On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 6:27 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 12:57 PM Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>>
>> With all this in mind, the big question is: When and how is it the right
>> time to officially bring up Konflux in the Fedora community context? If it
>> happens too early, it won’
Once upon a time, Peter Boy Uni said:
> We have a Forgejo rpm in the Fedora f41 repository, version 10 for x86_64. A
> aarch64 variant is currently missing (there is, however, a version 9 in
> COPR).
As far as I can tell, that's not true. I'm not sure where you found it,
but there's no Forgej
On Sat, 2025-03-08 at 11:46 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> torque
torque was retired and already don't have f42 branch , the build was
made before f42 branch on rawhide . At first glance the retirement of
the package seem that isn't complete
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
> Am 09.03.2025 um 00:44 schrieb Chris Adams :
>
> Once upon a time, Peter Boy Uni said:
>> We have a Forgejo rpm in the Fedora f41 repository, version 10 for x86_64. A
>> aarch64 variant is currently missing (there is, however, a version 9 in
>> COPR).
>
> As far as I can tell, that's not t
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 07:27:59AM -0800, Michel Lind wrote:
> - how easy is it to bootstrap the different options (Konflux, Koji, OBS etc)?
> - how easy is it to run each locally for those who want to dogfood the
> process or participate in development?
I'm not sure it's really necessary to run
On Sat, Mar 8, 2025 at 10:24 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 07:27:59AM -0800, Michel Lind wrote:
> > - how easy is it to bootstrap the different options (Konflux, Koji, OBS
> > etc)?
> > - how easy is it to run each locally for those who want to dogfood the
> > process
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 08:58:09AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 09:56:43AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 05. 03. 25 9:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > Hmm, this seems to be an unfinished retirement. We have
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/r
On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 10:39 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2025 at 10:24 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 07:27:59AM -0800, Michel Lind wrote:
>> > - how easy is it to bootstrap the different options (Konflux, Koji, OBS
>> > etc)?
>> > - how easy is it to run
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250307.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250308.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 167
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 851.54 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Miroslav Suchý kirjoitti 4.3.2025 klo 17.24:
Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
distro-sync
This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal
poten
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 11:31:54AM -0800, Michel Lind wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 10:39 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 8, 2025 at 10:24 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 07:27:59AM -0800, Michel Lind wrote:
> >> > - how easy is it to bootstrap th
We have a Forgejo rpm in the Fedora f41 repository, version 10 for x86_64. A
aarch64 variant is currently missing (there is, however, a version 9 in COPR).
I tried to install it on my Fedora Server test instance to check how it goes.
The rpm doesn’t create a working directory, e.g. /var/lib/for
On Fri, Mar 7, 2025, at 9:56 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> With all this in mind, the big question is: When and how is it the
> right time to officially bring up Konflux in the Fedora community
> context?
When it can be used (tested) by Fedora contributors as part of their normal
workflows. I do
OLD: Fedora-42-20250307.n.0
NEW: Fedora-42-20250308.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 2:50 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I didn't watch his talk, but this all sounds very vague. And that the
> fact that it's "container first" and an internal project first is
> worrying too.
One very important thing to understand here is that Konflux is built on *top*
o
On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 12:57 PM Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>
> With all this in mind, the big question is: When and how is it the right time
> to officially bring up Konflux in the Fedora community context? If it happens
> too early, it won’t look credible or be useful. If it happens too late, there
On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 8:50 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 12:56:21PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>>
>> A few weeks back I started a discussion about accidental secrets,
>> using Konflux as an example. Now that FOSDEM has come and gone, I’d
>> like to take the topic fur
Hi Antonio,
First of all, welcome!
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025, at 7:27 AM, Antonio wrote:
> Hi Dan!
>
> This is indeed appreciated. No better sponsor!
>
> This will be my first contribution. I've read [1] and followed all
> instructions there, but I'm stuck. What should I do now?
Because the package h
18 matches
Mail list logo
