On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 01:36:22PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > can probably just treat as a proxy for RHEL performance.) Clear and > RHEL (rebuilds) probably get most of their advantages from building > for an x86_64-v2 microarchitecture, which Fedora discussed and > rejected last year (after discussing and rejecting a proposal to > build for x86_64-v3 two years before that.) If you exclude Clear
Phoronix credits this to those distros shipping with P-state Performance by default. In order to figure out what's really the best there as a default for users (rather than benchmarks), I think we'd need to do some significant testing with real-world workloads for latency, throughput, and power consumption. (It might be something where we'd want a different default for Fedora Workstation than for Server or IoT...) -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
