On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 17:53:59 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> I just saw this[1] on the packager dashboard:
>
> error: Could not create output directory
> /builddir/build/BUILD/libftdi1-1.5/redhat-linux-build/doc/xml
>
> Full log:
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/5182/101845182/build.l
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 09:50:09 +0200
Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 17:53:59 -0500
> Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > I just saw this[1] on the packager dashboard:
> >
> > error: Could not create output directory
> > /builddir/build/BUILD/libftdi1-1.5/redhat-linux-build/doc/xml
> >
> > Full log:
On Tuesday, 06 June 2023 at 10:55, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 09:50:09 +0200
> Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 17:53:59 -0500
> > Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > > I just saw this[1] on the packager dashboard:
> > >
> > > error: Could not create output directory
> > > /builddi
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 11:00:39 +0200
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Tuesday, 06 June 2023 at 10:55, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 09:50:09 +0200
> > Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 17:53:59 -0500
> > > Richard Shaw wrote:
> > >
> > > > I just saw this[1] on th
On 24. 05. 23 8:06, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
@churchyard:
Miro, is it possible to tell %pyproject_save_files about the locale
directory or should I resort to one of the workarounds mentioned in
the ticket?
%pyproject_save_files currently detects and marks %lang files if they:
- have a .mo
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 4:17 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 11:00:39 +0200
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, 06 June 2023 at 10:55, Dan Horák wrote:
> > > On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 09:50:09 +0200
> > > Dan Horák wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 17:53:59 -0500
>
On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 16:14, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 5 2023 at 01:37:24 PM -0400, Stephen Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> > 1. What is a flatpak and what does it mean to have an application in
> > it? Is it everything bundled in it or does it use layers?
>
> Two layers:
>
> * Runtime
Is the Fedora OCI flatpak approach not about the trust into the chain of
flatpak creation? src -> signed rpm -> flatpak? So, even in an ideal world
where RHEL is immutable and the best workstation experience is based on
flatpaks - RPMs are the building block. This is completly different to the
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230605.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230606.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 176
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 112.84 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 06:15:29 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 4:17 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 11:00:39 +0200
> > Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >
> > > On Tuesday, 06 June 2023 at 10:55, Dan Horák wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 09:50:09 +0200
> >
Seems a bit disappointing. I’ve been searching but cannot find any
info on configuring docker to use Fedora’s repo so I could just ignore
the issue altogether. :)
On 5 Jun 2023, at 16:41, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Il 05/06/23 22:12, Ron Olson ha scritto:
Hey all, I am using docker and pul
> Seems a bit disappointing. I’ve been searching but cannot find any
> info on configuring docker to use Fedora’s repo so I could just ignore
> the issue altogether. :)
You should be able to use a full url:
podman pull registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide
podman pull quay.io/fedora/fedora:r
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 7:50 AM Leon Fauster via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Is the Fedora OCI flatpak approach not about the trust into the chain of
> flatpak creation? src -> signed rpm -> flatpak? So, even in an ideal world
> where RHEL is immutable and the best workstation e
There are no topics to be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
Hence, there will be no such meeting.
I cannot chair the meeting next week, so FESCo members, please speak up if you
can.
= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
Change: Make Tool
Yep, that worked, thanks!
For folks searching similar info later, I ran:
docker pull registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide
On 6 Jun 2023, at 8:34, David Schwörer wrote:
Seems a bit disappointing. I’ve been searching but cannot find any
info on configuring docker to use Fedora’s repo so I
Once https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/14789 merges,
the rawhide image on the DockerHub should be fixed too :-)
Thanks for flagging this up.
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 16:37, Ron Olson wrote:
> Yep, that worked, thanks!
>
> For folks searching similar info later, I ran:
>
> doc
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 10:00 PM Christian Schaller wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 2:36 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
>>
>> Why is a Flatpak a better choice for LibreOffice?
>> --
>> Sincerely,
>> Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
>
> There are a lot of ways to answer this, but from any upstr
On 05. 06. 23 10:39, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
- Mock doesn't "Requires:" DNF anymore, just Suggests
So how does this actually work?
I can dnf install mock, dnf remove dnf-plugins-core python3-dnf in a Rawhide
container and mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --init.
I get:
Traceback (most recent cal
Once upon a time, Clement Verna said:
> Once https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/14789 merges,
> the rawhide image on the DockerHub should be fixed too :-)
So... if it takes a manual process (including opening a PR), does it
really make sense to put Rawhide images on Dockerhub?
I'm forking this proposal off from the other thread, as it got buried
under tons of posts.
Shall we set up a libreoffice-sig to coordinate and ensure that
libreoffice and all dependencies are properly maintained and updated as
RPMs? Are there enough users which, like me, don't like the idea to
I would honestly prefer ownership be transferred to the libreoffice -sig, of
which I am more than happy to be a member.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with Proton Mail se
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 9:01 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel
wrote:
>
> I would honestly prefer ownership be transferred to the libreoffice -sig, of
> which I am more than happy to be a member.
This is not possible, the "main admin" needs to be a person, and
cannot be a group. However, the default assig
On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 18:55:36 +
Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> I'm forking this proposal off from the other thread, as it got buried
> under tons of posts.
>
> Shall we set up a libreoffice-sig to coordinate and ensure that
> libreoffice and all dependencies are properly maintained and upd
Then I can be that person. :)
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, June 6th, 2023 at 2:16 PM, Fabio
I am also interested in keeping the LO packages in Fedora.
Hussein
On 6/6/23 20:55, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
I'm forking this proposal off from the other thread, as it got buried
under tons of posts.
Shall we set up a libreoffice-sig to coordinate and ensure that
libreoffice and all depe
Dne 06. 06. 23 v 18:32 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 05. 06. 23 10:39, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
- Mock doesn't "Requires:" DNF anymore, just Suggests
So how does this actually work?
If you really want to work without DNF then you have to flip the default
#config_opts['use_bootstrap_image'] = False
Il 06/06/23 21:16, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 9:01 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel
> wrote:
>> I would honestly prefer ownership be transferred to the libreoffice -sig, of
>> which I am more than happy to be a member.
> This is not possible, the "main admin" needs to be a perso
On 6/6/23 18:07, Fabio Valentini wrote:
In general, I do like having software available as flatpaks,
especially if it's not available from Fedora repositories.
However, there's also the question of *trust* - do I trust the
software source and / or the people / projects providing them?
Let's take
On 6/7/23 08:00, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
As for admin privileges on the FAS group and ML, I'd like to ask 3-4
people to be set up. @decathorpe, @limb, @sharkcz ? @caolanm and
@sbergmann would you like to continue helping in your great work on LO
packages outside RH assignment?
Yes, you ca
29 matches
Mail list logo
