Unable to install locally built rpms

Hi, [Resending here, because the test list doesn't allow me to post, there] on f38, I am unable to install any locally built package (signed with a local key, I have been using for many years): # rpm -U xpetri-0.4.8-0.fc38.x86_64.rpm error: xpetri-0.4.8-0.fc38.x86_64.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA256

Re: Unable to install locally built rpms

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:39 AM Ralf Corsépius wrote: > Hi, > > [Resending here, because the test list doesn't allow me to post, there] > > on f38, I am unable to install any locally built package (signed with a > local key, I have been using for many years): > > # rpm -U xpetri-0.4.8-0.fc38.x86_

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

V Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 02:47:03AM -, Daniel Alley napsal(a): > I am not sure whether by "all historical updates" you are only referring to > all updates being listed in updateinfo.xml, or all history generally > (including old packages). The latter. > But in the latter case, note that keeping

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230228.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230227.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230228.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 96 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.80 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: qemu on i686

[Only direct dependencies] Packages that BuildRequire qemu*: [n] appliance-tools cloud-utils [n] cockpit-machines [n] containers-common copr-rpmbuild [n] diskimage-builder guestfs-tools [n] imagefactory-plugins kata-containers kiwi [n] kiwi-boxed-plugin [ns]koji libguestfs

Re: Unable to install locally built rpms

On Tue, 2023-02-28 at 10:34 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:39 AM Ralf Corsépius > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > [Resending here, because the test list doesn't allow me to post, > > there] > > > > on f38, I am unable to install any locally built package (signed > > with a > > loc

Re: qemu on i686

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 10:52:06AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > [Only direct dependencies] > Packages that BuildRequire qemu*: > > [n] appliance-tools > cloud-utils > [n] cockpit-machines > [n] containers-common > copr-rpmbuild > [n] diskimage-builder > guestfs-tools > [n] imagef

Re: c++ packaging of contour terminal and libunicode

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:21 PM Felix Wang wrote: > Thanks for your advice. I tried and it can be built with no error, but > when installing built contour package, it shows the following error: > ``` > Error: > Problem: conflicting requests > - nothing provides libContourTerminalDisplay.so()(

Re: Update of catch to Catch2 v3

On 24/02/2023 09:42, Tom Hughes wrote: Did you miss the bit where I said you needed to change your BR to catch2-devel unless upstream has v3 support? What about Fedora ELN? catch2-devel is not available there. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) _

Re: Update of catch to Catch2 v3

On 28/02/2023 11:24, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 24/02/2023 09:42, Tom Hughes wrote: Did you miss the bit where I said you needed to change your BR to catch2-devel unless upstream has v3 support? What about Fedora ELN? catch2-devel is not available there. Nothing to do with me. I don'

Fedora 38 compose report: 20230228.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-38-20230227.n.0 NEW: Fedora-38-20230228.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Unable to install locally built rpms

Am 28.02.23 um 10:34 schrieb Kamil Paral: That's most certainly this problem: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/popular-third-party-rpms-fail-to-install-update-remove-due-to-security-policies-verification/31594

Re: Unable to install locally built rpms

On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 07:18, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > > Am 28.02.23 um 10:34 schrieb Kamil Paral: > > > That's most certainly this problem: > > > https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/popular-third-party-rpms-fail-to-install-update-remove-due-to-security-policies-verification/31594 > < > https://ask.

Re: Unable to install locally built rpms

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:56 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: > this issue definitely should go to the common bugs , IMO. > See the link that I posted ;) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.f

Re: c++ packaging of contour terminal and libunicode

On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:04:27 + Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:21 PM Felix Wang wrote: > > > Thanks for your advice. I tried and it can be built with no error, but > > when installing built contour package, it shows the following error: > > ``` > > Error: > > Pr

Re: Unable to install locally built rpms

On Tue, 2023-02-28 at 13:38 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:56 AM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > this issue definitely should go to the common bugs , IMO.  > > > > > See the link that I posted ;) yeah sorry :) common bugs have moved to https://ask.fedoraproject.org/c/common-i

Minor license changes in python-graph-tool 2.46

In python-graph-tool 2.46, the Python package contains a new module (src/graph_tool/collection/small.py) that contains code derived from the NetworkX library under the BSD-3-Clause license, but with modifications under LGPL-3.0-or-later. I have therefore assigned the SPDX expression LGPL-3.0-or

Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2023-02-28)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '202

Re: c++ packaging of contour terminal and libunicode

Grateful for your suggestion, it helps me, so it can build the RPM package and install it finally. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https:

Re: F39 proposal: Modernize Thread Building Blocks for Fedora 39 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 01:46:24PM +, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 6:42 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB > > > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > > process, proposals are publicly

Re: Update of catch to Catch2 v3

On 28/02/2023 12:28, Tom Hughes wrote: Nothing to do with me. I don't do ELN. Got it. I'm working with upstream on porting spdlog to catch v3: https://github.com/gabime/spdlog/pull/2656 The tests passed on GitHub CI, but not on Fedora Koji. Maybe FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 or GLIB assertions strikes ag

Strange RPM build warning

Hello, I'm getting this warning RPM build warnings: source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing But the %changelog is not missing... Any ideas? tia, steved. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscri

Re: Strange RPM build warning

On 28. 02. 23 17:43, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, I'm getting this warning RPM build warnings:     source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing But the %changelog is not missing... Any ideas? Could you please share the spec file? I've seen this when the %changelog was con

Re: Strange RPM build warning

On 2/28/23 12:12 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 28. 02. 23 17:43, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, I'm getting this warning RPM build warnings: source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing But the %changelog is not missing... Any ideas? Could you please share the spec file?

Re: Strange RPM build warning

On 28. 02. 23 18:33, Steve Dickson wrote: On 2/28/23 12:12 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 28. 02. 23 17:43, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, I'm getting this warning RPM build warnings: source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing But the %changelog is not missing... Any ide

Re: Strange RPM build warning

February is abbreviated as "Fed" in the first changelog entry: * Tue Fed 28 2023 Steve Dickson 1.2.6-4.rc2 - Updated to latest upstream RC release: rpcbind-1_2_7-rc2 On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 12:33:39PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > On 2/28/23 12:12 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 28. 02. 23

Re: Strange RPM build warning

On 2/28/23 12:37 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 28. 02. 23 18:33, Steve Dickson wrote: On 2/28/23 12:12 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 28. 02. 23 17:43, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, I'm getting this warning RPM build warnings: source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing B

Re: Strange RPM build warning

On 2/28/23 12:37 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: February is abbreviated as "Fed" in the first changelog entry: * Tue Fed 28 2023 Steve Dickson 1.2.6-4.rc2 - Updated to latest upstream RC release: rpcbind-1_2_7-rc2 Yup! That was the problem... Thank you for your time!!! steved. On Tue, Feb 28,

Re: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition

On 28. 02. 23 0:40, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 28. 02. 23 v 0:26 Jerry James napsal(a): So I guess the script only checks the first line of the git commit message, right? Right. I thought that checking whole commit message may bring more false positives. On one hand, I think the script shoul

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2023-02-28)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2023-02-28) === Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:00:34 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-02-28/fesco.2023-02-28-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: F39 proposal: Modernize Thread Building Blocks for Fedora 39 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 7:46 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 01:46:24PM +, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 6:42 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB > > > > > > Thi

Re: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:37 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On one hand, I think the script should consider commits like this: > > """ > Modernize packaging > > Remove deprecated macros > Verify license is SPDX > Drop Fedora 28 conditionals > """ > > On the other hand, I consider putting "Verified that

Re: Changes to Bugzilla API key requirements

On 2/24/23 11:55, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote: (I admit I'm surprised that "Free Software for Everything" Red Hat is chosing to base something so fundamental to their business on a highly proprietary tool. I suppose O365 is just a matter of time...) Not O365, but Google Workspace... that

Self Introduction:

Hi All, I work as a Senior Kernel Engineer in Intel. I am responsible to create Intel-cmt-cat package for Intel. I would like to join in Fedora packager group. So that I can create and release the Intel-cmt-cat package after every release. I am the maintainer of Intel-cmt-cat project. http

Re: Changes to Bugzilla API key requirements

On Fri, 2023-02-24 at 11:55 -0500, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 05:55:55AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Ah right, I had forgotten about that issue. I do not think I will ever > > understand the fascination some projects have for JIRA. It is proprietary, >

Re: Self Introduction: Dalton Hubble

Welcome Dalton. I really admire the work on Typhoon. I still just roll my own clusters in my home lab via ansible on top of fedora (minimal) but am thinking about also using Fedora CoreOS. Typhoon would be useful. If you have any ideas or thoughts on the plain Kubernetes rpms in Fedora please re

Re: Self Introduction:

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 10:19 PM Kanagaraj, Raghavan wrote: > > Hi All, > > I work as a Senior Kernel Engineer in Intel. I am responsible to create > Intel-cmt-cat package for Intel. I would like to join in Fedora packager > group. So that I can create and release the Intel-cmt-cat package

Re: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition

On 28. 02. 23 21:40, Jerry James wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:37 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On one hand, I think the script should consider commits like this: """ Modernize packaging Remove deprecated macros Verify license is SPDX Drop Fedora 28 conditionals """ On the other hand, I conside

Re: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition

Hi, Miroslav Suchý writes: > The list of packages needed to be converted is again here: > > > https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt > > List by package maintainers is here > > > https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-wi

Re: Changes to Bugzilla API key requirements

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 4:56 PM Solomon Peachy via devel wrote: > (I admit I'm surprised that "Free Software for Everything" Red Hat is > chosing to base something so fundamental to their business on a highly > proprietary tool. I suppose O365 is just a matter of time...) They probably also u

Re: Feedback wanted for a proposed improvement to RPM's ELF dependency generator

Gordon Messmer kirjoitti 23.2.2023 klo 7.34: In case it helps: I started with the filelist in the "fedora" repo, and a list of all of the deps printed by dnf repoquery that ended with '()(64bit)', which should be a list of all of the ELF dependencies that don't have versioned symbols.  I comp