Re: libnfs soname bump

2025-02-18 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 11:51:47PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > Le 2025-02-18 15:38, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit : > >On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16. > >> > >>Affected packages are: > >>gvfs > >>qemu >

Heads-up: abseil-cpp 20250127.0 coming to F43/Rawhide

2025-02-18 Thread Ben Beasley
In one week, 2025-02-25, or slightly later, I plan to update abseil-cpp from 20240722.1 to 20250127.0 (Abseil LTS branch, January 2025)[1] in side tags for F43/Rawhide. Like all new calendar versions of abseil-cpp, this breaks ABI compatibility and bumps the SONAME version[2]. Testing in COPR[

Re: libnfs soname bump

2025-02-18 Thread Xavier Bachelot via devel
Le 2025-02-18 23:51, Xavier Bachelot a écrit : I have not heard of the maintainers of the 2 RPM Fusion packages, I'll look at this next. Anyway, the side tags are ready to be merged as far as Fedora is concerned, so I'll do that soon. Both mpd and kodi have a fix : - https://github.com/MusicP

Re: libnfs soname bump

2025-02-18 Thread Xavier Bachelot via devel
Le 2025-02-18 15:38, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit : On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote: Hi, libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16. Affected packages are: gvfs qemu vlc xine-lib kodi (RPM Fusion) mpd (RPM Fusion) ... and this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

Fedora eln compose report: 20250219.n.0 changes

2025-02-18 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250218.n.2 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250219.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 65 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: Need help with "cannot open display" error when %pyproject_check_import is run

2025-02-18 Thread Ben Beasley
I gather that you have already found that this will work for the import-only "smoke test":     # Make sure everything is at least importable. Skip     # inputremapper.bin.input_remapper_gtk because it requires a display.     %pyproject_check_import -e inputremapper.bin.input_remapper_gtk I spen

RE: Packaging Radeon ProRender addon for Blender

2025-02-18 Thread Rix, Tom via devel
[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only] I am unable to follow the COPR link to the package, can you send them to me directly ? I am more familiar with ROCm than the rendering side of AMD products but would like to help. Tom From: Luya Tshimbalanga Sent: Monday, February 17, 2

Re: Packaging Radeon ProRender addon for Blender

2025-02-18 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Here is the spec file of Radeon ProRender addon for Blender 3D: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@designsuite/blender/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08665473-python-blender-radeon-prorender-addon/python-blender-radeon-prorender-addon.spec On 2025-02-18 05:10, Rix, Tom wrote: [AMD Offic

Inactive Packagers Policy for the F42 cycle

2025-02-18 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after the final release, packagers who remain inactive will be removed from the packager group. (Note that pagure.io is one of the

Fedora 42 Beta Freeze and Bodhi updates-testing activation point

2025-02-18 Thread Samyak Jain via devel-announce
Hi all, Today's an important day on the Fedora Linux 42 schedule [1], with several significant cut-offs. First of all, today is the Bodhi updates-testing activation point [2]. That means that from now all Fedora Linux 42 packages must be submitted to updates-testing and pass the relevant requireme

Fedora eln compose report: 20250218.n.2 changes

2025-02-18 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250217.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250218.n.2 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 53 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:4.48 MiB Size of

Re: Rust SIG Spring Cleaning - 2025 Edition

2025-02-18 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:21 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Otherwise I plan to retire any Rust packages that are > - library-only / source-only and > - have been unused leaf packages for 365+ days and > - have no documented reason for why they are still needed > before the F42 Beta Freeze takes eff

Re: [Need help] Issue Authorizing fedpkg push in a Container.

2025-02-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 08:32:10AM +, Hangbin Liu wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Apologies if I’m sending this to the wrong list. > > I’m facing an issue authorizing fedpkg push inside a container. When I run > the command, it provides a link for authorization. However, after logging in, > the

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for ret2libc

2025-02-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
(adding maintainer to cc) On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 03:03:10PM +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > we are trying to get a rebuild of rizin [1] but the maintainer doesn't react. > Same applies to the co-maintainer. I've created a non-responsive maintainer > bugzilla ticket at [2]. > > > Be

Fedora 42 compose report: 20250218.n.0 changes

2025-02-18 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-42-20250217.n.0 NEW: Fedora-42-20250218.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 69 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 13.76 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Non-responsive maintainer check for ret2libc

2025-02-18 Thread Andreas Schneider
Hi, we are trying to get a rebuild of rizin [1] but the maintainer doesn't react. Same applies to the co-maintainer. I've created a non-responsive maintainer bugzilla ticket at [2]. Best regards Andreas [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346253 [2] https://src.fedorapr

Re: libnfs soname bump

2025-02-18 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > Hi, > > libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16. > > Affected packages are: > gvfs > qemu > vlc > xine-lib > kodi (RPM Fusion) > mpd (RPM Fusion) ... and this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331668 Hi Xavi

Cancelled: FESCo Meeting (2025-02-18)

2025-02-18 Thread Jednorozec
I am canceling today's meeting. There are few open tickets, that does not require us to sit in a meeting. I'll chair the meeting the next week. = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = Change: Switch to EROFS for Live Media https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3356 APPROVED now. (+4, 0, -0) = Followup

Re: libnfs soname bump

2025-02-18 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 02:38:14PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > > Hi, > > > > libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16. > > > > Affected packages are: > > gvfs > > qemu > > vlc > > xine-lib > > kodi (RPM Fusion) > > mpd (

Re: [Need help] Issue Authorizing fedpkg push in a Container.

2025-02-18 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 09:32 +0100, Hangbin Liu wrote: > Is there any other way to push my new code to the RPM repository? Hi, I usually run: kinit u...@fedoraproject.org before using any fedpkg command which requires the user credentials and then it works fine. I do not know whether i

Re: Need help with "cannot open display" error when %pyproject_check_import is run

2025-02-18 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 02:17:49AM +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to build the latest version of input-remapper[1] and I > guess some change to the test units has led to this error: > > […] > + /usr/bin/python3 -sP /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py -f > /build

[Need help] Issue Authorizing fedpkg push in a Container.

2025-02-18 Thread Hangbin Liu
Hi everyone, Apologies if I’m sending this to the wrong list. I’m facing an issue authorizing fedpkg push inside a container. When I run the command, it provides a link for authorization. However, after logging in, the link redirects to a localhost address, which is unreachable since I’m running

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250218.n.0 changes

2025-02-18 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250217.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250218.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 102 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 13.62 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: Gating Fedora updates on Fedora CoreOS CI

2025-02-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2025-02-17 at 21:22 -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > On 2/17/25 1:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2025-02-17 at 10:35 -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > > > > > One more question: are packagers able to restart the tests? > > > > > > > > > > > > @Dusty Mabe