I would honestly prefer ownership be transferred to the libreoffice -sig, of which I am more than happy to be a member.
-- Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers ------------------------------------------------ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. ------- Original Message ------- On Tuesday, June 6th, 2023 at 1:55 PM, Mattia Verga <mattia.ve...@proton.me> wrote: > I'm forking this proposal off from the other thread, as it got buried > under tons of posts. > > Shall we set up a libreoffice-sig to coordinate and ensure that > libreoffice and all dependencies are properly maintained and updated as > RPMs? Are there enough users which, like me, don't like the idea to only > have LO available as a flatpak from an external service like Flathub and > would like to join forces to maintain it in RPM repos? > > What it is needed to set up a SIG? A wiki page and a mailing list? And > also a FAS group, I suppose? > > BTW I've already seen a couple of hiccups which needs to be solved: the > Bugzilla assignee of libreoffice package on src.fp.o is set to > @sbergmann but I suppose it should now be changed to @limb? And, also, > libreoffice 7.5.3 failed to build on Fedora Rawhide, so we now have LO > 3.5.3 on F38 and LO 3.5.2 on Rawhide. > > Mattia
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
