On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 9:46 PM, Peter Boy Uni wrote:
>> Am 09.03.2025 um 00:44 schrieb Chris Adams <li...@cmadams.net>:
>> 
>> Once upon a time, Peter Boy Uni <p...@uni-bremen.de> said:
>>> We have a Forgejo rpm in the Fedora f41 repository, version 10 for x86_64. 
>>> A aarch64 variant is currently missing (there is, however, a version 9 in 
>>> COPR).
>> 
>> As far as I can tell, that's not true.  I'm not sure where you found it,
>> but there's no Forgejo RPMs in the standard Fedora repos, just the
>> python API client library (python-pyforgejo).
>
> You are right. I removed the COPR forgejo repo from /etc/yum.d but 
> missed that the forgejo rpm was still there. So a ‚dnf search forgejo‘ 
> still found it. And I happily assumed it was in the Fedora repo.
>
>
>> There appear to be a number of COPR repos with Forgejo, looks like most
>> have expected setup steps on the COPR page for it.  If that's where you
>> got it, you should probably start with what the packager says there.
>
> Yes, the mdwalters:forgejo seemed to me to be the most advanced 
> version, measured by the number of downloads and the documentation. But 
> it's probably not. 
>

We should probably try and get this into Fedora proper, right? Ideally 
everything needed by Fedora infrastructure is in Fedora itself, it took us a 
few years to get there with mailman so the earlier we start the better

Best regards,

-- 
 _o) Michel Lind
_( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
     README:     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Salimma#README
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to