Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250223.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250222.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250223.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 9 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 33 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 114.77 KiB Size of dropped packages

python-progressbar2 v4.5.0 coming to F42 and rawhide

Hi all, Just a quick heads up. I'm looking to update python-progressbar2 to v4.5.0 in F42 and rawhide. I have a PR ready here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-progressbar2/pull-request/7 The following packages depend on it: *** osc-1.12.1-432.1.1.fc43.noarch *** python3-progressbar2

Re: Multiple kernels

On Sun, Feb 23, 2025, at 9:55 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 2/22/25 6:50 PM, Benson Muite wrote: >> >> Fedora has a policy to support only one kernel. Projects such as >> OpenHarmony support multiple kernels to enable reuse of components on >> devices with a wide range of compute capabilities -

Re: Multiple kernels

Em dom., 23 de fev. de 2025, 16:15, Richard W.M. Jones escreveu: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 09:14:21PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025, at 9:55 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > On 2/22/25 6:50 PM, Benson Muite wrote: > > >> > > >> Fedora has a policy to support only one ker

Re: Proposal: Allow all packagers to push empty commits to any package

On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 11:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I still think we should always require a changelog entry, so that that > the reason for the rebuild is always explicit. > > (In the normal case, there should never be a need for "trivial" > rebuilds, and rebuilds should be for

Re: Need help with "cannot open display" error when %pyproject_check_import is run

On 2/23/25 7:14 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: That is what I ended up doing and it is indeed unfortunate, we don't have that many packages with so thorough testing. I will get in touch with upstream about a couple of regressions and I will bring up the issues with the tests when I do. Do you w

Re: Follow-up on Fedora Aide Project Bug Report

Thank you for your response. I still have some questions regarding the issue with the patch *aide-verbose.patch*. You mentioned that it is easy to verify if the patch gets applied and that it is a revert. However, I am unsure why the following issues are not causing any errors during compilation:

Re: Follow-up on Fedora Aide Project Bug Report

On Mon, 2025-02-24 at 11:59 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On 24/2/25 11:07, Jian Peng wrote: > > Dear Fedora Development Team, > > I hope this email finds you well. > > I have submitted a bug report on Fedora's Bugzilla regarding an issue > > with the Aide project (ID: 2346091 > >

Fedora 42 compose report: 20250223.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-42-20250222.n.0 NEW: Fedora-42-20250223.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Multiple kernels

On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 09:14:21PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025, at 9:55 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 2/22/25 6:50 PM, Benson Muite wrote: > >> > >> Fedora has a policy to support only one kernel. Projects such as > >> OpenHarmony support multiple kernels to enable re

Re: Proposal: Allow all packagers to push empty commits to any package

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 06:27:42PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 5:13 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 21. 02. 25 12:41, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 1:17 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > >> > > >> Hello. > > >> > > >> With the recent discussions about

Re: Proposal: Allow all packagers to push empty commits to any package

On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 09:06:15AM -0500, Ben Beasley wrote: > I would also point out that incompatible updates are still supposed to be > announced a week in advance, with all impacted packages’ maintainers CC’ed > or BCC’ed. This allows a week for someone to read their email and speak up > about

Re: Proposal: Allow all packagers to push empty commits to any package

On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 5:22 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 09:06:15AM -0500, Ben Beasley wrote: > > I would also point out that incompatible updates are still supposed to be > > announced a week in advance, with all impacted packages’ maintainers CC’ed > > or BC

Re: Need help with "cannot open display" error when %pyproject_check_import is run

Thank you very much for taking the time to look into this Ben. On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 1:08 PM Ben Beasley wrote: > > I gather that you have already found that this will work for the > import-only "smoke test": > > # Make sure everything is at least importable. Skip > # inputremapper.bi

Follow-up on Fedora Aide Project Bug Report

Dear Fedora Development Team, I hope this email finds you well. I have submitted a bug report on Fedora's Bugzilla regarding an issue with the Aide project (ID: 2346091 ), which involves a patch fix and modification for the project. As I have not

Fedora eln compose report: 20250224.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-eln-20250223.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250224.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 11 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: Follow-up on Fedora Aide Project Bug Report

On 24/2/25 11:07, Jian Peng wrote: Dear Fedora Development Team, I hope this email finds you well. I have submitted a bug report on Fedora's Bugzilla regarding an issue with the Aide project (ID: 2346091 ), which involves a patch fix and mod