Fedora rawhide compose report: 20241129.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20241129.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20241129.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 4 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: Building mixxx for ppc64le (f40)

On Thursday, 28 November 2024 at 23:03, Luis Correia wrote: > Hi, > > I was running the build processes for Mixxx 2.4.2 release on RPMFusion Instead of updating it in RPM Fusion, please move it over to Fedora. All its mandatory dependencies are in Fedora already. The only optional one that is mis

Re: Building mixxx for ppc64le (f40)

If I could get help in moving to Fedora, I'm more then happy to do it. I'll need some help on 'how', can you please point me to the correct documentation? A sexta, 29/11/2024, 08:38, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> escreveu: > On Thursday, 28 November 2024 at 23:03, Luis

Re: Building mixxx for ppc64le (f40)

On Friday, 29 November 2024 at 09:44, Luis Correia wrote: > If I could get help in moving to Fedora, I'm more then happy to do it. Sure. Once the package is submitted for review, please block the MultimediaSIG tracker bug and one of the SIG members will try to do the review as soon as they can. >

Re: Rawhide right now: a weirdness omnishambles

I just created a Fedora VM and updated it to Rawhide (didn't want to risk my actual Rawhide machine if the new kernel is dodgy!) It has to be said I don't see anything unusual so far. I was able to install many new packages through 'dnf', so filesystem writes are likely working. I've got a kerne

Re: Rawhide right now: a weirdness omnishambles

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 12:38:43PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I just created a Fedora VM and updated it to Rawhide (didn't want to > risk my actual Rawhide machine if the new kernel is dodgy!) > > It has to be said I don't see anything unusual so far. I was able to > install many new pack

Re: Proposed qemu-srpm-macros

On 28. 11. 24 23:49, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 4:30 AM Florian Weimer wrote: * Richard W. M. Jones: One question is whether it's better to add this as a sub-package of qemu, or as a new source package. Using a new source package means we won't be introducing awkward circular

Re: Proposed qemu-srpm-macros

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:36:44PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 28. 11. 24 23:49, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 4:30 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > > > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > > > > > One question is whether it's better to add this as a sub-package of > > > > qemu, or a

Re: Rawhide right now: a weirdness omnishambles

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 12:54:35PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 12:38:43PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I just created a Fedora VM and updated it to Rawhide (didn't want to > > risk my actual Rawhide machine if the new kernel is dodgy!) > > > > It has to be sa

Re: Proposed qemu-srpm-macros

* Daniel P. Berrangé: > I think I'd prefer to stay away from redhat-rpm-config. Not because it > is a problem in Fedora, but because it will cause us pain downstream > to deal with RHEL development process bureaucracy to commit changes > into a package we don't directly own as virt maintainers. H

Re: small problem with vendored deps in rust packages

On 28. 11. 24 0:34, Kalev Lember wrote: On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 12:23 AM Kalev Lember > wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 11:56 PM Fabio Valentini mailto:decatho...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 11:50 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek mai

Re: Proposed qemu-srpm-macros

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Daniel P. Berrangé: > > > I think I'd prefer to stay away from redhat-rpm-config. Not because it > > is a problem in Fedora, but because it will cause us pain downstream > > to deal with RHEL development process bureaucracy to com

Re: Proposed qemu-srpm-macros

On 29. 11. 24 15:47, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:36:44PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 28. 11. 24 23:49, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 4:30 AM Florian Weimer wrote: * Richard W. M. Jones: One question is whether it's better to add this as a sub-package of

Re: Proposed qemu-srpm-macros

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:49:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 29. 11. 24 15:47, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > >On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:36:44PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >>On 28. 11. 24 23:49, Neal Gompa wrote: > >>>On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 4:30 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > * Richard W. M.

Re: Proposed qemu-srpm-macros

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:48:02PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Daniel P. Berrangé: > > > > > I think I'd prefer to stay away from redhat-rpm-config. Not because it > > > is a problem in Fedora, but because it will cause u

Re: Proposed qemu-srpm-macros

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:02:43PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:48:02PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > * Daniel P. Berrangé: > > > > > > > I think I'd prefer to stay away from redhat-rpm-co

Re: Proposed qemu-srpm-macros

* Daniel P. Berrangé: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:48:02PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> > * Daniel P. Berrangé: >> > >> > > I think I'd prefer to stay away from redhat-rpm-config. Not because it >> > > is a problem in Fedor

Re: Proposed qemu-srpm-macros

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:16:51PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:02:43PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:48:02PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > * Daniel P.

Re: Proposed qemu-srpm-macros

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 11:39 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:16:51PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:02:43PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:48:02PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 2

Orphaning fedora-business-cards

Package uses old fedora account system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237 -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://do

License change for clpeak

Hi all, clpeak 1.1.3, which has just landed in Rawhide, is changing its license from Unlicense to Apache-2.0. Upstream commit: https://github.com/krrishnarraj/clpeak/commit/65e572451330b4673712dfec352842f3123a9258 Regards, -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org Deep in the human unconscious is a

Re: Rawhide right now: a weirdness omnishambles

On Fri, 2024-11-29 at 15:28 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 12:54:35PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 12:38:43PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > I just created a Fedora VM and updated it to Rawhide (didn't want to > > > risk my actual

Re: Unresponsive maintainer for Fedora-EPEL python-django3

Hello Michel and Neal, firstly Michel thanks to work on the PR. Secondly I'm sorry to hear about the false positives. May I have your help sending some recent examples of such cases off-list please? I'm interested in investigating that so we can improve such communication avoiding false positives

Re: Retiring schroedinger

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Dirac codec support is optional in the above. It still means that the claim that nothing is using this library anymore is false. Kevin Kofler -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org T

Re: pkcs11-provider update breaks eduroam

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 11:27 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20 2024 at 04:03:27 PM +01:00:00, Clemens Lang > wrote: > > That was the case with openssl-pkcs11 (the package that contains the > > OpenSSL PKCS#11 ENGINE) for years. > > The use of PKCS#11 tokens is not very common. I don

Re: pkcs11-provider update breaks eduroam

Michael Catanzaro wrote: > * We do expect smartcards to work on immutable systems where > installing extra packages is either inconvenient (Silverblue and > Kinoite require overlays) or not possible (future Fedoras, hopefully) Quite a distopian future you paint there! My vision of the future does

Fedora eln compose report: 20241130.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-eln-20241129.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20241130.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 46 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 50.36 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of