I would honestly prefer ownership be transferred to the libreoffice -sig, of 
which I am more than happy to be a member.



-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
------------------------------------------------ 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

------- Original Message -------
On Tuesday, June 6th, 2023 at 1:55 PM, Mattia Verga <mattia.ve...@proton.me> 
wrote:


> I'm forking this proposal off from the other thread, as it got buried
> under tons of posts.
> 

> Shall we set up a libreoffice-sig to coordinate and ensure that
> libreoffice and all dependencies are properly maintained and updated as
> RPMs? Are there enough users which, like me, don't like the idea to only
> have LO available as a flatpak from an external service like Flathub and
> would like to join forces to maintain it in RPM repos?
> 

> What it is needed to set up a SIG? A wiki page and a mailing list? And
> also a FAS group, I suppose?
> 

> BTW I've already seen a couple of hiccups which needs to be solved: the
> Bugzilla assignee of libreoffice package on src.fp.o is set to
> @sbergmann but I suppose it should now be changed to @limb? And, also,
> libreoffice 7.5.3 failed to build on Fedora Rawhide, so we now have LO
> 3.5.3 on F38 and LO 3.5.2 on Rawhide.
> 

> Mattia

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to