Hi
I'll be updating to cgnslib-4.3 in rawhide in f37-build-side-52152,
rebuilding the following dependencies:
gmsh
paraview
pcl
petsc
vtk
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 36 Candidate Beta-1.4 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the cu
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
I took mingw-llvm as I already defacto maintained it.
On 22.03.22 09:27, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a
my name is Luigi, I am developing TB5 SBC, a new AI-maker board based on
Qualcomm CPU
I am looking for a partner a/o paid-consultant in charge of integrating Fedora
on the board
This project is open source and is SUPER-cool !! (3\)
contact me on: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigigra
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220321.0):
ID: 1189394 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
V Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 09:37:14AM -, Luigi Grax napsal(a):
> my name is Luigi, I am developing TB5 SBC, a new AI-maker board based on
> Qualcomm CPU
>
So it's one of the Aarch64 processors with proprietary peripherals?
> I am looking for a partner a/o paid-consultant in charge of integrating
On Tuesday, March 22, 2022 2:11:08 AM CET Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-03-21 at 15:56 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > On Saturday, March 19, 2022 7:01:46 AM CET Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2022-02-27 at 17:15 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, 27 February 2022 10:06:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220321.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220322.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 96
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 88.46 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 3/22/22 06:04, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 09:37:14AM -, Luigi Grax napsal(a):
>> my name is Luigi, I am developing TB5 SBC, a new AI-maker board based on
>> Qualcomm CPU
>>
> So it's one of the Aarch64 processors with proprietary peripherals?
>
>> I am looking for a partner
No notifications again. The last notification I have received was today
on 6:38 UTC originally sent 2022-03-21 15:55:21 UTC.
Vít
Dne 19. 03. 22 v 22:50 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:29:37AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 07. 03. 22 v 19:12 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
I watche
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220321.0):
ID: 1189803 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi all,
I've started working on something that we talked about a while ago: A
"Feature spotlight" for new features in Fedora that are not getting
visibility because they're too small for the "Change" process, or
because they are added independently of the release cycle, etc.
I've created a pagure
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 12:35 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> No notifications again. The last notification I have received was today
> on 6:38 UTC originally sent 2022-03-21 15:55:21 UTC.
At this point, I wonder if it wouldn't be more productive to just add
a cron job to restart that service once a da
Actually, just moments ago 11:44 UTC I have received more messages, this
time stamped 2022-03-21 17:35:45 UTC. So while the service is not
completely dead, the delay is getting bigger.
Vít
Dne 22. 03. 22 v 12:34 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
No notifications again. The last notification I have rece
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/229 (x86_64), 10/161 (aarch64)
ID: 1189047 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1189047
ID: 1189092 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tes
Anybody available to review this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2066755
Happy to review a similar package or a Python package in return.
Thanks,
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
On 3/22/22 07:18, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Anybody available to review this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2066755
Happy to review a similar package or a Python package in return.
I'm on the way! 🏃🏻♂️
--
Major Hayden
OpenPGP_0x737051E0C1011FB1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signat
hi
thanks for your answers
There is a YOCTO LE Linux project and Android supported on CPU by Qualcomm
peripherals integrated are USB3-HUB from Microchip and MCU
it is a maker-board with very simple architecture
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fe
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
18 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 95/231 (x86_64), 64/161 (aarch64)
New failures (
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 7:42 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've started working on something that we talked about a while ago: A
> "Feature spotlight" for new features in Fedora that are not getting
> visibility because they're too small for the "Change" process, or
> because they are
V Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 07:30:13AM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a):
> All kernel-mode drivers, to be specific. User-mode drivers are an
> underutilized alternative for systems that have an IOMMU/SMMU. Obviously,
> the drivers still need to be free software for Fedora to package them, but
> use
Stijn Hoop via devel wrote:
> This is because not even the basic functions work correctly using the
> out-of-the-box support -- the whole "printing options" page is blank.
>
> I'm not sure if this is an error on the GNOME side or on the Brother
> side,
… if it is even an error at all.
AirPrint i
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 07:17:16AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> If you mean try having a conversation with the community before
> something goes into effect... that's what this thread is. Depending
> on how you count, at least a year in advance if not 3.
I was going to reply last week, but last wee
As part of fixing the FTBFS, I'm updating libcli. The only consumer is
netsniff-ng, which I'll update with a chain build.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with ProtonMail secu
Hello,
I'm trying to answer this question:
"Under which license are the contributions done to Fedora Project,
unless license is specified - and how make this clear to the
contributors (or whether we make this clear enough)".
The answer is _probably_ FPCA [1].
But I've run into practical questions
OLD: Fedora-36-20220321.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220322.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:72.43 KiB
Size of
On 22. 03. 22 17:23, Michal Schorm wrote:
And this HTTPS workflow leads back to my original question - since FAS
users outside of 'packager' group AFAIK don't need to sign FPCA [1],
but can contribute a code - under which license or agreement it is
contributed ? If it is FPCA - are such contribut
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 12:25 PM Michal Schorm wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to answer this question:
> "Under which license are the contributions done to Fedora Project,
> unless license is specified - and how make this clear to the
> contributors (or whether we make this clear enough)".
> The
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 7:06 PM Richard Fontana wrote:
> I would assert that the "unlicensed
> contribution" scenario contemplated by the FPCA is actually going to
> be fairly rare apart from the special case of spec files, which the
> FPCA was particularly aimed at. In the typical case, a Fedora-
I found quite a big mess today, caused by an attempt to bump perl to
5.34.1 in Fedora 36:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-cea638ebd4
Because some packages depend on the exact perl interpreter version, the
maintainer made a buildroot override for perl:
https://bodhi.fedoraproj
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/229 (x86_64), 8/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220321.n.0):
ID: 1190027 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1190027
ID: 1190092 Test:
I was supposed to chair the FESCo meeting today, but there was no agenda, so it
was canceled.
I'll chair the next meeting.
In the meantime, the following was approved via tickets.
= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
Nonresponsive maintainer: Nicolas Mailhot (nim)
https://pagure.io/fesco/is
Anyone have contact with Georgi Valkov (fas gvalkov)?
He maintains python-evdev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066959
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985644
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Michal Schorm kirjoitti 22.3.2022 klo 18.23:
Hello,
I'm trying to answer this question:
"Under which license are the contributions done to Fedora Project,
unless license is specified - and how make this clear to the
contributors (or whether we make this clear enough)".
The answer is _probably_ F
Fedora-review [1] is very widely used in package review. I do not think
I have ever seen a package review where fedora-review was not used. The
last release is 0.7.6, released on 2020-11-11, i.e. more than a year
ago. Since then, there have been multiple improvements.
Would it be possible to r
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:40 PM Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
>
> Hello, community, I need your wisdom for planning a disruptive change.
>
> Fedora 28 had https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings
> Fedora 33 had https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings2
> I believe
Greetings. I just joined devel, following directions I found on how to become
maintainer of an orphaned package. I'm interested in helping resurrect
'remind', last packaged for F29. I've been using it, ran into a problem,
needed a newer version, and realized the package was old. I've built an
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022, Paul DeStefano wrote:
Greetings. I just joined devel, following directions I found on how to
become maintainer of an orphaned package. I'm interested in helping
resurrect 'remind', last packaged for F29. I've been using it, ran into
a problem, needed a newer version, and
Also, specifically:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming
On 3/22/22 21:30, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022, Paul DeStefano wrote:
Greetings. I just joined devel, following directions I found on how
to become maintainer of an
On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 11:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On the first part: yes, there's a long, slow sunset, but I think
> realistically we're going to see business-side attention drop significantly,
> and we'll have correspondingly worse and worse service. Right now, there are
> basically only
Hi all,
Bug link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058475
I have posted the bug report above and emailed the maintainer directly offering
to co-maintain the
package concerned - rednotebook. No responses at all, though the maintainer is
active.
If Fabian Affolter (m...@fabian-affolt
42 matches
Mail list logo
