Hi, > On 19. Nov 2024, at 17:47, Arthur Bols <art...@bols.dev> wrote: > > A few days ago pkcs11-provider-0.5-3.fc41 update was pushed to Fedora 41. > Unfortunately, this update breaks eduroam and possibly many other > WPA2-Enterprise wifi networks. There are multiple threads on Fedora > Discussion, mainly [0], and a bug report [1]. > > I understand that the maintainers implemented this change with the best > intentions, however, could someone clarify why this provider was enabled so > abruptly in this update? Wouldn’t such a change typically require a change > proposal? Given how many users are affected, would it make sense to consider > rolling back the update until there’s a fix?
I think the bug can be fixed in wpa_supplicant, but until that happens, users should just uninstall pkcs11-provider. The idea here was to auto-enable pkcs11-provider when it is installed, which still makes sense to me. The issue here I think is that many people ended up with pkcs11-provider installed because of a recommendation. We should remove that recommendation, most users don’t need pcks11-provider installed. HTH, Clemens -- Clemens Lang RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
