Hi!
I have written and also tried to solve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293749
but I am somehow stuck.
I reinstalled a fresh rawhide (from
Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20240709.n.0.iso)
but I still get the following:
RPM does not know about this directory:
$ rpm -qf
Hi,
can someone take a look at the spec file [1], I think there is something wrong
with the %check section.
[1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/qhotkey.spec
Thanks
Regards
Martin
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 7:15 AM Tom Stellard wrote:
> On 7/5/24 17:05, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on possibly
> new defects identified by static analyzers in Critical Path Packages that
> have changed in Fedora 41. For
Cristian Le wrote:
> On 2024/07/09 17:09, Sandro via devel wrote:
> > On 09-07-2024 17:01, David Bold wrote:
> > Is it possible to have a PR without any code changes?
> > Is there an alternative, recommended way to ask for rebuilds?
> > Specifically in the case of %autorelease, you can bump the rel
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:06:54 +0200, Christoph Karl via devel wrote:
> RPM does not know about this directory:
> $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/qt6
> file /usr/lib/qt6 is not owned by any package
>
> And dnf thinks it is i686-only:
> $ dnf provides /usr/lib/qt6
> Updating and loading repositories:
> Repositor
On 10/07/2024 09:16, Martin Gansser wrote:
can someone take a look at the spec file [1], I think there is something wrong
with the %check section.
HotkeyTest is not a test, but an application. You can enable its build
by passing `-DQHOTKEY_EXAMPLES:BOOL=ON`.
Remove everything from the %chec
I have now completely removed the %check section and
the option "-DQHOTKEY_EXAMPLES:BOOL=ON"
option, a binary is then created for qt5 and qt6.
./release-qt6/redhat-linux-build/HotkeyTest/HotkeyTest
./release-qt5/redhat-linux-build/HotkeyTest/HotkeyTest
Should I include these two binaries in the
Would that be correct?
%install
# Create the directory structure for the test programs
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_libexecdir}/%{name}/qt6
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_libexecdir}/%{name}/qt5
# Copy the test programs to the appropriate directories
cp -a ./release-qt6/redhat-linux-build/HotkeyTest/HotkeyTes
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 10:10 PM David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 13:37 +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 1:16 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 02:05:37AM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I
Hi folks,
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 14:19:51 GMT, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> libtpcmisc ankursinha
I think I've managed to fix this one. Got a PR here now:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libtpcmisc/pull-request/1
Upstream made some tweaks here when they moved to a new re
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 11:02:57AM GMT, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 10:57:42AM GMT, Leo Sandoval wrote:
> > Hi team,
> >
> > We (the Red Hat bootloader team) are completing the work of
> > rebasing/reviewing/testing current rawhide patches, from GRUB2 2.06 to
> > 2.12, so at
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:10:34AM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 10:10 PM David Malcolm wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 13:37 +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 1:16 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Jul 06, 2
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 12:21 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:10:34AM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 10:10 PM David Malcolm
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 13:37 +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 1:16 P
Hi Jerry,
Hau idatzi du Jerry James (loganje...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak (2024
uzt. 10(a), az. (00:39)):
> I need those involved in Go packaging to do something so we can
> unblock the antlr4-project update. I suggest one of the following:
>
> 1. Open review requests for the new packages needed
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 3:14 PM Josh Stone wrote:
>
> Text Log:
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-07-09/fesco.2024-07-09-17.00.log.txt
> HTML Log:
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-07-09/fesco.2024-07-09-17.00.log.html
On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 20:53 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 2:49 PM Wolfgang Ulbrich
> wrote:
> >
> > Btw. Why not splitting anconda RPM in a main part which support
> > only wayland with a new sub package for X11?
> > Than you can reduce package size for workstation and desktop
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 8:16 AM wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 20:53 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 2:49 PM Wolfgang Ulbrich
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Btw. Why not splitting anconda RPM in a main part which support
> > > only wayland with a new sub package for X11?
> > > Than
On 10/07/2024 10:34, Martin Gansser wrote:
Should I include these two binaries in the %files section, and if so, in which
directory should I copy them ?
I doubt these examples need to be installed. Just skip them.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
--
I'm guessing Josh's response was an attempt to use AI to generate a
summary. In the future, please label it as such, so people will read
it with a critical eye. It has some flaws which I will address inline:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 6:56 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 3:14 PM Josh
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 9:38 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> I'm guessing Josh's response was an attempt to use AI to generate a
> summary. In the future, please label it as such, so people will read
> it with a critical eye. It has some flaws which I will address inline:
Yep, because the summary
Ok, round two! https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/142117?lang=en :)
The AI survey is live again, it will require you to re-fill it out
unfortunately as the previous data couldn't be saved, and it would be a bit
useless anyway as the ranking question has now been replaced with what I
hope is a bet
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 2:02 AM Michael Schwendt wrote:
> However, based on that one cannot conclude who may have created /usr/lib/qt6
> on your machine. It may be some other package that stores files in a
> directory _below_ (!) /usr/lib/qt6 and owns files there. It would be a
> packaging mistake
Iteration two is now live!
https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/142117?lang=en
Due to the restrictiveness felt when providing answers on the initial AI/ML
survey, we have reworked this survey to be a bit more straightforward and
open to giving input on the subject of AI/ML.
The aim of this survey
Hi!
Thank you for the clarification.
How about two different packages which do not depend on each other
having both files/directories below /xyz/?
I assume in this case co-ownership of /xyz/ should be used?
Is this rule general valid or are there exceptions?
Icon sizes: https://bugzilla.redhat.
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 41 RC 20240710.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 4:39 AM Mikel Olasagasti wrote:
> I updated the package 3 months ago[1] and it's been updated to a
> version of 2023-10. To avoid the dependencies of *all* the google
> packages[2] and as it's a source only package, the package will be
> built in bootstrap mode to avoid dep
On 7/10/24 7:14 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Then I would encourage FESCo to look at providing better summaries of
> their meetings, because the initial summary leaves the user concluding
> FESCo didn't really discuss anything.
At the very least, I (as chair) probably should have written "!info"
lines
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:36:35AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I'm guessing Josh's response was an attempt to use AI to generate a
> summary. In the future, please label it as such, so people will read
> it with a critical eye. It has some flaws which I will address inline:
If content is lab
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 08:47:32 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> That's exactly it.
>
> $ ls /usr/lib/qt6
> plugins qml
> $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/qt6
> file /usr/lib/qt6 is not owned by any package
> $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/qt6/plugins
> file /usr/lib/qt6/plugins is not owned by any package
> $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/q
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:54:38 +0200, Christoph Karl via devel wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thank you for the clarification.
> How about two different packages which do not depend on each other
> having both files/directories below /xyz/?
> I assume in this case co-ownership of /xyz/ should be used?
>
> Is th
Hi there
mupdf 1.24.x release branch received a series of bugfix releases which
bumped soname. With 1.24.6 it appears to be about time to bring it to
rawhide and F40 (from 1.24.2).
I built mupdf in a side-tag, will rebuild dependencies myself or via
PRs (qpdfview).
Michael
f41-build-side-92323
Hi,
st 10. 7. 2024 v 16:48 odesílatel Jerry James napsal:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 2:02 AM Michael Schwendt
> wrote:
> > However, based on that one cannot conclude who may have created
> /usr/lib/qt6
> > on your machine. It may be some other package that stores files in a
> > directory _below_
32 matches
Mail list logo
