On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 22:02 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On 03. 02. 22 16:36, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > I've just tried to build python-gssapi with notes enabled after > > krb5 was fixed > > and it builds fine. > > > > See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-gssapi/pull-request/4
Nice! Especially the auto build deps, which I tried to enable but was failing for me, so I ended up reverting that change. > It looks like it's not the first time that krb5-config causes issues > because it picks up state from the build env: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997021 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204646 > https://krbdev.mit.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=8159 > > We had similar problems long ago with libpcap's own tool, before the > project made available a pkg-config file, which is much simpler and > nicer (and doesn't fall apart when cross-compiling). Is there any > reason to keep using these specialized binaries over pkg-config these > days? Or is it just a matter of doing the work to gradually switch > over? The latter, but it needs to happen in upstream and needs to take in account that pkg-config is not available in all architectures, so it is hard to sell, as it makes he code more complicate to preserve both mechanism. Simo. -- Simo Sorce RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat, Inc _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
