OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250308.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250309.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 57
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 375.77 KiB
Size of dropped packages
# F42 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2025-03-10
# Time: **16:00** UTC
# Location:
https://matrix.to/#/#blocker-review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=chat.fedoraproject.org
Hi folks! It's time for a Fedora 42 blocker review meeting! We have 4
proposed blockers and 3 proposed freeze exce
On Sun, Mar 9, 2025, at 9:00 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well, you don't need to deploy it for yourself, really. There is a
> public test Fedora deployment where you can play with it:
>
> https://github.com/konflux-ci/community/blob/main/sigs/fedora/cluster.md
I know you're probably not the righ
On Sun, Mar 9, 2025 at 7:35 PM Michel Lind wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 9:46 PM, Peter Boy Uni wrote:
> >> Am 09.03.2025 um 00:44 schrieb Chris Adams :
> >>
> >> Once upon a time, Peter Boy Uni said:
> >>> We have a Forgejo rpm in the Fedora f41 repository, version 10 for
> >>> x86_64.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 9:46 PM, Peter Boy Uni wrote:
>> Am 09.03.2025 um 00:44 schrieb Chris Adams :
>>
>> Once upon a time, Peter Boy Uni said:
>>> We have a Forgejo rpm in the Fedora f41 repository, version 10 for x86_64.
>>> A aarch64 variant is currently missing (there is, however, a vers
Ahead of the F42 Beta Blocker meeting[1] tomorrow, Monday March 10 and
the F42 Beta Go/No-Go meeting[2] on Thursday, March 13, please review
the below report on current F42 Beta blockers[3]. Your help discussing
and resolving any outstanding bugs would be greatly appreciated.
Action summary
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 7:40 AM Filip Bartmann wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I mean, that in gdm aren't listed other X11 sessions such as IceWM and
> others. So GDM don't support these sessions in future? So I must switch to
> lightdm?
>
Yes. You can use LightDM if you need to use X11 sessions.
--
真実はい
On Sat, 2025-03-08 at 11:31 -0800, Michel Lind wrote:
> If this is both too heavy to evaluate on recent hardware, and also not
> reproducibly deployable, it seems to currently be in a state where it has all
> the drawbacks of Kubernetes but none of the benefits yet? Maybe we should get
> to a po
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250309.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250310.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 4
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.62 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
