Hello! We had recently changed how we handle debuginfo in JDK: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-latest-openjdk/pull-request/147#request_diff Main change is, that we create debuginfo manually. Unluckily it was developed with rpm 4.20, so it built fine in f41-f43, but during porting to epels, I found it build in none. Just for curiosity I tried also in f40, and it failed too. So my guessing pointed to rpm 4.20.
The failure in f41/epels is, that they ignore the manual %package debuginfo (debugsource seems fine) and insted they later print: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/jvm/java-24-openjdk/bin/jar.debuginfo /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/jvm/java-24-openjdk/bin/jarsigner.debuginfo /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/jvm/java-24-openjdk/bin/java.debuginfo /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/jvm/java-24-openjdk/bin/javac.debuginfo .... Which is contnet of my debugfiles.list, which is in 4.20 correctly used. In logs is visible that the debuginfo subpkg is not processed at all: ok: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=133271306 not ok: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=133347836 Anybody any thoughts please? TY! J.
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
