Improvements in name resolution, DNS and HTTPS RR and SVCB future usage

2024-10-14 Thread Petr Menšík
Hello! Is there any good place, where do you think possible improvements in resolution API provided to applications should happen? Should it be glibc mailing list? We have touched it at my question about draft allowing multiple records in single DNS query [1]. In current best practice, appli

Re: Tcl/Tk 9.0.0 rebase

2024-10-14 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 06:55:39PM +0200, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable > 9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1] > and several applications will require porting. I will create side-tag > and bug

Fedora CoreOS Numbers 10/2024 edition

2024-10-14 Thread Dusty Mabe
We've now got over 90k weekly Fedora CoreOS nodes. Check out the full post over on the forum: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/fedora-coreos-numbers-10-2024-edition/133781 Dusty -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsub

Re: Tcl/Tk 9.0.0 rebase

2024-10-14 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Jaroslav Škarvada wrote on 2024/10/15 1:55: Hi, I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable 9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1] and several applications will require porting. I will create side-tag and bugs for individual packages. For th

Re: Tcl/Tk 9.0.0 rebase

2024-10-14 Thread Jaroslav Škarvada
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 8:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 14. 10. 24 18:55, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable > > 9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1] > > and several applications will requ

Fedora eln compose report: 20241015.n.0 changes

2024-10-14 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20241014.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20241015.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 28 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:93.34 KiB Size of

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20241014.n.0 changes

2024-10-14 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20241013.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20241014.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:18 Upgraded packages: 62 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.04 MiB Size of dropped packages

PHP 8.4 mass rebuild

2024-10-14 Thread Remi Collet
Hi, See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php84 Mass rebuild started in f42-build-side-98344 Remi -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Condu

Re: PHP 8.4 mass rebuild DONE

2024-10-14 Thread Remi Collet
Le 14/10/2024 à 10:51, Remi Collet a écrit : Hi, See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php84 Mass rebuild started in f42-build-side-98344 See https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-b2df3b058a Package retired php-pecl-gearman (as libgearman was retired) Package FTB

Re: Applications with AppData and not visible in the software center

2024-10-14 Thread Vít Ondruch
Sorry for resurrecting this old thread. But it is again (still?) relevant. I have just noticed that for example GVim is not visible in Gnome Software. The failure listed here [1] is "Vetos    Has no Icon" and I believe this [2] is the fix. The situation is pretty complex to my taste. But in t

Tcl/Tk 9.0.0 rebase

2024-10-14 Thread Jaroslav Škarvada
Hi, I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable 9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1] and several applications will require porting. I will create side-tag and bugs for individual packages. For the preliminary testing there are Tcl/Tk SRPMs a

Re: Tcl/Tk 9.0.0 rebase

2024-10-14 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 14. 10. 24 18:55, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote: Hi, I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable 9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1] and several applications will require porting. I will create side-tag and bugs for individual packages. For

Re: Tcl/Tk 9.0.0 rebase

2024-10-14 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 14. 10. 24 20:14, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 14. 10. 24 18:55, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote: Hi, I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable 9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1] and several applications will require porting. I will create side-