On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 4:56 PM Göran Uddeborg <goe...@uddeborg.se> wrote:
> That brought up a question: what should Emacs add-on packages do when > it comes to native compilation? Should they build and bundle native > code? If I understand it correctly, that would mean a new patch build > of Emacs itself would also require a rebuild of all add-on packages. > Or should we let Emacs recompile native files at run time? That would > make the recompilation at Emacs upgrades automatic, but it would on > the other hand put a copy of all used libraries in each user's home > directory. > Good point - I feel it probably makes sense yes. > I checked the packaging guidelines > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Emacs/) but > it didn't mention anything around this as far as I could tell. (It > still talks about xemacs which has been retired from the distribution, > which tells me it hasn't been updated very recently.) If there is consensus on native compilation of elisp packages, then the Emacs guidelines should indeed be updated. I guess then the packages would become arch'ed. I feel the bigger problem is that many of the emacs lisp packages in Fedora are out of date. The general recommendation is to use Emacs' own packaging system(s) to install elisp, though I appreciate some people may prefer to use a distro package. Jens
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
