Fedora rawhide compose report: 20241109.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20241108.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20241109.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 41 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 584.41 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Fedora eln compose report: 20241110.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-eln-20241109.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20241110.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 6 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: Orphaning python-opentelemetry and related packages

Well, it’s possible that these packages will find a new primary maintainer in Fedora: one of the current co-maintainers, one of the maintainers of the mentioned dependent packages, or some other Fedora packager who has an interest in them. If that doesn’t happen, and the packages end up being

Re: guadeque media player: SPDX license check

Dne 09. 11. 24 v 7:44 odp. Martin Gansser napsal(a): Hi, iI have released a new version of the mediaplayer guayadeque [1] and migrated the license to SPDX. However, I am not sure if this is correct. Can someone with experience have a look at the spec file ? [1]https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpm

Re: Orphaning python-opentelemetry and related packages

Ben, Thank you for your service! Would the workaround be to install from pypi instead? Blaise On Sat, Nov 9, 2024, 1:44 PM Ben Beasley wrote: > I’m orphaning python-opentelemetry and the following related packages: > > - python-opentelemetry-contrib > > - python-opentelemetry-propagat

Re: Orphaning python-opentelemetry and related packages

How interesting, thank you. I have wanted to become a package maintainer for ten years and every few years I get a little closer. Blaise On Sat, Nov 9, 2024, 5:41 PM Ben Beasley wrote: > Well, it’s possible that these packages will find a new primary maintainer > in Fedora: one of the current c

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for lbazan (Luis Enrique Bazan De Leon)

Luis is still around. I poked him on another channel I have with him. On Sat, Nov 9, 2024 at 9:11 AM Mikel Olasagasti wrote: > Hi > > I have opened a non-responsive maintainer check for lbazan (Luis > Enrique Bazan De Leon)[1]. This email is part of that process. > > Luis Enrique has not respon

Non-responsive maintainer check for lbazan (Luis Enrique Bazan De Leon)

Hi I have opened a non-responsive maintainer check for lbazan (Luis Enrique Bazan De Leon)[1]. This email is part of that process. Luis Enrique has not responded to the request of updating transifex-client[2]. The package doesn't work anymore and a new Go based one is required. Kind regards, Mik

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 07. 11. 24 22:41, maxw...@gtmx.me wrote: python-httptools (maintained by: aekoroglu) python-httptools-0.6.0-6.fc41.src requires http-parser-devel = 2.9.4-12.fc41 python3-httptools-0.6.0-6.fc41.x86_64 requires libhttp_parser.so.2()(64bit) If http-par

rawhide and f41 build errors.

Hello, Out of the blue rawhide scratch builds [1] are now failing and f41 builds [2] are failing but f40 builds [3] are succeeding and they are all the same code! Late Oct I made a release so their repo heads are all the same. Does anybody know what has changed in the building process? Or bette

guadeque media player: SPDX license check

Hi, iI have released a new version of the mediaplayer guayadeque [1] and migrated the license to SPDX. However, I am not sure if this is correct. Can someone with experience have a look at the spec file ? [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/guayadeque/blob/rawhide/f/guayadeque.spec Regards M

Orphaning python-opentelemetry and related packages

I’m orphaning python-opentelemetry and the following related packages:     - python-opentelemetry-contrib     - python-opentelemetry-propagator-aws-xray     - python-opentelemetry-resource-detector-azure     - python-opentelemetry-sdk-extension-aws The packages are inherently messy, but are i