can use.
Michal
--
Michal Schorm
On 5/30/25 03:55, Sandro wrote:
On 30-05-2025 10:27, Carl George wrote:
FYI, the epel-packagers-sig group is deprecated and should no longer
be added to packages.
Thank you for pointing that out. I didn't know. I wish I had or that it
had been pointed out when I did just that and mentioning d
Hello,
Its has been a while. 2 months ago I made a sponsorship request upon the
mkdotenv a small utility for manipulating .env files:
https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/707
But I am not sure about what steps I need to do from my part in order
this package be fully intergrated with fed
23 matches
Mail list logo
