Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

Hello Mark, I replied in the upstream issue. I also think that this error looks like a problem in Cython. Could you please open an upstream report? Have a nice day. Tomas On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:11 PM Mark E. Fuller wrote: > On 20/06/2022 14:45, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > > > > ## Where to

Re: mupdf 1.20.0 coming to rawhide

... so fi you click on "send" a second time (in hyperkitty) because the 1st time appeared to have no effect (no reaction, no browser indication, just the form sitting there) you can send the message twice. Oh well. Patience ;-) ___ devel mailing list --

Re: F37 proposal: Supplement of Server distributables by a KVM VM disk image (Self-Contained Change proposal)

* Ben Cotton: > The creation of the VM disk image, uses the same kickstart files and > installation groups as the standard full installation, except of > course for the hardware-specific items. The image is optimized for > KVM. > > That way, the VM resembles a default server installation as closel

Re: F37 proposal: Supplement of Server distributables by a KVM VM disk image (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 3:28 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Ben Cotton: > > > The creation of the VM disk image, uses the same kickstart files and > > installation groups as the standard full installation, except of > > course for the hardware-specific items. The image is optimized for > > KVM. >

Re: F37 proposal: Supplement of Server distributables by a KVM VM disk image (Self-Contained Change proposal)

> Am 21.06.2022 um 02:18 schrieb Kevin Fenzi : > > ... > What format image is to be produced? qcow2? or raw.xz? or something > else? The current implementation creates compressed qcow2 file to make use of the dynamic capabilities. The default max disk size is 40 GB, the image size is 595 MB.

Fedora-Cloud-36-20220621.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 6/8 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220620.0): ID: 1303609 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1303609 ID: 1303610 Test: aarch64 Cloud_

Re: F37 proposal: Supplement of Server distributables by a KVM VM disk image (Self-Contained Change proposal)

> Am 21.06.2022 um 09:28 schrieb Florian Weimer : > > > Will the image still attempt to download instance metadata over the > network (via cloud-init or some other mechanism), or is this excluded? No, it will not. Currently, it uses FirstBoot. It’s a bit cumbersome, I know, but that is what w

Fedora-Cloud-35-20220621.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 6/8 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220410.0): ID: 1303625 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1303625 ID: 1303626 Test: aarch64 Cloud_

Orphaned Zuul package

Hi, Just to inform you that I've just orphaned the Zuul package. Feel free to take over it if you'd like. Deploying Zuul via container images seems the best solution for the moment. Upstream project provides container images: https://hub.docker.com/u/zuul A k8s operator is also available: https:

Re: Self Introduction: Kate Hsuan

On 6/21/22 07:42, Kate Hsuan wrote: Hi Folks, My name is Kate Hsuan. I'm a software engineer from Red Hat. Currently, I'm working on integration with fwupd, gnome-shell, and gnome settings. They can be used to show the firmware security details and warnings to the user to reduce the risk of the

Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:27:57AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:15 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 3:48 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > > > The most vi

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

On 20. 06. 22 22:11, Mark E. Fuller wrote: On 20/06/2022 14:45, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > ## Where to get help > > Reply to this thread or find us (thrnciar, mhroncok) on #fedora-python IRC channel (libera.chat)or Matrix (#python:fedoraproject.org ). > > --- >

Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB

V Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:58:02AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:27:57AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > There's currently a 100% foolproof way to parse NEVRs into their > > components, because there are *always* two "-" separators (when > > counting from the en

Re: Making Fedora faster (was Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal))

On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 at 19:31, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > Alma is release 8 and CentOS Stream is release 9. I am not surprised > that there are some benchmarks where they differ. I would, however, be > fairly surprised if benchmarks showed significant differences between > RHEL, Alma, and CentOS

Re: side-tag including other side-tag ?

Not as a self service, but relengs should be able to help I suppose: https://pagure.io/releng/ Vít Dne 20. 06. 22 v 17:02 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): Hi, When I started side-tag for opencv I notice that opencv haven't compiled with python 3.11 (beta something) because python 3.11 rebuild was i

Re: HELP: Brand new patch always fails

On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 07:21 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > This started happening a few days ago and I have no idea what's going > on but all of a sudden the patch I created always fails[1]. > > I even deleted the patch and started over: > > quilt setup emqx-nanomq.spec > cd nanomq-0.8.0 > quilt ne

Re: Heads up: openjpeg2-2.5.0 and gdal-3.5.0 coming to rawhide

On 20.06.22 12:11, Michael J Gruber wrote: Hi I've now merged the side tag. Remarks: ... - python-PyMuPDF test fail due to a corrupted double-linked list assertion. I've disabled the test for now, and will investigate further. - python-fiona test fail due to a segmentation fault. I've disabl

Re: HELP: Brand new patch always fails

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:34 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 07:21 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > This started happening a few days ago and I have no idea what's going on > but all of a sudden the patch I created always fails[1]. > > I even deleted the patch and started over: > > q

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

On 6/20/22 07:45 AM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello. As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.11side tag to Rawhide, despite several builds not succeeding. We always aim for some compromise between having the side tag open for too long and having too many failures. I'm

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Source-git SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Source-git SIG on 2022-06-22 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG Agenda: https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issues?tags=meeting&status=Open

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

On 21. 06. 22 12:51, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 20. 06. 22 22:11, Mark E. Fuller wrote: On 20/06/2022 14:45, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:  >  > ## Where to get help  >  > Reply to this thread or find us (thrnciar, mhroncok) on #fedora-python IRC channel (libera.chat)or Matrix (#python:fedoraproject.org <

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:27:12 -0400 "Steven A. Falco" wrote: > On 6/20/22 07:45 AM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > Hello. > > > > As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.11side > > tag to Rawhide, despite several builds not succeeding. We always aim for > > some compromise

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

On 21. 06. 22 16:27, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 6/20/22 07:45 AM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello. As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.11side tag to Rawhide, despite several builds not succeeding. We always aim for some compromise between having the side tag open for

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

On 6/21/22 10:34 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 21. 06. 22 16:27, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 6/20/22 07:45 AM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello. As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.11side tag to Rawhide, despite several builds not succeeding. We always aim for some compro

Renaming a spec file

Hey all, is it possible to rename a spec file? I tried to submit a build using “swiftlang.spec” where previously it had been “swift-lang.spec”, and Koji complained that it couldn’t find swift-lang.spec when trying to build the SRPM: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=88496417 I

Re: Renaming a spec file

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:25 AM Ron Olson wrote: > > Hey all, is it possible to rename a spec file? I tried to submit a build > using “swiftlang.spec” where previously it had been “swift-lang.spec”, and > Koji complained that it couldn’t find swift-lang.spec when trying to build > the SRPM: >

python-migen (Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11)

Hi, On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 01:45:07PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > [...] > If your package fails because there is a non-dependency problem, you > might have already received a bugzilla from us in the past. If the build > failure is related to changes in Python 3.11, it should contain some > hint

Re: Renaming a spec file

Ah, I was afraid of that, seems like a lot of trouble to remove the “-“, but I understand why the process is necessary. On 21 Jun 2022, at 10:26, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:25 AM Ron Olson wrote: >> >> Hey all, is it possible to rename a spec file? I tried to submit a build

Re: python-migen (Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11)

On 21. 06. 22 17:28, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote: Otherwise, what's the avilable timeframe I have to try and figure it out in time for F37 (assuming upstream doesn't start caring about Python 3.11*before* then)? Assuming this is a leaf package (which it appears to be) and assuming you want it pres

Re: Renaming a spec file

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:51 AM Ron Olson wrote: > > Ah, I was afraid of that, seems like a lot of trouble to remove the “-“, but > I understand why the process is necessary. > You could just add the other name as an alias using "Provides" if you want. Provides: swiftlang = %{version}-%{releas

Re: Renaming a spec file

On 21/06/2022 17:25, Ron Olson wrote: Hey all, is it possible to rename a spec file? No. You must follow the package renaming procedure: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Renaming_Process/ -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___

Re: Making Fedora faster (was Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal))

On 6/21/22 05:10, Stephen Smoogen wrote: I am expecting the words are: I would like to see benchmarks we can agree are useful being done by a 'trusted' third party versus a site (or at least does Apples to Apples comparisons of Alma 9 vs CS9 vs Fedora 34 and Alma8 vs CS8 vs Fedora 29 etc ).

Re: Upcoming F37 deadlines

As a reminder, several Fedora Linux 37 deadlines are approaching: * 2022-06-28 — System-Wide Change proposals and proposals requiring a mass rebuild due * 2022-07-19 — Self-Contained Change proposals due For the full schedule, see https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-37/f-37-key-tasks.html

Re: side-tag including other side-tag ?

On Monday, June 20, 2022 10:02:00 AM CDT Sérgio Basto wrote: > Is is possible include builds of one side-tag into other side-tag ? It is also possible to `koji tag-build [dest side tag] [NEVR(s) from other side tag]`, which might work for your use case. I suppose setting one side tag to inherit

Re: Take the Fedora Annual Contributor Survey 2022

On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 04:18:19PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > It would be nice if it worked without javascript. The Javascript in this case is at least open source: https://github.com/LimeSurvey/LimeSurvey/tree/master/framework/web/js/source -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___

Re: [Container-sig] About Fedora containers

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:21:48AM +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote: > Because we had a lot of troubles with Fedora infra for container > images (I can provide more details, if you want), we have decided to > move our containers to https://quay.io/organization/fedora. I wonder if we should just... make t

Re: Self Introduction: Kate Hsuan

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 01:42:19PM +0800, Kate Hsuan wrote: > Currently, I'm working on integration with fwupd, gnome-shell, and > gnome settings. They can be used to show the firmware security details > and warnings to the user to reduce the risk of the security event. > Before joining Red Hat, I'

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 01:45:07PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > Hello. > > As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.11 side > tag to Rawhide, despite several builds not succeeding. We always aim for > some compromise between having the side tag open for too long and havi

Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 09:47:27PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Official non-scratch builds for non-merged pull requests? Looks very > > dangerous. > > Yeah. I think we should think about scratch and non-scratch builds > separately. For scratch builds, e.g. in a pull request, it's

Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB

On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > Hi, all, > > I'd like to discuss how we can add Build tag in the RPM. > > As one of the key points is to turn it into a common standard for rpm > packages across the ecosystem, the conversation is currently opened > upstream [

Re: Making Fedora faster (was Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal))

On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 01:36:22PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > can probably just treat as a proxy for RHEL performance.) Clear and > RHEL (rebuilds) probably get most of their advantages from building > for an x86_64-v2 microarchitecture, which Fedora discussed and > rejected last year (after di

Re: Making Fedora faster (was Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal))

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 3:11 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 01:36:22PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > can probably just treat as a proxy for RHEL performance.) Clear and > > RHEL (rebuilds) probably get most of their advantages from building > > for an x86_64-v2 microarchit

What to do about this Koschei email?

Hey all- Koschei is sending me an email warning me that Nethack builds started to fail in Rawhide[1], but it seems that it successfully built after that, so why is it still sending the emails? Is there something I have to acknowledge or clear to make the emails stop? Thanks, Ron [1] [htt

Re: What to do about this Koschei email?

On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, Ron Olson wrote: Hey all- Koschei is sending me an email warning me that Nethack builds started to fail in Rawhide[1], but it seems that it successfully built after that, so why is it still sending the emails? Is there something I have to acknowledge or clear to make the e

Re: What to do about this Koschei email?

all notifications aren't processed yet, perhaps you will receive another notification that your package is back to normal  On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 16:52 -0500, Ron Olson wrote: > Hey all- > Koschei is sending me an email warning me that Nethack builds started > to fail in Rawhide[1], but it seems

Re: OpenCV update to 4.6.0 in rawhide with soname bump

On Sat, 2022-06-18 at 00:52 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > The plan is to use a side-tag and rebuild all dependencies > I exepect a few problems because I think is more or less a bug fix > release. > > Nothing is needed from maintainers. > side-tag submitted [1] only player [2] fails to bu

Re: What to do about this Koschei email?

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:58 PM Scott Talbert wrote: > Unfortunately, the Fedora notification system seems to be suffering from > massive delays (e.g, several days) lately. And, as I recall, due to various throttling, gmail recipients (which the OP appears to be) have been reported to be among t

Re: OpenCV update to 4.6.0 in rawhide with soname bump

On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 23:31 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sat, 2022-06-18 at 00:52 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > > The plan is to use a side-tag and rebuild all dependencies > > I exepect a few problems because I think is more or less a bug fix > > release. > > > > Nothing is needed fro

[Test-Announce] Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220621.n.3 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220621.n.3. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Making Fedora faster (was Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal))

On 6/21/22 13:10, Matthew Miller wrote: Phoronix credits this to those distros shipping with P-state Performance by default. Yes, but I doubt that for several reasons: First, it's a claim without evidence.  That setting isn't the only difference between any two systems tested.  Second, the c