Re: PEP-668, cmake FindPython Python_SITEARCH and rpm_prefix

On 25.10.23 02:20, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 5:18 PM Sandro Mani wrote: Hi Since some time, Fedora's cmake FindPython will return Python_SITEARCH=/usr/local/lib64/pythonX.Y/site-packages, which results in possible failure to find python libraries below the system site packag

Bodhi API does not list f39 in pending releases

Hi, Fedora 39 stopped showing in pending releases (and is not in current either) when using: curl https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/releases/?state=pending | jq There is Fedora 39 as flatpak and container, but not with id_prefix==FEDORA. Is this because it is now in final freeze or is it a bodh

Re: Bodhi API does not list f39 in pending releases

This looks like a bug in bodhi. the web UI lists correct releases pending and current. On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:57 AM Pavel Březina wrote: > > Hi, > Fedora 39 stopped showing in pending releases (and is not in current > either) when using: > > curl https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/releases/?sta

Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

Seconding that, the did, at least in the past, and they do interpret the severity of deviations differently than the written standard. On 24.10.23 14:26, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Tue, Oct 24 2023 at 08:06:12 AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: The two tools don't have incompatible ideas of valid m

looking for a maintainer for package remind

Remind (https://dianne.skoll.ca/projects/remind/) is a terminal based reminder utility (with optional Tk GUI frontend). It's kind of a supercharged version of the calendar utility. Remind has been in the fedora packages for many years, but the last update to it has happened in fc24 and after fc29

Re: looking for a maintainer for package remind

Hi Kurt, I'd be happy to help maintain this with you. I've actually been looking for something like Remind for a while now! Best, Neil On Wed, Oct 25, 2023, 07:33 Kurt Keller wrote: > Remind (https://dianne.skoll.ca/projects/remind/) is a terminal based > reminder utility (with optional Tk GU

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20231025.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231024.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231025.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:7 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 155 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 4.19 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: Bodhi API does not list f39 in pending releases

On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 12:55, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > This looks like a bug in bodhi. > > the web UI lists correct releases pending and current. > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:57 AM Pavel Březina > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > Fedora 39 stopped showing in pending releases (and is not in current > > eithe

Re: Bodhi API does not list f39 in pending releases

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 3:17 PM Clement Verna wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 12:55, Tomas Hrcka wrote: >> >> This looks like a bug in bodhi. >> >> the web UI lists correct releases pending and current. >> >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:57 AM Pavel Březina wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > Fedora 39 st

[Fedora Change draft] Zlib transition to zlib-ng

Hi all, We've been working on the Zlib-ng transition for Fedora and would like to share the draft [1] with the community. You can find all the details within the change proposal. Some packages have failed due to unrelated issues or have tests failing due to comparing the output from zlib. On the

Fedora 39 compose report: 20231025.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-39-20231024.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20231025.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Bodhi API does not list f39 in pending releases

On 10/25/23 15:17, Clement Verna wrote: On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 12:55, Tomas Hrcka > wrote: This looks like a bug in bodhi. the web UI lists correct releases pending and current. On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:57 AM Pavel Březina mailto:pbrez...@redhat.com>> wr

FEDORA-2023-ed0c57b4ba — unspecified update for libtirpc — Fedora Updates System

Hello, This update failed [1] due to a system timeout [2] not a test failure... Is there some way to override or wave the failure. tia, steved. [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ed0c57b4ba [2] https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/2225991# __

Re: FEDORA-2023-ed0c57b4ba — unspecified update for libtirpc — Fedora Updates System

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 5:04 PM Steve Dickson wrote: > > Hello, > > This update failed [1] due to a system timeout [2] > not a test failure... Is there some way to override > or wave the failure. There should be a waive option on the right panel for the update in bodhi, and you can also retest fr

Re: FEDORA-2023-ed0c57b4ba — unspecified update for libtirpc — Fedora Updates System

On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 12:03 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > This update failed [1] due to a system timeout [2] > not a test failure... Is there some way to override > or wave the failure. Failed tests are automatically retried one time. However, for...reasons[0]...this isn't shown immedi

Re: Bodhi API does not list f39 in pending releases

Il 25/10/23 12:54, Tomas Hrcka ha scritto: > This looks like a bug in bodhi. > Actually, it was done that way on purpose. The HTML rendered output shows frozen releases in the same table of pending releases by a hack, but for API purposes I just let the output being pedantic about the requested

Fedora CoreOS Meeting Minutes 2023-10-25

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-10-25/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-10-25-16.30.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-10-25/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-10-25-16.30.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023

Re: [Fedora Change draft] Zlib transition to zlib-ng

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 04:40:13PM +0300, Ali Erdinc Koroglu wrote: > Hi all, > We've been working on the Zlib-ng transition for Fedora and would like to > share the draft [1] with the community. > You can find all the details within the change proposal. Some packages have > failed due to unrelat

F39 candidate composes coming - here's the plan

Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop regarding F39 plans. As you may have noticed, we've slipped once or twice already (depending on whether you count the "early target date") and are in danger of slipping again. The go/no-go meeting is scheduled for tomorrow (2023- 10-26). The outstanding

Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

>There are arguments > about whether it's appstream-builder specific (given that Debian's > archive is bigger, their package format is more complex to "pluck" > from, etc and appstream-generator does fine there), but the point is > that for Fedora with appstream-builder, it's too slow. Note that th

Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 3:23 PM Daniel Alley wrote: > > >There are arguments > > about whether it's appstream-builder specific (given that Debian's > > archive is bigger, their package format is more complex to "pluck" > > from, etc and appstream-generator does fine there), but the point is > > th

Re: [Fedora Change draft] Zlib transition to zlib-ng

"Richard W.M. Jones" writes: > However if we succeed in making zlib-ng be the default with the > compatible zlib API then I'll remove that change. Ideally, it's prefered to use the zlib-ng API Any reasons for switching back? -- Tulio Magno ___ devel

Re: [Fedora Change draft] Zlib transition to zlib-ng

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 04:45:07PM -0300, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: > "Richard W.M. Jones" writes: > > > However if we succeed in making zlib-ng be the default with the > > compatible zlib API then I'll remove that change. > > Ideally, it's prefered to use the zlib-ng API > Any re

Re: F39 candidate composes coming - here's the plan

Hi Adam, are bugs related to Fedora gnome that I posted on the forum ignored?  I and a few others have smaller / older graphics cards. They are new enough to work with the USB type cable. On all my Fedora versions, (38-40),  Wayland gnome, beginning around 5 October, 2023, began locking up. Bugz

Re: Help running centpkg

Thanks to the help and suggestions so far. I've gotten farther based on the suggestion to use toolbox. Using the following I can get further toolbox create -i quay.io/rhel-devel-tools/rhel-developer-toolbox:latest toolbox enter rhel-developer-toolbox-latest git clone https://gitlab.com/redhat/cen

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 39 RC 20231025.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 39 RC 20231025.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl

Re: F39 candidate composes coming - here's the plan

On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 20:46 +, Leslie Satenstein via devel wrote: > Hi Adam, are bugs related to Fedora gnome that I posted on the forum ignored?  > I and a few others have smaller / older graphics cards. They are new enough > to work with the USB type cable. > On all my Fedora versions, (38-

Re: Fedora Linux 39 Final blocker status summary #3

On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 04:55:57PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > 6. distribution - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2242759 - NEW: anyone at > all to come up with a genius fix, otherwise we'll likely have to > document this Happy to oblige ;--] Zbyszek ___

Re: FEDORA-2023-ed0c57b4ba — unspecified update for libtirpc — Fedora Updates System

On 10/25/23 12:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 12:03 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, This update failed [1] due to a system timeout [2] not a test failure... Is there some way to override or wave the failure. Failed tests are automatically retried one time. However, f

[Test-Announce] Fedora 39 Candidate RC-1.1 Available Now!

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 39 Candidate RC-1.1 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the curr

Re: Fedora Linux 39 Final blocker status summary #3

On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 22:02 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 04:55:57PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > 6. distribution - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2242759 - NEW: anyone at > > all to come up with a genius fix, otherwise we'll likely have to > > document this

Re: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora Linux 39 Final blocker status summary #3

On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 20:51 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 7:33 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 22:02 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 04:55:57PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > 6. distribution - https:

[Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 39 Final Go/No-Go meeting tomorrow (Thursday)

The Fedora Linux 39 Final Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for Thursday 26 October at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we will determine the status of the F39 Final for the 31 October target date[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see the wiki[3]. [1] https://calendar.

Re: F39 candidate composes coming - here's the plan

On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 11:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop regarding F39 plans. > > As you may have noticed, we've slipped once or twice already (depending > on whether you count the "early target date") and are in danger of > slipping again. The go/no

Re: Help running centpkg

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:48 PM Michael Dawson wrote: > > Thanks to the help and suggestions so far. I've gotten farther based on the > suggestion to use toolbox. Using the following I can get further > > toolbox create -i quay.io/rhel-devel-tools/rhel-developer-toolbox:latest > toolbox enter rhe

[Test-Announce] Fedora 39 Candidate RC-1.2 Available Now!

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 39 Candidate RC-1.2 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the curr