Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

On Monday, 17 April 2023 at 17:53, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > I want to thank you all for the feedback. > > Everything was already mentioned in the discussion so I am not going > to dig into details again. Just a quick summary for anyone who wants > TL;DR for this thread: > > - I am not going to impl

Recommended way to disable parallel build

What's the best way to disable to disable parallel (make) builds? This? %undefine _smp_build_ncpus It seems it will set RPM_BUILD_NCPUS to the empty string, though. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Recommended way to disable parallel build

Maybe %global numjobs 1 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: ht

Re: Recommended way to disable parallel build

On 4/18/23 12:24, Florian Weimer wrote: What's the best way to disable to disable parallel (make) builds? This? %undefine _smp_build_ncpus It seems it will set RPM_BUILD_NCPUS to the empty string, though. No, don't do that. It depends on where you want to do it. From a spec (typically for a

Re: Recommended way to disable parallel build

On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 01:50:32PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 4/18/23 12:24, Florian Weimer wrote: > >What's the best way to disable to disable parallel (make) builds? > > > >This? > > > >%undefine _smp_build_ncpus > > > >It seems it will set RPM_BUILD_NCPUS to the empty string, though. >

Re: soname bump: libtraceevent and libtracefs

Hi all, Just a heads-up, I've built the following packages for Rawhide in the side tag f39-build-side-65890. And I plan to merge the side tag on Sunday. Feel free to let me know if there are concerns or objections. libtracefs-1.6.4-1 trace-cmd-3.1.6-1 libtracecmd-1.3.1-1 kernelshark-2.2.0-1 By t

Re: Recommended way to disable parallel build

On 18. 04. 23 11:24, Florian Weimer wrote: What's the best way to disable to disable parallel (make) builds? This? %undefine _smp_build_ncpus It seems it will set RPM_BUILD_NCPUS to the empty string, though. Set it to 1. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Prioritized bugs and issues

On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 6:00 AM wrote: > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Prioritized bugs and issues on 2023-04-19 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 > America/Indiana/Indianapolis >At fedora-meetin...@irc.libera.chat > > More information available at: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/e

[Test-Announce] Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230418.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230418.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 - package ffmpeg-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with ffmpeg-free provided by ffmpeg-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64 - ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - conflicting requests Probl

Re: subarchitectures and RISC-V, was Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/15/23 19:56, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 08:38:47AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> >> >> On 4/15/23 00:10, David Abdurachmanov wrote: >> >> >>> >>> We have to support SCBs as-is. We even have 64-core OoO (and even >>> dual-socket 128-core) systems coming that are still RVA20 (what