Re: The performance impact of various debug options on Fedora Rawhide debug kernels

2022-08-09 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 03/08/2022 22:47, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sun, 2022-07-24 at 10:28 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: The current Fedora Rawhide kernels are too slow to run libguestfs tests when doing Koji builds. These run in a qemu VM, running the Rawhide kernel, emulated using software virtualization (ie

F37 proposal: Emacs 28 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-08-09 Thread Göran Uddeborg
Hello, My package (emacs-vm) was one of the ones that broke with the upgrade to Emacs 28 in F36. I'm trying to get it to work again. One of the issues is that it shows up a large number of warnings. After some time I've now understood this is because of the new native compilation feature. Since m

Process to remove "abandoned" packages?

2022-08-09 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi, I have removed last use of rubygem-memcache-client package in Fedora minutes ago: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-rack/c/7490abe4066b965d222764acf0ae164788cf1721 and I think that rubygem-memcache-client would deserve to be retired from Fedora, because it is deprecated upstream

Re: Process to remove "abandoned" packages?

2022-08-09 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 09. 08. 22 12:20, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi, I have removed last use of rubygem-memcache-client package in Fedora minutes ago: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-rack/c/7490abe4066b965d222764acf0ae164788cf1721 and I think that rubygem-memcache-client would deserve to be retired from

Re: Process to remove "abandoned" packages?

2022-08-09 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 09. 08. 22 v 12:29 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): On 09. 08. 22 12:20, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi, I have removed last use of rubygem-memcache-client package in Fedora minutes ago: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-rack/c/7490abe4066b965d222764acf0ae164788cf1721 and I think that rubyge

Re: Process to remove "abandoned" packages?

2022-08-09 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 09. 08. 22 13:06, Vít Ondruch wrote: You can't retire package with provenpackager powers. If that was possible, I'd probably do that. Actually, you can. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.

fedora-review of m3u8 fails

2022-08-09 Thread Martin Gansser
Hi, fedora-review of m3u8 fails with the following error message: Building target platforms: x86_64 Building for target x86_64 setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1659916800 Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.g2rRRB + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf m3u8-

Re: fedora-review of m3u8 fails

2022-08-09 Thread Mikel Olasagasti
Hau idatzi du Martin Gansser (martin.gans...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak (2022 abu. 9, ar. (14:37)): > > Hi, > > fedora-review of m3u8 fails with the following error message: > > Building target platforms: x86_64 > Building for target x86_64 > setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1659916800 > Executing(%prep):

Re: fedora-review of m3u8 fails

2022-08-09 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 8/9/22 15:37, Martin Gansser wrote: Hi, fedora-review of m3u8 fails with the following error message: Building target platforms: x86_64 Building for target x86_64 setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1659916800 Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.g2rRRB + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD

Re: fedora-review of m3u8 fails

2022-08-09 Thread Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
In the spec, you have this: > %setup -n %{module_name}-%{version} The error message looks like this: > /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress -x -v/builddir/build/SOURCES/m3u8-3.1.0.tar.gz > rpmuncompress: -v/builddir/build/SOURCES/m3u8-3.1.0.tar.gz: unknown option On first glance, this looks like a bug in t

Okay to %excludearch i686?

2022-08-09 Thread Richard Shaw
I'm working on updating the FreeCAD package which is quite large. It doesn't provide libraries for other packages so is there ANY reason to continue to build it for ANY release of Fedora at this point? Seems like a complete waste of resources. Thanks, RIchard _

Re: PSA: koji armv7hl builders locking up

2022-08-09 Thread Steve Dickson
On 8/7/22 3:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Or just wait... I have been checking them a few times a day and rebooting any that are locked up. How long do we have to wait? [1] has been stuck since Mon, 08 Aug 2022 14:17:44 UTC steved. [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90612742

Re: fedora-review of m3u8 fails

2022-08-09 Thread Martin Gansser
@Artur Thanks, that was the solution ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Gu

python-m3u8: how to get %pytest working

2022-08-09 Thread Martin Gansser
Hi, how do i get %pytest on the python-m3u8 package to work ? I have already made several attempts which fail. %check #%%{pytest} -vv --cov-report term-missing --cov m3u8 tests/ #%%{__python3} -m pytest tests/m3u8server.py [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/test/python-m3u8-3.1.0-1.f

Re: fedora-create-review error message

2022-08-09 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 03:34:56AM +, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote: > On Sun, 2022-08-07 at 20:27 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I'm working on a package review for libphidget22 (rename of > > libphidget), but after typing in my bugzilla credentials I get the > > following: > > > > > 32000:

Re: Process to remove "abandoned" packages?

2022-08-09 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 09/08/22 13:21, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > On 09. 08. 22 13:06, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> You can't retire package with provenpackager powers. If that was possible, >> I'd >> probably do that. > Actually, you can. > Yep, you can, but then the package will be in a "weird" state. I've actually retire

Re: python-m3u8: how to get %pytest working

2022-08-09 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 09. 08. 22 16:45, Martin Gansser wrote: Hi, how do i get %pytest on the python-m3u8 package to work ? I have already made several attempts which fail. %check #%%{pytest} -vv --cov-report term-missing --cov m3u8 tests/ #%%{__python3} -m pytest tests/m3u8server.py Hi Martin, It would certai

Unannounced soname bump: samba-client-libs (breaking sssd and so on), redux

2022-08-09 Thread Adam Williamson
Nearly exactly a year ago, mtasaka pointed this out: "Hello, all: samba is upgraded from samba-4.14.6-1.fc34 to samba-4.15.0-0.0.rc1.fc35, Its subpackage (samba-client-libs) contains libndr.so, which did soname bump: libndr.so.1()(64bit) -> libndr.so.2()(64bit)" Sadly, almost the exact same thin

Request for assistance: zfs-fuse

2022-08-09 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
Good morning! zfs-fuse is FTBFS starting with f36. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047144 I've been banging my head on it for a long time, to no avail. I can get around the SConstruct failure by removing some environment variables, and then I hit a linking issue I can't get past.

Re: [HEADS UP] wxGTK 3.2.0 in Rawhide

2022-08-09 Thread Scott Talbert
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022, Scott Talbert wrote: At long last wxWidgets 3.2.0 has been released and I'm getting it into Rawhide. This comes with an soname bump (but this should be the last one as 3.2.x should now be ABI stable). NOTE: users of wxWidgets 3.0 (wxGTK3 package) are now strongly encoura

Re: Request for assistance: zfs-fuse

2022-08-09 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 09/08/2022 18:51, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: zfs-fuse is FTBFS starting with f36. gcc -o cmd/mount_zfs/mount_zfs.o -c "-O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr

[HEADS UP] wxPython 4.2.0 in Rawhide

2022-08-09 Thread Scott Talbert
Hi, Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves migrating to wxWidgets 3.2.0 at the same time. I'm planning to build the new wxPython in Rawhide after F37 branch (although could put it in F37 later). For those packages that use both wxPython and wxWidgets (I *think* t

Re: Request for assistance: zfs-fuse

2022-08-09 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
--- Original Message --- On Tuesday, August 9th, 2022 at 12:06 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 09/08/2022 18:51, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > > > zfs-fuse is FTBFS starting with f36. > > > gcc -o cmd/mount_zfs/mount_zfs.o -c "-O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects > -fexcep

Re: [HEADS UP] wxPython 4.2.0 in Rawhide

2022-08-09 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: Hi, Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves migrating to wxWidgets 3.2.0 at the same time.  I'm planning to build the new wxPython in Rawhide after F37 branch (although could put it in F37 later). For those packages that use

Re: Request for assistance: zfs-fuse

2022-08-09 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet
On Tue, 2022-08-09 at 18:17 +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > > > > gcc -o cmd/mount_zfs/mount_zfs.o -c "-O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto- > > objects > > -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall > > -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > > -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/li

Re: Request for assistance: zfs-fuse

2022-08-09 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 04:51:03PM +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > Good morning! > > zfs-fuse is FTBFS starting with f36. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047144 > > I've been banging my head on it for a long time, to no avail. I can get > around the SConstruct failure by

Re: [HEADS UP] wxPython 4.2.0 in Rawhide

2022-08-09 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 8/9/22 02:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: Hi, Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves migrating to wxWidgets 3.2.0 at the same time.  I'm planning to build the new wxPython in Rawhide after F37 branch (although could put it

Re: PSA: koji armv7hl builders locking up

2022-08-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 09:14:17AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > On 8/7/22 3:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Or just wait... I have been checking them a few times a day and > > rebooting any that are locked up. > How long do we have to wait? [1] has been stuck since > Mon, 08 Aug 2022 14:17:44

Re: Request for assistance: zfs-fuse

2022-08-09 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
--- Original Message --- On Tuesday, August 9th, 2022 at 1:31 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 04:51:03PM +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > > > Good morning! > > > > zfs-fuse is FTBFS starting with f36. > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?

Re: Request for assistance: zfs-fuse

2022-08-09 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 09/08/2022 20:17, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: + export CCFLAGS=-O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches Export must be quoted. GCC compiler options - must not. Try removing optim='%{optflags}' from your SPEC. It should automatically pick flags from $CCFLAGS.

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Prioritized bugs and issues

2022-08-09 Thread Ben Cotton
A rather important scheduling conflict has arisen, so there will be no prioritized bugs meeting this week. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: Process to remove "abandoned" packages?

2022-08-09 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 09. 08. 22 v 12:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): However, if I really wanted to do this, I'd need to ask Mo, possibly use unresponsive maintainer policy. But that is too much hassle, so I'll probably leave it alone. Seems to me like similar process to what you suggests. The timeout will be lik

Re: [HEADS UP] wxPython 4.2.0 in Rawhide

2022-08-09 Thread Scott Talbert
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 8/9/22 02:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: Hi, Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves migrating to wxWidgets 3.2.0 at the same time.  I'm planning to build the new wxPython in Raw

Re: Process to remove "abandoned" packages?

2022-08-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 5:30 PM Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > Il 09/08/22 13:21, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > > On 09. 08. 22 13:06, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> You can't retire package with provenpackager powers. If that was possible, > >> I'd > >> probably do that. > > Actually, you can. > > > Yep

Re: [HEADS UP] wxPython 4.2.0 in Rawhide

2022-08-09 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 8/9/22 05:06 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 8/9/22 02:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: Hi, Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves migrating to wxWidgets 3.2.0 at the same time.  I'm

Re: [HEADS UP] wxPython 4.2.0 in Rawhide

2022-08-09 Thread Scott Talbert
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 8/9/22 05:06 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 8/9/22 02:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: Hi, Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves migrati

Re: [HEADS UP] wxPython 4.2.0 in Rawhide

2022-08-09 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 8/9/22 06:00 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 8/9/22 05:06 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 8/9/22 02:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: Hi, Upstream wxPython has finally mad

Re: F37 proposal: Emacs 28 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-08-09 Thread Jens-Ulrik Petersen
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 4:56 PM Göran Uddeborg wrote: > That brought up a question: what should Emacs add-on packages do when > it comes to native compilation? Should they build and bundle native > code? If I understand it correctly, that would mean a new patch build > of Emacs itself would also r