Fedora CoreOS Community Meeting Minutes 2024-11-20

2024-11-20 Thread Timothée Ravier
Text Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-11-20/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-11-20-16.30.log.txt HTML Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-11-20/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-11-20-16.30.log.html Text Minutes: https://me

License change for dataquay

2024-11-20 Thread Michel Lind
Hi all, In the pre-SPDX days I marked the dataquay package as being MIT licensed, since that seems to be the closest fit. When updating it in Rawhide just now, I double checked the license with the SPDX license tool, and turns out it's X11-distribute-modifications-variant It's in our allowed lis

Re: pkcs11-provider update breaks eduroam

2024-11-20 Thread Clemens Lang
Hi, > On 19. Nov 2024, at 17:47, Arthur Bols wrote: > > A few days ago pkcs11-provider-0.5-3.fc41 update was pushed to Fedora 41. > Unfortunately, this update breaks eduroam and possibly many other > WPA2-Enterprise wifi networks. There are multiple threads on Fedora > Discussion, mainly [0],

Re: Findings by static analyzers in Fedora 42 Critical Path Packages

2024-11-20 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 06:53:59AM +0100, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote: > - The issue of false positives is one of the most important, but hard > to solve. I started a discussion[2] on GitHub, but we do not have a > good answer to it yet. If you have ideas, please share on GitHub. Hi, This was alread

Re: pkcs11-provider update breaks eduroam

2024-11-20 Thread Dmitry Belyavskiy
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:38 AM Davide Caratti wrote: > hi, > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:09 AM Clemens Lang wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > On 19. Nov 2024, at 17:47, Arthur Bols wrote: > > > > > > A few days ago pkcs11-provider-0.5-3.fc41 update was pushed to Fedora > 41. Unfortunately, this u

Re: Findings by static analyzers in Fedora 42 Critical Path Packages

2024-11-20 Thread František Šumšal
On 11/19/24 18:07, David Malcolm wrote: On Tue, 2024-11-19 at 17:25 +0100, František Šumšal wrote: On 11/19/24 10:22, František Šumšal wrote: On 11/19/24 09:07, Kamil Dudka wrote: On Monday, November 18, 2024 6:57:03 PM GMT+1 František Šumšal wrote: Right after I sent this I got a response

Re: pkcs11-provider update breaks eduroam

2024-11-20 Thread Davide Caratti
hi, On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:09 AM Clemens Lang wrote: > > Hi, > > > On 19. Nov 2024, at 17:47, Arthur Bols wrote: > > > > A few days ago pkcs11-provider-0.5-3.fc41 update was pushed to Fedora 41. > > Unfortunately, this update breaks eduroam and possibly many other > > WPA2-Enterprise wifi

Plans for OCaml 5.2/5.3

2024-11-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Just a heads up for OCaml. We currently have OCaml 5.2.0 in Fedora 41 & Rawhide. OCaml 5.3.0 is expected to be released at the "end of November or beginning of December"[1], so it would make sense to move straight to this version in Rawhide after that happens. [1] https://ocaml.org/changelog/2

Re: pkcs11-provider update breaks eduroam

2024-11-20 Thread Davide Caratti
hi, (adding Vlad to the loop) On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 3:43 PM Davide Caratti wrote: > > hi, > > (Also, I tried reproducing locally on f41 > with NetworkManager-ci and << simwifi_ttls_mschapv2_eap >> test, but > did not see any failure... @Arthur, can you share an example > configuration for ed

Re: pkcs11-provider update breaks eduroam

2024-11-20 Thread Davide Caratti
hi, On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:48 PM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > [...] >> I'm trying a setup right now, to understand what's happening. >> wpa_supplicant does not need pkcs11-provider *at the moment*, because >> it uses engine API for pkcs11 (and that is going to be a problem in >> the future for

Re: pkcs11-provider update breaks eduroam

2024-11-20 Thread Clemens Lang
Hi Michael, > On 20. Nov 2024, at 15:52, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20 2024 at 11:09:05 AM +01:00:00, Clemens Lang > wrote: >> The idea here was to auto-enable pkcs11-provider when it is installed, which >> still makes sense to me. The issue here I think is that many people ende

Re: pkcs11-provider update breaks eduroam

2024-11-20 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Wed, Nov 20 2024 at 11:09:05 AM +01:00:00, Clemens Lang wrote: The idea here was to auto-enable pkcs11-provider when it is installed, which still makes sense to me. The issue here I think is that many people ended up with pkcs11-provider installed because of a recommendation. We should remo

Re: Findings by static analyzers in Fedora 42 Critical Path Packages

2024-11-20 Thread František Šumšal
Just to add some positive news after my previous (and somewhat negative emails) - I rebuilt polkit with GCC analyzer and LTO which yielded four warnings and all of them were real issues (well, the last one was a potential one, but I understand why GCC analyzer reported it). So it seems to work

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-11-19)

2024-11-20 Thread Florian Weimer
* Josh Boyer: >> * TOPIC: Next Week's Chair (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 17:34:58) >> * INFO: 2024-11-26 meeting is CANCELED due to lack of expected >> quorum (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 17:39:34) >> * INFO: F42/F43 Election questions will be reviewed and approved >> async using the FastTrack process (