On 2/23/25 7:14 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
That is what I ended up doing and it is indeed unfortunate, we don't
have that many packages with so thorough testing. I will get in touch
with upstream about a couple of regressions and I will bring up the
issues with the tests when I do. Do you want me to cc you in the
discussion?
Either way is OK with me. I am willing to put a reasonable effort into
helping out, but I don’t have much interest in the package *per se*. I
think I originally got involved with running more tests in
input-remapper while I was impact-checking
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Update_To_Pydantic_Version_2.
Best regards,
A.
P.S.: the source file for the update was already in the lookaside
cache when I tried to upload it. Is there a way to see how it got
there?
Not that I know of, but you will only get that message if the SHA-512
checksum (not just the name) matches what you’re trying to upload, so
you needn’t worry that the tarball has different contents. It’s possible
that I might have uploaded it while experimenting with the tests – I
don’t really remember.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
