New projection when we will be finished is 2024-08-06. Pure linear
approximation.
Especially because texlive was such an outlier, then any linear estimate
should state the starting and ending dates that were used for the projection.
Similar to financial statistics, it might be better
to use a
Dear Fedora Community,
We're excited to announce the Fedora 39 Cloud Test Day[0], and we need
your help! Before the official release of Fedora 39, we're seeking
community members to participate in a focused testing event. By
contributing, you'll be helping to ensure the stability and quality of
th
On neděle 20. srpna 2023 11:27:44 CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 14. 08. 23 v 21:30 Michael J Gruber napsal(a):
> > Is this supposed to work now?
> >
> > With mock-5.0-1.fc38.noarch and after scrubbing, the image is pulled but
> > then not used because it is "not marked ready" (rawhide, f39, f38)
Hi,
I'm orphaning the scalacheck package.
Best,
Christiano
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project
Le 03/10/2023 à 07:39, Remi Collet a écrit :
Hi,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php83
Mass rebuild is started in f40-build-side-74920
Mass rebuild is done and update pushed in stable:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-246a5cdcbe
Single FTBFS (already reported, not r
Hello,
Yes - I would like my account to continue being listed in the `*packager*`
group, as I am eager to contribute to Fedora.
Regards,
Adam Piasecki.
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 04:23, jeff stewart wrote:
> Yes still interested in contributing to fedora
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023, 9:06 AM Mattia Ver
Dne 03. 10. 23 v 9:31 John Reiser napsal(a):
Especially because texlive was such an outlier, then any linear estimate
should state the starting and ending dates that were used for the projection.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit#gid=0
S
Please, if you have not received this email directly from me (not through the
mailing list) and you are not listed in the affected username, there's no need
to reply.
Thank you.
Mattia
Il 03/10/23 13:57, Adam Piasecki ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> Yes - I would like my account to continue being li
Hi,
I'm orphaning all my packages (which I effectively did
months ago). It's been fun being a maintainer since 2006.
However, I am not interested in contributing to a project
where the primary sponsor and downstream no longer provides
source code freely and openly. It's simply not consistent
wi
I've picked up git and paperkey.
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 9:25 AM Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm orphaning all my packages (which I effectively did
> months ago). It's been fun being a maintainer since 2006.
>
> However, I am not interested in contributing to a project
> where the primary sp
Am Di., 3. Okt. 2023 um 16:25 Uhr schrieb Todd Zullinger :
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm orphaning all my packages (which I effectively did
> months ago). It's been fun being a maintainer since 2006.
>
> However, I am not interested in contributing to a project
> where the primary sponsor and downstream no long
Hi,
Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Thank you for all the effort you have put into maintaining these
> packages so far, for the benefit of all of Fedora, and consequently
> its downstream!
Thanks!
> Your reasons resonate with me, though I'm not taking the same
> conclusions. Have you arranged "success
Hi Todd Zullinger
Got your message!
Leslie Satenstein
PS.
I share your views. I am a senior, age 82.7 (Born Jan 1941), and while I did a
great deal of QA / Testing,I am very disappointed in the direction that both
the Europeans and Americans are heading.
There is, underway now, a stron
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 10:25 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> a project
> where the primary sponsor and downstream no longer provides
> source code freely and openly
what you are talking about ? all RHEL Source are freely available on
Centos Stream , and RHEL never was free .
--
Sérgio M. B.
_
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 9:32:17 AM CDT Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> I've picked up git and paperkey.
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 9:25 AM Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm orphaning all my packages (which I effectively did
> > months ago). It's been fun being a maintainer since
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 10:25 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> a project
>> where the primary sponsor and downstream no longer provides
>> source code freely and openly
>
> what you are talking about ? all RHEL Source are freely available on
> Centos Stream , and RHEL never was
Am 03.10.23 um 17:33 schrieb Todd Zullinger:
Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 10:25 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
a project
where the primary sponsor and downstream no longer provides
source code freely and openly
what you are talking about ? all RHEL Source are freely available on
Ce
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 11:33 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 10:25 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > > a project
> > > where the primary sponsor and downstream no longer provides
> > > source code freely and openly
> >
> > what you are talking about ? all
On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
wrote:
Additionally *all* of the code is fully available in git form on
gitlab
as part of CentOS Stream.
We all know or should know that this is false. It's easy enough to
disprove with a counterexample:
https://access.redhat.com/errata/R
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:14 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
> wrote:
> > Additionally *all* of the code is fully available in git form on
> > gitlab
> > as part of CentOS Stream.
>
> We all know or should know that this is false. It's easy enoug
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 13:13 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
> wrote:
> > Additionally *all* of the code is fully available in git form on
> > gitlab
> > as part of CentOS Stream.
>
> We all know or should know that this is false. It's easy en
Am 03.10.23 um 20:23 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:14 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
wrote:
Additionally *all* of the code is fully available in git form on
gitlab
as part of CentOS Stream.
We all know or should know th
Am 03.10.23 um 20:46 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 13:13 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
wrote:
Additionally *all* of the code is fully available in git form on
gitlab
as part of CentOS Stream.
We all know or should know that
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231002.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231003.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 89
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.95 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi list,
just a heads up: because we're talking about how to validate appstream metadata: When
validating metadata, one of the "default" warnings you get is:
> In the past, mailto: URL schemas to link to email addresses were also supported for
this URL type. It is recommended to not use them
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 20:55 +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> Am 03.10.23 um 20:46 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 13:13 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
> > > wrote:
> > > > Additionally *all* of the code is fully avail
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 08:50:53PM +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> If a bumped version of a package fixes an issue (stream variant of
> CentOS) e.g 2.2, and a released package (rhel variant) has a
> backported fix for e.g. 2.1, that doesn't mean that the code is also
> in the stream git j
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:30:45AM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> Well, in what shape is our "layered image" build system? Aren't we able
Terrible, and going to be decomissioned after f39 release. ;)
But if you mean base images... those are fine.
> to create a new official image say `fedora-
On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 07:46:58 PM +0100, Sérgio Basto
wrote:
it is here :
https://git.centos.org/rpms/webkit2gtk3/c/2d1b790baa97d14849e56ed21d3f0145268283c2?branch=c9
Well OK yes, but that only worked because my example was from before we
stopped publishing sources to git.centos.org. You
On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 02:23:34 PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
The *exact* set of source code that the package was built for is
included in the Source RPM and all of the individual changes that
comprised it are part of the c9s branch in CentOS Stream (or the
maintainer has been regressing cod
On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 03:32:36 PM -0400, Solomon Peachy via devel
wrote:
However, this has _always_ been the situation for RHEL. Only the
sources for the _latest_ point release (eg RHEL 7.4) were ever made
available to the general public; updates/fixes backported to prior
versions (eg RHEL 7.3)
Hi all,
Today, 2023-10-03, is an important day on the Fedora Linux 39 schedule
[1], with significant cut-offs.
Today we have the Final Freeze [2] which starts at 14:00 UTC. This means
that only packages that fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs
[3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' and in
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 04:36:20PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Thank you for all the effort you have put into maintaining these
> packages so far, for the benefit of all of Fedora, and consequently
> its downstream!
Indeed -- thank you Todd.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
Am 03.10.23 um 21:29 schrieb Simo Sorce:
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 20:55 +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
Am 03.10.23 um 20:46 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 13:13 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
wrote:
Additionally *all* of th
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 23:13 +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> Am 03.10.23 um 21:29 schrieb Simo Sorce:
> > On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 20:55 +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> > > Am 03.10.23 um 20:46 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > > > On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 13:13 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > >
Leon,
I don't think this has ever been about whether a piece of code is
present in version 8 (using your example), but about the free (gratis)
availability of the combination of version 7 with selected backports
from version 8 that has been thoroughly tested by RedHat teams and their
infrastru
Because when they ask “where is the code?”, they are asking a different
question than yours :)
Regards,
Carlos
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:30 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 23:13 +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> > Am 03.10.23 um 21:29 schrieb Simo Sorce:
> > > On Tue, 2023-10-0
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 20:55 +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> Am 03.10.23 um 20:46 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 13:13 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Additionally *all* of the code is fully
OLD: Fedora-39-20231002.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20231003.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 12.22 MiB
Size of dropped packages:317.38 KiB
39 matches
Mail list logo
