On pátek 1. prosince 2023 15:04:10 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello maintainers!
>
> Let me announce a new release of Mock Core Configs v39.3, aka
> the configuration files for Mock, the chroot build environment manager
> for building RPMs.
>
> The notable change in this release is that we are sw
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231217.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231218.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 51
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.58 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On 18. 12. 23 10:08, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
In any case, if you need to - stay with DNF4 for a while - either do
$ cat ~/.config/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64.cfg
include("/etc/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64.cfg")
config_opts["package_manager"] = "dnf"
... or stay with the `mock-core-conf
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:46:58AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> These are done now, bar waiting for a couple of builds to complete.
... or so we thought.
It turns out that Jerry James identified a code generation bug on s390x:
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/12829
which is fixed ups
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:48:18AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:46:58AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > These are done now, bar waiting for a couple of builds to complete.
>
> ... or so we thought.
>
> It turns out that Jerry James identified a code generatio
On pondělí 18. prosince 2023 11:46:07 CET Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 18. 12. 23 10:08, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > In any case, if you need to - stay with DNF4 for a while - either do
> >
> > $ cat ~/.config/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64.cfg
> > include("/etc/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64.cfg")
> >
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 02:03:27PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Phase 2 goals
> >
> > * Add support for booting UKIs directly.
> > ** Boot path is shim.efi -> UKI, without any boot loader (grub,
> > sd-boot) involved.
>
> This is IMHO a mistake, the systemd-boot and UKI path
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:20:22AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> virtmeorphan 4 weeks ago
I have no special knowledge of this package, but I did read the
article below a few weeks ago about virtme-ng. In particular
virtme-ng uses virtiofs (inst
On 17.12.23 17:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test
builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do
not support podofo-0.10.
I’m orphaning the package python-markdown-include[1]. It is a leaf
package in Fedora and EPEL9, and has been for several releases, although
it is still used by a number of packages in the wider Python ecosystem[2].
The package is up to date, upstream remains active, and the spec file is
clean,
Hi,
On 12/18/23 06:41, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 02:03:27PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
Hi,
Phase 2 goals
* Add support for booting UKIs directly.
** Boot path is shim.efi -> UKI, without any boot loader (grub,
sd-boot) involved.
This is IMHO a mistake, the sys
Hello,
I wanted to ask about the right tactic to make a change in Fedora 40. Libcap-
ng is ready for a new release. I want to remove a Fedora only patch that
allows an errant call to capng_apply to succeed.
Back in Oct 2020, a bug was reported upstream where the user needed to know
that a call
virtme-ng makes testing a new kernel and developing new modules A LOT
easier.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:27 AM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:20:22AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > virtmeorphan 4
> weeks ago
>
> I have
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 18:18, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to ask about the right tactic to make a change in Fedora 40.
> Libcap-
> ng is ready for a new release. I want to remove a Fedora only patch that
> allows an errant call to capng_apply to succeed.
BTW libcap-ng.
Is there any
On Monday, December 18, 2023 1:40:55 PM EST Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 18:18, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I wanted to ask about the right tactic to make a change in Fedora 40.
> > Libcap-
> > ng is ready for a new release. I want to remove a Fedora only patch that
>
On Mon, Dec 18 2023 at 01:17:43 PM -05:00:00, Steve Grubb
wrote:
So, what should I do to remove the patch? Do I push the new release
into
rawhide without the patch or does this need to go through the Fedora
Change
Process? And if so, self-contained or system wide?
Just remove it in rawhide.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:50:11AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:48:18AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:46:58AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > These are done now, bar waiting for a couple of builds to complete.
> >
> > ... or
17 matches
Mail list logo
