I've had two ceph builds fail — one ppc64le and one x86_64 — apparently
when the disk filled up.
first was https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=125823380
second was https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=125827710
Has something changed recently wrt disk space?
--
Ka
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:30 AM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2024-11-15 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
>At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
>
> The meeting will be about:
>
* Start planning for 2025
> Source: https://calendar.fedorapr
Hi,
Short:
there seems to be an issue with scsi drivers under high load in Fedora
40, but it's not the kernel alone.
Long:
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/fedora-40-vm-losses-disks-scsi-target2-0-0-target-reset-operation-started.157452/
Today, or better 6 hours ago, two Proxmox VMs ( kvm,
Am 11.11.24 um 18:51 schrieb Mattia Verga via devel:
- even not considering that, we are misusing the concept of karma (as
I understand it): giving positive karma to an update doesn't give back
positive karma on your own update, and vice versa.
"Karma" is not given,it's earned by your actions
OLD: Fedora-eln-20241114.n.1
NEW: Fedora-eln-20241115.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 29
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 19.75 MiB
Size of dropped packages:9.76 MiB
Thanks for sharing the report. I looked into the libcap ones and they
all appear to be false positives, but I can see why gcc struggles to
figure it out. I forwarded them to the upstream developer for confirmation.
Thank you,
Carlos R.F.
On 11/14/24 12:47 AM, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 08:20:27AM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> I've had two ceph builds fail — one ppc64le and one x86_64 — apparently
> when the disk filled up.
>
> first was https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=125823380
> second was https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo
On Thu, 2024-11-14 at 16:40 -0600, Michel Lind wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 05:38:06PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:19:38 +0100
> > Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024, 11:03 Dan Horák wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > seems ImageMagick 7.1.1.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 10:23 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 08:47:36AM +0100, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on new
> > findings by static analyzers in Critical Path Packages that have
> > changed
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 10:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> What does it mean when the table lists the package version as 'el8'?
I was trying to reuse some scripts that are used to generate reports
for RHEL and they did not work as expected. I have fixed it now.
Please take a look at the report again
Am 12.11.24 um 10:07 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé:
For example, right next to the word "karma" at the bottom of the
comment form, we have to put descriptive text telling users what
we actually want from them:
"Karma: Is the update generally functional?"
The word "karma" is adding no value her
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 12:41 AM Ryan Bach via devel
wrote:
>
> https://release-monitoring.org/project/1887/
> 11.7.1
11.5, 11.6, and 11.7 are rolling/development
releases.
11.4(.4) is an LTS release, and would likely
be the next alternative version target for some
future package.
I would expec
Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Am 12.11.24 um 10:07 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé:
> > For example, right next to the word "karma" at the bottom of the
> > comment form, we have to put descriptive text telling users what
> > we actually want from them:
> >
> > "Karma: Is the update generally functional?"
In one week, 2024-11-21, or slightly later, I plan to update libfplll to
version 5.5.0[1] in Rawhide. This is an ABI-incompatible update that
bumps the SONAME version from 8 to 9.
The following packages depend directly on libfplll and will need to be
rebuilt in a side tag. I will rebuild them
What is using the older version of this?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mariadb10.11
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mariadb
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproje
https://release-monitoring.org/project/1887/
11.7.1
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-
On Mon, 2024-11-11 at 17:38 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:19:38 +0100
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024, 11:03 Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > seems ImageMagick 7.1.1.40 comes with an ABI change
> > >
> > > it drops libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10
On Thu, 2024-11-14 at 00:04 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-11-13 at 18:14 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 4:43 AM Sérgio Basto
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2024-11-12 at 07:35 +0100, Remi Collet wrote:
> > > > Le 11/11/2024 à 11:02, Dan Horák a écrit :
> > >
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 05:38:06PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:19:38 +0100
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024, 11:03 Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > seems ImageMagick 7.1.1.40 comes with an ABI change
> > >
> > > it drops libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.
On Thu, 2024-11-14 at 14:07 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-11-14 at 00:04 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Wed, 2024-11-13 at 18:14 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 4:43 AM Sérgio Basto
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2024-11-12 at 07:35 +0100, Remi
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 08:47:36AM +0100, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on new
> findings by static analyzers in Critical Path Packages that have
> changed in Fedora 42.
>
> TLDR: This report[1] contains 37330 findings. Please
Added: https://release-monitoring.org/project/4941/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 03:37:49PM +, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 02:20:32PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 04:23:16AM -0600, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > Can we please look into getting pesign rebuilt? Ideally in f41, but
> > > at the very least in
What does it mean when the table lists the package version as 'el8'?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora C
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 01:51:07PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 03:37:49PM +, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 02:20:32PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > I bumped the release and did a rawhide build:
> > >
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taski
OLD: Fedora-eln-20241113.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20241114.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 19
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:3.37 MiB
Size of
Hello,
I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on new
findings by static analyzers in Critical Path Packages that have
changed in Fedora 42.
TLDR: This report[1] contains 37330 findings. Please review the report
and provide feedback.
A mass scan was performed this week on th
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2024-11-15 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10881/
--
___
devel m
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 02:20:32PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 04:23:16AM -0600, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > Can we please look into getting pesign rebuilt? Ideally in f41, but
> > at the very least in f42.
>
> I bumped the release and did a rawhide build:
> https://koji.fed
Hi,
Regarding Zuul, your are right the cleanup is not configured and canceled
jobs (eg. due to a PR being rebased/updated/closed) don't trigger a cancel
scratch build on Koji.
However Zuul provides a hook for this [1], then that would be a matter of
adding the proper playbook to run in the job def
In one week, 2024-11-21, or slightly later, I plan to update usd to
version 24.11[1] in Rawhide. As usual, this is an ABI-incompatible
update. The sole dependent package is blender; I already verified
compatibility in a local mock build, and I will handle rebuilding it in
the same side tag.
[
Hey, folks. This is just a heads up that we're experiencing increased
levels of openQA test failures due to a few problems:
1. Various tests need to check things out from pagure.io, but lately it
is being flooded by scraper bots and frequently going unresponsive.
This causes tests to fail if they
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20241112.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20241114.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 8
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 218
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 26.95 MiB
Size of dropped packages
and a third auto scratch build two days ago
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=125759322
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 8:20 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> I've had two ceph builds fail — one ppc64le and one x86_64 — apparently
> when the disk filled up.
>
> first was https://koji.fedorap
xavierb merged a pull-request against the project:
`perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Migrate to SPDX license
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple/pull-request/1
--
___
perl
Il 13/11/24 19:32, Mattia Verga via devel ha scritto:
> Il 10/11/24 16:18, Mattia Verga via devel ha scritto:
>> I have started to move away Bodhi from using the term "karma"
> Ok, so... we have concluded that no one consider offensive using "karma"
> for this purpose. Can we step aside from that d
On 11/13/24 19:27, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 11/11/24 16:56, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Deps will be rebuilt in a side tag. This involves an ABI and octave
module api update.
This is starting in f42-build-side-100300
This is now complete -
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3
37 matches
Mail list logo
