On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 04:33:39PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> But as you guessed, there's no such support for gradle, sbt, bazel, or
> whatever new build system Google has been cooking up recently. Nor is
> there support for Groovy (no longer available in Fedora, as it
> depended on gradle), K
Hi everyone,
Reminder to kindly think about porting your packages to
avoid build failures with OpenSSL 3.0.0.
We will try a rebuild in the next 2 weeks, and report FTBFS bugs.
Thank you,
Regards,
Sahana Prasad
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 9:45 AM Sahana Prasad wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210928.0):
ID: 1005539 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
W dniu 28.09.2021 o 09:32, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 22.09.2021 o 21:07, Julian Sikorski pisze:
Am 22.09.21 um 19:38 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 6:35 PM Julian Sikorski
wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2021 o 23:12, Richard W.M. Jones pisze:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:16:17PM +0
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210928.0):
ID: 100 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 29. 09. 21 9:11, Sahana Prasad wrote:
Hi everyone,
Reminder to kindly think about porting your packages to
avoid build failures with OpenSSL 3.0.0.
We will try a rebuild in the next 2 weeks, and report FTBFS bugs.
I also see that we have openssl1.1 in the default build root, likely to (at
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210928.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210929.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:7
Upgraded packages: 70
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 474.87 KiB
Size of dropped packages
The Workstation compose is still broken
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:55 PM Fedora Rawhide Report <
rawh...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210928.n.0
> NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210929.n.0
>
> = SUMMARY =
> Added images:0
> Dropped images:
On 26. 09. 21 21:20, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Should the @java-maint-sig group be removed from any packages it is
still associated with? Should it be dissolved, and members be removed?
Should the remaining ruins that used to be packages be orphaned?
Retired? Buried? Forgotten?
Since many have mov
A reinstall fixed my problem
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:10 PM Luna Jernberg wrote:
> The Workstation compose is still broken
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:55 PM Fedora Rawhide Report <
> rawh...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210928.n.0
>>
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 2:50 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 09. 21 21:20, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Should the @java-maint-sig group be removed from any packages it is
> > still associated with? Should it be dissolved, and members be removed?
> > Should the remaining ruins that used to be packa
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:49 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 26. 09. 21 21:20, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Should the @java-maint-sig group be removed from any packages it is
> > still associated with? Should it be dissolved, and members be removed?
> > Should the remaining ruins that used to be pack
Hi,
In the latest git release (2.33.0), upstream stopped shipping
git-multimail. We are currently shipping it in Fedora with git-2.32.0,
but not as a standalone package.
The reason for removing git-multimail from contrib/ is that it might
attract more attention as a standalone project and to prev
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud
Failed openQA tes
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:53 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 25. 09. 21 11:12, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > So, if I understand correctly, the problem is that right now there's
> > no *existing* tool that reliably detects if a given "executable" (has
> > mode +x) is an actual executable "script" with
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 01:29:44PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Everything should be more or less complete so let me know if I missed
> anything.
>
> Now on to OpenColorIO 2... Blender is moving to it (and not looking back),
> usd doesn't support it. Yay! More fun! :)
Hi,
the imath update seems
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 6:00 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 29. 09. 21 9:11, Sahana Prasad wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Reminder to kindly think about porting your packages to
> > avoid build failures with OpenSSL 3.0.0.
> > We will try a rebuild in the next 2 weeks, and report FTBFS bugs.
>
> I
On 29/09/21 15:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 01:29:44PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> Everything should be more or less complete so let me know if I missed
>> anything.
>>
>> Now on to OpenColorIO 2... Blender is moving to it (and not looking back),
>> usd doesn't
On 29. 09. 21 14:48, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:53 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 25. 09. 21 11:12, Fabio Valentini wrote:
So, if I understand correctly, the problem is that right now there's
no *existing* tool that reliably detects if a given "executable" (has
mode +x) is an
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 01:37:08PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> On 29/09/21 15:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 01:29:44PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >> Everything should be more or less complete so let me know if I missed
> >> anything.
> >>
> >> Now o
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 3:41 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 29. 09. 21 14:48, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:53 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 25. 09. 21 11:12, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >>> So, if I understand correctly, the problem is that right now there's
> >>> no *ex
> Am 29.09.2021 um 13:49 schrieb Miro Hrončok :
>
> Since many have moved this discussion away from this question, let me please
> bring back the main reason this was posted.
>
> Since the @java-maint-sig group is esentially non-responsive, I suggest we do
> the following:
>
>
> 1) We remove
Dear colleagues,
I recently added OpenSSH 8.7p1 to rawhide.
This version includes implementation of the SFTP protocol as the main
transfer protocol for the scp utility. In upstream, the SCP protocol is
used by default in the scp utility. The upcoming versions 8.9p1+ (version
8.8p1 is mostly a secu
On 29/09/21 15:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 01:37:08PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>> On 29/09/21 15:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 01:29:44PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
Everything should be more or less complete
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:47:08PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> On 29/09/21 15:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 01:37:08PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> >> On 29/09/21 15:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 01:29:
Dne 29. 09. 21 v 14:10 Ondrej Pohorelsky napsal(a):
Hi,
In the latest git release (2.33.0), upstream stopped shipping
git-multimail. We are currently shipping it in Fedora with git-2.32.0,
but not as a standalone package.
The reason for removing git-multimail from contrib/ is that it might
attr
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php81
== Summary ==
Update the PHP stack in Fedora to latest version 8.1.x
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Remi| Remi Collet]] and [[SIGs/PHP|PHP SIG]]
* Email: remi at fedoraproject dot org
== Current status ==
* An testing module is available in my
[https://b
On 29/09/21 18:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:47:08PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>> On 29/09/21 15:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 01:37:08PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
On 29/09/21 15:24, Zbigniew Jędrz
Please keep the thread here updated with your progress. I'll do what I can
after work.
Is there some way this could have been avoided? I had no idea the update
would end up being stuck in testing for so long. That allowed time for some
of the packages to be updated by their respective maintainers
On 28/09/2021 20:58, Sandro Mani wrote:
mingw-python-pyqt5-sip -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2008646
Done.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
Hello,
does anybody know how to contact Domingo Becker (FAS: beckerde)?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005831
There is an open bugzilla for man-pages-es for about 6 months now, with
no response: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930214
Thanks,
Nikola
___
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 05:08:49PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> On 29/09/21 18:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:47:08PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> >> On 29/09/21 15:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 01:37:
This:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Fedora-Java-Rough-Shape
Brought my attention, what can be done to help?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi all,
RStudio has changed the versioning scheme in the last release. The
last one (currently packaged in Fedora) was 1.4.1717. The new one is
(wait for it...) 2021.09.0+351 (reminds me of [1]). So two obvious
questions:
1. The two schemes actually order properly. Should I increment the epoch an
Dne 25. 01. 21 v 21:26 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_Kinoite
***SNIP
== Detailed Description ==
Fedora Kinoite is an immutable desktop operating system featuring the
KDE Plasma desktop. It is based on the same technologies as Fedora
Silverblue (rpm-ostree,
In one week (October 6), or slightly later, I will build grpc 1.41.0 for
Rawhide (F36). Fedora 35 will remain on 1.39.1.
As is traditional for minor releases of grpc, the C++ ABI was broken
(soversion bumped from 1.40 to 1.41). This time, the C (core) ABI was
also broken (soversion bumped from
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:05 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> What bothers me as well is that this appears to have been communicated trough
> internal channels only.
>
The manager of that team told me that future announcements will be
sent to the bugzilla-announce-list[1], which is public. It was an
ov
On 29/09/2021 22:23, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
1. The two schemes actually order properly. Should I increment the epoch anyway?
No. 2021.09.0+351 is higher than 1.4.1717:
$ rpmdev-vercmp 2021.09.0+351 1.4.1717
2021.09.0+351 > 1.4.1717
2. What should I do with that +351? Do we have a policy about the
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 07:54:55PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 05:08:49PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> > On 29/09/21 18:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:47:08PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> > >> On 29
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 4:42 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 29/09/2021 22:23, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > 1. The two schemes actually order properly. Should I increment the epoch
> > anyway?
>
> No. 2021.09.0+351 is higher than 1.4.1717:
>
> $ rpmdev-vercmp 2021.09.0+351 1.4.1717
> 2021.09.0
> Am 29.09.2021 um 13:57 schrieb Fabio Valentini :
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:49 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>
>> On 26. 09. 21 21:20, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>> Should the @java-maint-sig group be removed from any packages it is
>>> still associated with? Should it be dissolved, and members be
Hello,
I haven't done a review in a while, and since I need some new reviews, I
thought I'd see if anyone wanted to swap.
The latest git-lfs requires 2 new dependencies:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2007909 golang-github-git-lfs-pktline - Git
pkt-line Toolkit
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/20079
> Am 29.09.2021 um 22:13 schrieb Karlis K. :
>
> This:
> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Fedora-Java-Rough-Shape
>
> Brought my attention, what can be done to help?
I take it as a question how to contribute to Fedora Java.
In the end, I guess, we will need to find a grou
* Peter Boy [29/09/2021 23:29] :
>
> Any ideas to get it started to fly?
The first step should be to empty the group in FAS and remove its
bugzilla account from component ownership in Bugzilla (I happen
to think that this is not a good idea in general but it's even worse
when the group has no acti
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 6:48 PM Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>
> * Peter Boy [29/09/2021 23:29] :
> >
> > Any ideas to get it started to fly?
>
> The first step should be to empty the group in FAS and remove its
> bugzilla account from component ownership in Bugzilla (I happen
> to think that this is no
On Wed, 29 Sept 2021 at 23:48, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>
> * Peter Boy [29/09/2021 23:29] :
> >
> > Any ideas to get it started to fly?
>
> The first step should be to empty the group in FAS and remove its
> bugzilla account from component ownership in Bugzilla (I happen
> to think that this is not
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 00:23, Mat Booth wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Sept 2021 at 23:48, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> >
> > * Peter Boy [29/09/2021 23:29] :
> > >
> > > Any ideas to get it started to fly?
> >
> > The first step should be to empty the group in FAS and remove its
> > bugzilla account from co
Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm not familiar with packaging stuff like this so could use some
> pointers:
>
> https://github.com/nwjs/nw.js
Ewww! So people like Electron so much that they redid essentially the same
thing (duct-taping together Chromium and Node.js, taking advantage of the
fact that bo
Hello everyone,
A new version of default time of day wallpaper for Fedora 35 is
available for testing and ready for the applications like Software needed
to display the availability of Fedora 35.
Link: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0d3eae84ae
Let know if there are some i
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> I think Kevin's comment is meant more towards the way the language
> packages itself versus the rpm packaging of the language. Going from
> Kevin's comments on languages over the years, a 'good' language should
> not require such sort of rebuilding.
The OCaml language
Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
> Even in the case of SCM repositories committed binaries, allowing
> bundling would help a lot,
Well, we cannot allow just using the bundled binaries! There are various
technical and legal concerns that make this a no go. But:
> add some kind of automation that r
On 9/29/21 18:20, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
I'm not familiar with packaging stuff like this so could use some
pointers:
https://github.com/nwjs/nw.js
Ewww! So people like Electron so much that they redid essentially the same
thing (duct-taping together Chromium and Nod
Ben Cotton kirjoitti 29.9.2021 klo 23.41:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:05 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
What bothers me as well is that this appears to have been communicated trough
internal channels only.
The manager of that team told me that future announcements will be
sent to the bugzilla-announc
On 9/28/21 8:41 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 08:20, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 02:06:58PM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>>> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
OCaml library code can in principle be dynamically linked, eg:
$ rpm
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 08:46:25PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 07:54:55PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 05:08:49PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> > > On 29/09/21 18:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > >
Neal Gompa writes:
>>
>> On that topic, I've just read an interview of Nicolas Lécureuil, the
>> president of the Mageia board, in which he says that Mageia's Java stack
>> is based on Fedora's and that he interacts with Fedora's Java team
>> (leading me to wonder who exactly he is interacting wi
56 matches
Mail list logo
