Updated license information for MLpack

2023-02-13 Thread Benson Muite
When updating to SPDX, added Apache-2.0 license for some of the included files in MLpack. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fed

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-13 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 11. 02. 23 v 18:53 Chris Adams napsal(a): Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler via devel said: Ben Cotton wrote: 1–3. distribution — {Workstation,Everything,Server} boot x86_64 image exceeds maximum size — ASSIGNED Let me guess, this is from the -fno-omit-frame-pointers Change? I have been ask

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 13 February (today)

2023-02-13 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello everyone, Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 13th February at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on Matrix or IRC (Libera.chat). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us over: Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#neuro:fedoraproject.or

perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create license corrected

2023-02-13 Thread Petr Pisar
I corrected a license tag in perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-1.003-27.fc39 from "GPL+ or Artistic" to "Artistic-2.0 AND (GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl)". -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@list

Adding liboqs to Rawhide

2023-02-13 Thread Dmitry Belyavskiy
Dear colleagues, I'm currently working on bringing liboqs [1] to rawhide. According to [2], I've added the following line to the spec file: License: MIT and Apache 2.0 and BSD 3-Clause and CC0-1.0 and Unlicense I doubt about 2 licenses that are enumerated: [3] (BSD-like) and [4]. What am I to d

Re: reclaim orphaned moarvm package

2023-02-13 Thread Felix Wang
But I am not in the Fedora packager group yet. So what I am confused that what should I do next. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://

Re: Planned Outage - s390x builders - 2023-02-10 08:00 UTC -> 22:00 UTC

2023-02-13 Thread Luna Jernberg
ssmoogen Current s390x status: Networking and storage on systems is not acting appropriately. Site admins are trying to figure out what is going on. On 2/12/23, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 09:30:53PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> On Sat, 2023-02-11 at 10:54 +0100, Dan Horák wrote

Re: fedrq - new repoquerying tool

2023-02-13 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
The subpackages command looks interesting, and potentially something I can use in ebranch! Can you use rpmdistro-repoquery's repo definitions? That would allow dropping the embedded repo configs Cheers, Michel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fe

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-13 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Chris Adams wrote: > Can you stop grinding your axe against a decision you don't agree with? > You're just "guessing" with zero evidence. I have also seen zero evidence of the contrary (i.e., that the size change is *not* significant), which should have been a prerequisite for accepting the chan

Re: reclaim orphaned moarvm package

2023-02-13 Thread stan via devel
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 12:07:56 - "Felix Wang" wrote: > But I am not in the Fedora packager group yet. So what I am confused > that what should I do next. I am not a packager, but I think this might clarify what you need to do. Maybe an actual packager can give more detail, if it is needed. h

Re: Planned Outage - s390x builders - 2023-02-10 08:00 UTC -> 22:00 UTC

2023-02-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 03:01:34PM +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote: > ssmoogen > Current s390x status: Networking and storage on systems is not acting > appropriately. Site admins are trying to figure out what is going on. Everything is back up now. Sorry for the extended outage. We will will talking

Re: fedrq - new repoquerying tool

2023-02-13 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Maxwell G via devel wrote: > ``` > $ fedrq whatrequires -X -F source $(fedrq subpkgs SRCNAME) # equivalent > $ fedrq subpkgs SRCNAME | fedrq whatrequires -X -i -F source # equivalent > ``` Since your mail does not document what the -X flag does: Quoting: https://git.sr.ht/~gotmax23/fedrq/tree/e75

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-13 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > We need to be much stricter on size increases! In Fedora 9 (when the xz > compression for live images was introduced, which made it smaller than > Fedora 7 or 8), the x86_64 KDE Spin was 729272320 bytes. I have to correct myself: Fedora 9 was not where xz was introd

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2023-02-11 at 18:38 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Ben Cotton wrote: > > 1–3. distribution — {Workstation,Everything,Server} boot x86_64 image > > exceeds maximum size — ASSIGNED > > Let me guess, this is from the -fno-omit-frame-pointers Change? I have been > asking for data on t

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-13 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 11:28, Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > We need to be much stricter on size increases! In Fedora 9 (when the xz > > compression for live images was introduced, which made it smaller than > > Fedora 7 or 8), th

Re: Adding liboqs to Rawhide

2023-02-13 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 12:44:03PM +0100, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > I'm currently working on bringing liboqs [1] to rawhide. > > According to [2], I've added the following line to the spec file: > > License: MIT and Apache 2.0 and BSD 3-Clause and CC0-1.0 and Unlicense > >

Re: fedrq - new repoquerying tool

2023-02-13 Thread Maxwell G
Hi Michel, Thanks for the feedback! On Mon Feb 13, 2023 at 08:04 CST, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > The subpackages command looks interesting, and potentially something I > can use in ebranch! I like it too :). > Can you use rpmdistro-repoquery's repo definitions? That would allow > dropping

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-13 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Stephen Smoogen wrote: > I did a check on some.. I only downloaded 3 isos so this isn't a complete > set. I think trying to track down 11 to 16 years of creeping bloat now is pretty much a lost cause, but one thing I notice: > The 20 largest packages on 33 is: [snip] > 47955205 qt5-qtwebkit > 60

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-13 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 13:56, Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > I did a check on some.. I only downloaded 3 isos so this isn't a complete > > set. > > > > As for qt5-qtwebkit, I am not sure what dragged this in on F33. We have > been > tryi

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-13 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 1:56 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > I did a check on some.. I only downloaded 3 isos so this isn't a complete > > set. > > I think trying to track down 11 to 16 years of creeping bloat now is pretty > much a lost cause, but one thing I notic

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-13 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Stephen Smoogen wrote: > The following is from the F38 image from last week? > > dnf remove qt5-qtwebengine > Error: > Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected > packages: plasma-desktop QtWebEngine is the native web engine of the KDE desktop and the one that shou

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-13 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Neal Gompa wrote: > FYI, if the GTK-based Anaconda UI goes away, the KDE variants probably > ship a thin QtWebEngine wrapper or use Firefox instead for the > web-based UI. No reason to depend on WebKitGTK for this. Well, the way the Anaconda web UI is currently packaged, it hardcodes a requiremen

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-13 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 15:56, Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > The following is from the F38 image from last week? > > > > dnf remove qt5-qtwebengine > > Error: > > Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected >

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-13 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 4:00 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Neal Gompa wrote: > > FYI, if the GTK-based Anaconda UI goes away, the KDE variants probably > > ship a thin QtWebEngine wrapper or use Firefox instead for the > > web-based UI. No reason to depend on WebKitGTK for this. > > Well, t

RE: TSS maintainer volunteer

2023-02-13 Thread Kenneth Goldman
I have a fedora account. How do I get packager status? How do I work with a packager - is that a person or a program? From: Stephen Smoogen Sent: Friday, February 10, 2023 3:04 PM To: Development discussions related to Fedora Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: TSS maintainer volunteer On Fri,

Re: fedrq - new repoquerying tool

2023-02-13 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
Ah, in that case I think my best course of action is see if I can use fedrq as a library and possibly extend it to be able to override dnf options (like where repos are). Would such PRs be acceptable? Thanks, Michel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@li

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-13 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
On 2/13/23 16:10, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 4:00 PM Kevin Kofler via devel > wrote: >> >> Neal Gompa wrote: >>> FYI, if the GTK-based Anaconda UI goes away, the KDE variants probably >>> ship a thin QtWebEngine wrapper or use Firefox instead for the >>> web-based UI. No reason to

Re: TSS maintainer volunteer

2023-02-13 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 9:16 PM Kenneth Goldman wrote: > I have a fedora account. > > > > How do I get packager status? How do I work with a packager - is that a > person or a program? > A quick google gave me this link: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Packa

Re: fedrq - new repoquerying tool

2023-02-13 Thread Maxwell G
On Mon Feb 13, 2023 at 17:05 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Maxwell G via devel wrote: > > ``` > > $ fedrq whatrequires -X -F source $(fedrq subpkgs SRCNAME) # equivalent > > $ fedrq subpkgs SRCNAME | fedrq whatrequires -X -i -F source # equivalent > > ``` > > Since your mail does not docum

Re: fedrq - new repoquerying tool

2023-02-13 Thread Maxwell G
On Mon Feb 13, 2023 at 15:30 CST, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > Ah, in that case I think my best course of action is see if I can use > fedrq as a library and possibly extend it to be able to override dnf > options (like where repos are). There's no need to do that. fedrq can load any .repo file

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-13 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Neal Gompa wrote: > We're not getting rid of Firefox. At least that is an answer, unlike the complete radio silence on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920298 Still does not explain why Firefox has to be the default though. But the thing is, this inevitably leads to: * unnecessarily

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-13 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > And is kept up to date, unlike QtWebEngine. QtWebEngine is invariably > behind on security patches. I blame Google for not making embedded > Chromium a first-class citizen. Qt backports security fixes to its stable branches, a service Google is not offering by themse

[Test-Announce] Fedora 38 Branched 20230213.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

2023-02-13 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 38 Branched 20230213.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Fedora 38 compose report: 20230213.n.1 changes

2023-02-13 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-38-20230209.n.1 NEW: Fedora-38-20230213.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:52 Upgraded packages: 238 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:1.75 GiB Size of

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-13 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 2:25 AM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Neal Gompa wrote: > > We're not getting rid of Firefox. > > At least that is an answer, unlike the complete radio silence on: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920298 > > Still does not explain why Firefox has to be the