Hi,
I updated openh264 to version 2.6.0 in rawhide in order to fix some
security issues. This change however comes with an SO bump and it would
require rebuilds of affected packages.
I have made a build of the new openh264 in a side tag f43-build-side-106953
It looks like these packages will nee
The QEMU community is discussing possible use of -gsplit-dwarf as a default
option for QEMU's build system:
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2025-03/msg00424.html
This option causes debug symbols to be written to separate .dwo files
instead of the .o files or final executables.
mozilla-openh264 is a subpackages of openh264
Dennis
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 5:40 AM Wim Taymans wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I updated openh264 to version 2.6.0 in rawhide in order to fix some security
> issues. This change however comes with an SO bump and it would require
> rebuilds of affected packag
Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best distro-sync
This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal
potential problems.
You may also run `dnf upgrade` bef
Tested on three machines running Fedora 41; two of them were a-okay, one had
some errors:
> Problem 1: installed package libreoffice-writer2latex-1.0.2-38.fc37.x86_64
> requires osgi(javax.xml), but none of the providers can be installed
> - xml-commons-apis-1.4.01-47.fc41.noarch does not belon
Wim Taymans wrote:
> Hi,
> I updated openh264 to version 2.6.0 in rawhide in order to fix some
> noopenh264
> Wim
You will need to update noopenh264 to match openh264
https://gitlab.com/freedesktop-sdk/noopenh264/-/tags
--
___
devel mailing list --
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 11:44:18AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> The QEMU community is discussing possible use of -gsplit-dwarf as a default
> option for QEMU's build system:
>
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2025-03/msg00424.html
>
> This option causes debug symbols to b
On Tue, Mar 4 2025 at 02:46:12 PM -00:00:00, Leigh Scott
wrote:
You will need to update noopenh264 to match openh264
Yes, noopenh264 is what packages are actually built against. We'll need
to do a new noopenh264 build using f43-build-side-106953 first, then
once that's finished other maintai
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025, at 7:14 PM, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 7:54 PM Benson Muite
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Fedora has a policy to support only one kernel. Projects such as
>> OpenHarmony support multiple kernels to enable reuse of components on
>> devices with a wide range of com
Here's what im seeing
[sudo] password for ox:
Updating and loading repositories:
created by dnf config-manager from
https://repo.nordvpn.com//yum/nordvpn/centos/x86_64
100% | 6.4 KiB/s | 1.5 KiB | 00m00s
Unity Hub
Hi,
scummvm-2.9.0:
- added: BSL-1.0
- now:
License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ AND
LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD AND LicenseRef-Callaway-OFL and
LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT and ISC and Catharon AND Apache-2.0 AND
BSL-1.0
scummvm-tools-2.9.0
- added: BSD-2-Clause
- now:
License:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 7:54 PM Benson Muite wrote:
>
>
> Fedora has a policy to support only one kernel. Projects such as OpenHarmony
> support multiple kernels to enable reuse of components on devices with a wide
> range of compute capabilities - in particular mobile and edge devices. Is
>
Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
and try to run:
dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
distro-sync
I was surprised by 16 detected downgrades.
Downgrading: (Consecutive spaces are collapsed to avoid line wrap):
criu x86_
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 10:15:56AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 04. 03. 25 v 7:29 dop. Peter Hutterer napsal(a):
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This feels like it should be easy but I can't seem to figure it out.
> > Two weeks ago my custom build script started failing:
> > https://copr.fedorainfraclou
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250304.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250305.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 51
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Tuesday, 04 March 2025 at 23:55, Christian Krause wrote:
> Hi,
>
> scummvm-2.9.0:
> - added: BSL-1.0
> - now:
> License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ AND
> LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD AND LicenseRef-Callaway-OFL and
> LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT and ISC and Catharon AND Apache
Hi!
I did a license review of the ags package (to get rid of the
LicenseRef-* tags) and arrived at this new SPDX expression for the ags
package:
Artistic-2.0 AND LicenseRef-Fedora-UltraPermissive AND FTL AND MPEG-SSG
AND Apache-2.0 AND MIT-Khronos-old AND Zlib AND MIT AND BSD-2-Clause AND
CC0-1.0
Fedora people in Switzerland might be interested in this:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/is-there-a-fedora-switzerland-zurich/116840/5
The idea is inspired by the UK, in which we evolved to the UK SIG with its occasional
meetups and regular exchange among its members, both locally and o
OLD: Fedora-42-20250303.n.0
NEW: Fedora-42-20250304.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 72
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 122.03 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Dne 04. 03. 25 v 7:29 dop. Peter Hutterer napsal(a):
Hi all,
This feels like it should be easy but I can't seem to figure it out.
Two weeks ago my custom build script started failing:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/whot/libinput-git/builds/
The failing part is... the mockbuild command?
here is mine:
no problem found here only protonvpn repo not available for fedora 42
and mysql-connector-odbc
[sudo] password for hhlp:
Updating and loading repositories:
keybase 100% | 36.8 KiB/s | 3.5 KiB | 00m00s
Hashicorp Stable - x86_64 ???% | 576.0 B/s | 314.0 B | 00m01s
>>> St
Meeting summary
---
* TOPIC: Init Process (@humaton:fedora.im, 17:00:17)
* TOPIC: 3347 RFC: Schedule checkpoint for landing major toolchain upgrades
(@humaton:fedora.im, 17:04:45)
* TOPIC: Proposal: Major toolchain upgrades must land at least 7 days before
the scheduled start of the
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 8:16 AM Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 7:54 PM Benson Muite
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Fedora has a policy to support only one kernel. Projects such as
> > OpenHarmony support multiple kernels to enable reuse of components on
> > devices with a wide range of
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 4:26 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
> distro-sync
>
> This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it
I had the hsakmt-devel problem too, so I opened
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rocm-runtime/pull-request/11.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025, at 2:54 PM, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> On 3/4/25 10:24 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your t
I only found one issue and that is just due to me not using RPM fusion Repo
for nvidia drivers instead depending on negativo17s Nvidia drivers
Repositories loaded.
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: installed package nvidia-driver-cuda-3:570.124.04-1.fc41.x86_64
requires nvidia-persistenc
The new noopenh264 is now available in the side tag. Packagers, please
start your builds!
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https:/
On 3/4/25 10:24 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
distro-sync
dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
distro-syn
no issues here
Intel (RKL, 11 th. Gen.), running Gnome and Xorg
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/p
29 matches
Mail list logo
