Request repo only with EPEL banch

Hi everyone, I have an issue with requesting repo only with epel8 branch. fedpkg request-repo doesn`t support any option related to branch name by default it sends the request for new repo with rawhide branch. I also tried to request branch epel8 for non-existing repo, but it failed as expected. I

Fedora-Cloud-35-20220204.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220203.0): ID: 1119110 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220204.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220203.0): ID: 1119127 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: hdf5 fortran build failure with gcc 12

Dave Love wrote on 2022/02/01 19:20: Orion Poplawski writes: On 1/29/22 19:40, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Looks like "minusone" variable looking like constant value defined in fortran/test/tH5A_1_8.F90 needs PARAMETER attribute. Tried this diff: ``` diff --git a/hdf5.spec b/hdf5.spec index 3b1d27

Re: OpenVPN 2.x with kernel acceleration

On 03/02/2022 05:52, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: On 2/2/22 13:34, David Sommerseth wrote: Hi, An OpenVPN colleague of me, Antonio Quartulli (on Cc), has been working on a kernel acceleration module for OpenVPN for quite some time. We call this OpenVPN Data Channel Offload (DCO). This moves the

Re: koji build fails with "No matching package to install"

Hi Miro, a few users have opened a bugzilla ticket [1] with the request to "Add support for Windows VSTs by building the Wine bridges" unfortunately I don't know how to do this at the moment and need help. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038747 Regards Martin

Re: koji build fails with "No matching package to install"

> Hi Miro, > > > a few users have opened a bugzilla ticket [1] with the request to "Add > support for > Windows VSTs by building the Wine bridges" unfortunately I don't know how to > do > this at the moment and need help. > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038747 > > Regards

Non-responsive maintainer check for nim

There seem to be a common knowledge that nim has quit Fedora around a year ago. This is the mandatory email required by https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/ Nonresponsive bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050622 I am req

Unannounced soname bump: liborcus

It appears that liborcus had an soname bump yesterday from 0.16 to 0.17, and the dependent packages were not rebuilt at the time. This seems to affect only LibreOffice, but makes it non-installable in Rawhide. Can someone rebuild it for the new library version? Thanks, -Ian ___

Re: Installing from updates-testing not working?

On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 7:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 06:38:11PM +, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > > > > I guess it was a mirror caching issue. I tried again just now and it > picked > > up the update just fine. I didn't think the updates-testing repo was > > mirrored

Re: Request repo only with EPEL banch

V Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:02:57AM +0100, Filip Janus napsal(a): > I have an issue with requesting repo only with epel8 branch. fedpkg > request-repo doesn`t > support any option related to branch name by default it sends the request > for new repo with rawhide branch. I also tried to request branch

emacs uninstallable in Rawhide at the moment

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82370784 DEBUG util.py:444: Problem: package emacs-1:27.2-9.fc35.x86_64 requires libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:444:- conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:444:- nothing provides

Re: Mathematical packages: looking for maintainers

On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:03:27PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > ocaml-tplib I think this is the only ocaml one? I can take it. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Win

Re: emacs uninstallable in Rawhide at the moment

On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 12:21 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82370784 > > DEBUG util.py:444: Problem: package emacs-1:27.2-9.fc35.x86_64 requires > libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > DEBUG util.py:444

Re: java17 as system JDK in f36 in troubles

On 2/3/22 17:43, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 11:08 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 03. 02. 22 16:53, Jiri Vanek wrote: Tag in the older gcc into your side tag, do the rebuilds, untag it? I'm in favour of doing this as most strightforward solution. I'm failing to judge all c

Re: emacs uninstallable in Rawhide at the moment

Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2022/02/04 21:21: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82370784 DEBUG util.py:444: Problem: package emacs-1:27.2-9.fc35.x86_64 requires libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:444:- conflicting r

Re: emacs uninstallable in Rawhide at the moment

Note also that gstreamer1, gstreamer1-plugins-base, and gstreamer1-plugins-good are currently orphaned. – Ben On 2/4/22 07:54, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2022/02/04 21:21: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82370784 DEBUG util.py:444:   Problem: package

Re: Request repo only with EPEL banch

Thanks Petr, I expected such an approach, but my ticket was closed twice with: The Bugzilla bug is for "Fedora EPEL" but the requested branch is "rawhide" So I changed BZ from epel to Fedora. And I hope now it will work. -Filip- pá 4. 2. 2022 v 12:50 odesílatel Petr Pisar napsal: > V Fri

Re: F37 Change: MinGW UCRT target (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Hi On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 8:18 PM Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > For the record: > > https://www.msys2.org/docs/environments/#msvcrt-vs-ucrt states: > > MSVCRT […] Works out of the box on every Microsoft Windows versions. > > This is not entirely true. MSVCRT.DL

CPE Weekly Update – Week of January 31st – February 4th

Hi everyone, This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat (https://libera.chat/). If you wish to read this in the form of a blog post, check the

Re: F37 Change: MinGW UCRT target (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 8:21 AM Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > Hi > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 8:18 PM Kevin Kofler via devel > wrote: >> >> For the record: >> >> https://www.msys2.org/docs/environments/#msvcrt-vs-ucrt states: >> > MSVCRT […] Works out of the box on every Microsoft Windows versions.

Re: Request repo only with EPEL banch

V Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 02:16:09PM +0100, Filip Janus napsal(a): > Thanks Petr, > I expected such an approach, but my ticket was closed twice with: > > The Bugzilla bug is for "Fedora EPEL" but the requested branch is "rawhide" > > So I changed BZ from epel to Fedora. And I hope now it will work.

Re: emacs uninstallable in Rawhide at the moment

On Fri, Feb 4 2022 at 09:54:08 PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Well, by the way, another strange issue here is that webkit2gtk3 now has Requires: gstreamer1-plugins-bad-*freeworld* , which is rpmfusion package. Oops, sorry. This was a think-o. I'll fix it. Michael _

Re: Unannounced soname bump: liborcus

On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 11:20 +, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > It appears that liborcus had an soname bump yesterday from 0.16 to > 0.17, and the dependent packages were not rebuilt at the time. This > seems to affect only LibreOffice, but makes it non-installable in > Rawhide. Can someone reb

Re: emacs uninstallable in Rawhide at the moment

On Fri, Feb 4 2022 at 08:13:38 AM -0500, Ben Beasley wrote: Note also that gstreamer1, gstreamer1-plugins-base, and gstreamer1-plugins-good are currently orphaned. Oh no, I'll ask around to see if we can find a new owner ___ devel mailing list -

Re: Request repo only with EPEL banch

I agree with Petr’s response, and I would like to add that most of the motivations for creating an EPEL-only package are in fact covered by one of the review exceptions[1], e.g: * The package is being created so that multiple versions of the same package can coexist in the distribution

Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded

On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 22:02 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On 03. 02. 22 16:36, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > I've just tried to build python-gssapi with notes enabled after > > krb5 was fixed > > and it builds fine. > > > > See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-gssapi/pull-request/4 Nice!

Re: emacs uninstallable in Rawhide at the moment

On Fri, Feb 4 2022 at 07:58:39 AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Oops, sorry. This was a think-o. I'll fix it. So I have a build going now to fix this, but it will take several hours. If anybody with superpowers is reading this and wants to untag the broken build in the meantime, that wou

Re: OpenVPN 2.x with kernel acceleration

Does this modified openvpn support all the same features/options as the stable release version? Thanks, Neal On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 5:04 AM David Sommerseth wrote: > On 03/02/2022 05:52, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 2/2/22 13:34, David Sommerseth wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> An OpenVPN co

Re: OpenVPN 2.x with kernel acceleration

On 04/02/2022 15:09, Neal Becker wrote: Does this modified openvpn support all the same features/options as the stable release version? Almost. I recommend to have a look at the README.dco.md [0] documentation for details, as that lists the limitations quite nicely. [0]

Re: OpenVPN 2.x with kernel acceleration

On 04/02/2022 11:03, David Sommerseth wrote: We plan to release OpenVPN 2.6 later this year, which will be DCO capable.  This will be available in the existing Fedora repositories, as well as Fedora Copr for releases (like EPEL 7 and 8) where we cannot upgrade easily. You should submit your Lin

Re: OpenVPN 2.x with kernel acceleration

On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:04 AM David Sommerseth wrote: > OpenVPN 2.6 and the openvpn-dco Copr builds should also work even if > kmod-ovpn-dco is not available. And we will provide and support the > kmod-ovpn-dco via the openvpn3 Copr repository until we can get it into > the far more common Fedo

Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded

On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 10:36:02AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 16:22 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:26:09AM -0500, Simo Sorce napsal(a): > > > On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 15:15 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:56:20AM -0500, Simo Sorc

Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded

On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:07 AM Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 22:02 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > On 03. 02. 22 16:36, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > > > I've just tried to build python-gssapi with notes enabled after > > > krb5 was fixed > > > and it builds fine. > > > > > > See https

Re: OpenVPN 2.x with kernel acceleration

On 04/02/2022 15:55, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:04 AM David Sommerseth wrote: OpenVPN 2.6 and the openvpn-dco Copr builds should also work even if kmod-ovpn-dco is not available. And we will provide and support the kmod-ovpn-dco via the openvpn3 Copr repository until we c

Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded

> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:07 AM Simo Sorce > Wait what? pkgconf (our pkg-config implementation) builds on even the > weird esoteric architectures like ppc32 and m68k. What are we missing > here? Yeah, and the older implementation in Debian builds and runs fine even on architectures that have m

Re: OpenVPN 2.x with kernel acceleration

On 04/02/2022 15:53, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 04/02/2022 11:03, David Sommerseth wrote: We plan to release OpenVPN 2.6 later this year, which will be DCO capable.  This will be available in the existing Fedora repositories, as well as Fedora Copr for releases (like EPEL 7 and 8) where

Re: OpenVPN 2.x with kernel acceleration

[bouncing this msg, as Antonio is not subscribed to this devel list] Hi, On 04/02/2022 15:35, David Sommerseth wrote: On 04/02/2022 15:09, Neal Becker wrote: Does this modified openvpn support all the same features/options as the stable release version? Almost.  I recommend to have a look a

Re: Possibly non-responsive maintainer: olem

On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 7:02 AM Maxwell G wrote: > > > Jan 22, 2022 10:07:29 AM Fabio Valentini : > > > Hi everybody, > > > > The Rust SIG and I have been waiting for responses from Olivier (FAS: > > olem) for a while. I had noticed that their Rust packages started > > accumulating FTBFS / FTI / re

Anybody seeing weird NaN regressions with gcc-12.0.1-0.5.fc36?

Hello, Python NaN tests started to fail when Python is built with gcc-12.0.1-0.5.fc36: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050736 Does anybody see similar problems in their packages? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___

GNU toolchain update tracking bug

Hi folks, It seems that I somehow lost track of the GNU toolchain proposal, so it only got submitted to FESCo yesterday. But since it's already happened, I went ahead and created the tracking bug for it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050761 If you have any FTBFS caused by this upd

Re: Fedora Prioritized Bugs update

Not much movement from the last time. If you can help move these forward, you are a hero. 1. shim — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955416 — POST Lenovo ThinkPad T490, unable to boot following clean install, stuck at splash screen This bug appears to affect multiple popular hardware

Re: [External] Re: Fedora Prioritized Bugs update

On 2/4/22 11:36, Ben Cotton wrote: > Not much movement from the last time. If you can help move these > forward, you are a hero. > > 1. shim — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955416 — POST > Lenovo ThinkPad T490, unable to boot following clean install, stuck at > splash screen > >

Re: Why was node_exporter.service renamed to prometheus-node-exporter.service?

> On 28 Jan 2022, at 15:33, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm sorry, this is entirely my fault. I provided symlinks for the binaries, > but didn't think of the systemd unit files symlinks. The services files were > added or modified to take into account environment files which w

No response to pull request , should I use proven packager power ?

Should I merge [1] and update the package ? the security bugs are opened since September [2] ... https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rencode/pull-request/1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003753 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003754 -- Sérgio M. B. ___

Re: emacs uninstallable in Rawhide at the moment

On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 08:13 -0500, Ben Beasley wrote: > Note also that gstreamer1, gstreamer1-plugins-base, and > gstreamer1-plugins-good are currently orphaned. For all practical purposes, Wim has been the maintainer of the GStreamer stack, and just pushed updates earlier today. If for whatever

Re: F37 Change: MinGW UCRT target (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 2/4/22 7:20 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: But there is at least one user that may legitimately want to keep a msvcrt 32bit target: mingw-wine-gecko. I saw a reference[1] to a 32-bit UCRT build so it may be possible to switch over, but it may require some work. [1] https://github.com/msys2/

Re: Weirdness with clang and stdatomic.h on Rawhide

On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 20:27, Ron Olson wrote: > > Here’s a question: what if the following was added to stdatomic.h at the end > of the file: > > #else > #include_next > #endif // C++23 > > Since the rest of the file is gated by C++23, this allows C++ programs that > reference this header to ha

Re: emacs uninstallable in Rawhide at the moment

On Fri, Feb 4 2022 at 08:09:15 AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: So I have a build going now to fix this, but it will take several hours. If anybody with superpowers is reading this and wants to untag the broken build in the meantime, that would be a faster fix. Sorry! This build finished. H

NativeJIT/function.h error with GCC12

Hi all. I need help for following error due to the new GCC12: make[2]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/COPASI-Build-251/build' *** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a bug unless you can reproduce it without enabling any plugins. Event

Re: Weirdness with clang and stdatomic.h on Rawhide

Oh, I forgot I could test for Clang too…I tried that fix and it works for me. :) On 4 Feb 2022, at 13:35, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 20:27, Ron Olson wrote: >> >> Here’s a question: what if the following was added to stdatomic.h at the end >> of the file: >> >> #else >> #inc

Re: F37 Change: MinGW UCRT target (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 05:20:31PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Projects releasing for Windows should probably natively build and test their > releases with Msys2, and they can do so for msvcrt targets. This isn't a very useful suggestion. We build using mingw precisely to avoid touching Win

Re: F37 Change: MinGW UCRT target (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Fwiw, given that the primary use case for a cross-toolchain is for > developer needs, I think it is reasonable to have only UCRT target in the > future. > > Projects releasing for Windows should probably natively build and test > their releases with Msys2, and they can d

Re: Weirdness with clang and stdatomic.h on Rawhide

On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 22:26, Ron Olson wrote: > > Oh, I forgot I could test for Clang too…I tried that fix and it works for me. > :) It's on GCC trunk now, at commit https://gcc.gnu.org/r12-7064 It should get into rawhide whenever the next gcc update happens. > > On 4 Feb 2022, at 13:35, Jo

[Test-Announce] 2022-02-07 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2022-02-07 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat Greetings testers! It's Branch week, Rawhide's broken, and there's some other stuff we could discuss, so let's get togeth

[Test-Announce] 2022-02-07 @ 17:00 UTC - Fedora 36 Blocker Review Meeting

# F36 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2022-02-07 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat Hi folks! We have 6 proposed Beta blockers, 4 proposed Final blockers and one proposed Beta freeze exception to review, so let's have the first review meeting of the cycle on Mon

CentOS 9 Stream mirror metalink down?

I have a CentOS 9 Stream VM I'm trying to update and I'm getting a 503 on: https://mirrors.centos.org/metalink?repo=centos-baseos-9-stream&arch=x86_64&protocol=https,http I'm posting here because the site seems to be Fedora hosted? Thanks, Richard ___

Re: CentOS 9 Stream mirror metalink down?

On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:02 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > I have a CentOS 9 Stream VM I'm trying to update and I'm getting a 503 on: > > > https://mirrors.centos.org/metalink?repo=centos-baseos-9-stream&arch=x86_64&protocol=https,http > > I'm posting here because the site seems to be Fedora hosted? >

Re: CentOS 9 Stream mirror metalink down?

On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 21:10 -0500, Fulko Hew wrote: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:02 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > > I have a CentOS 9 Stream VM I'm trying to update and I'm getting a 503 on: > > > > > > https://mirrors.centos.org/metalink?repo=centos-baseos-9-stream&arch=x86_64&protocol=https,http >

Re: CentOS 9 Stream mirror metalink down?

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:10:47PM -0500, Fulko Hew wrote: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:02 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > > I have a CentOS 9 Stream VM I'm trying to update and I'm getting a 503 on: > > > > > > https://mirrors.centos.org/metalink?repo=centos-baseos-9-stream&arch=x86_64&protocol=https,h

Rawhide update stuck in bodhi with weird test failures

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8e3a84510b It's really unclear why this Rawhide update isn't just being tagged into Rawhide. Single builds don't go through this complicated process. But let's assume it's because of the test failures. The output of Jenkins is incomprehensibl

Re: Rawhide update stuck in bodhi with weird test failures

On Sat, 2022-02-05 at 07:31 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8e3a84510b > > It's really unclear why this Rawhide update isn't just being tagged > into Rawhide. Single builds don't go through this complicated > process. Bodhi's UI isn't the cl