No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210926.0):
ID: 1003017 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Dne 24. 09. 21 v 13:55 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
I think w are over-engineering a workaround for something that could be part of system-upgrade. See my proposal in
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DQZOCSVPW4R4MZR2QYBQTO6ZTTU3RCKW/
that got 0 repli
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 8:30 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> > 2. What happens if package P (already installed on the user's system)
> > starts recommending package Q (not installed on the user's system)? Will
> Q
> > get auto-installed together with P's update, or not? I believe it's
> > important t
On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 21:20:07 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Good evening everybody,
>
> Not sure why it's me who's writing this message, but somebody needs to do it.
>
> Community maintenance of Java packages in Fedora is, for all intents
> and purposes, dead. Mikolaj keeps a bare minimum of pa
> Am 27.09.2021 um 10:47 schrieb Ankur Sinha :
>
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 21:20:07 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> Should the @java-maint-sig group be removed from any packages it is
>> still associated with? Should it be dissolved, and members be removed?
>> Should the remaining ruins that used
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 27th
September (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Libera.chat). The
meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can
join us over:
IRC:
https://webchat.libera.chat/?channels=#fedora-n
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:57:12AM +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
> > Am 27.09.2021 um 10:47 schrieb Ankur Sinha :
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 21:20:07 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >> Should the @java-maint-sig group be removed from any packages it is
> >> still associated with? Should it be di
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210926.0):
ID: 1003108 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1003108
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 18:16:17 +0200,
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Am 20.09.21 um 13:31 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
0ad ignatenkobrain, orphan, pwalter 1
weeks ago
I would be interested in becoming a (co)maintainer for this, but would
need sponsorship.
I think I h
Dne 24. 09. 21 v 10:50 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
Should it query for removed packages instead of components?
It seem that when python-foo is retired, the script will attempt to remove python-foo instead of python3-foo (and
python3-foo-docs etc.).
This is fixed now. And build with the fix is in
> Am 27.09.2021 um 11:13 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon :
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:57:12AM +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
>>
>
>> What do you want to gain from it? What is the goal to be?
>
> I believe the original email from Fabio answers both of these questions.
I don’t find a plan or a goal.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:19 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 27.09.2021 um 11:13 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon :
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:57:12AM +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
> >>
> >
> >> What do you want to gain from it? What is the goal to be?
> >
> > I believe the original email from Fabio
Hi all,
Yesterday I updated some fcitx5 related packages for f34 and f35, they
are built in side-tags. But a bug in my scripts causes one package
(fcitx5-mozc) did not build. Before I realized this, I have already
pushed the update in bodhi. Then I manually built it in side-tags, and
updated bodhi
OCaml 4.13 has just come out and we'll be rebuilding all the OCaml
packages in Rawhide into a side tag. Jerry James - who maintains some
of these packages - is not going to be available this week. That
means if I starts the builds now, we might need to keep the side tag
open for 2 or 3 weeks, whe
Hi
I'd still need python-gph-import
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000349) to be reviewed as
the last dependency to be able to update mkdocs.
Thanks
Sandro
On 02.09.21 00:51, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four
dependencies
A question about this which is semi-related to your email.
For some C library packages we have Java bindings, eg:
https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/tree/master/java
These have been disabled in Fedora for ~2 years, but when they were
around they had these BuildRequires:
BuildRequires: ja
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:07 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> A question about this which is semi-related to your email.
>
> For some C library packages we have Java bindings, eg:
> https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/tree/master/java
>
> These have been disabled in Fedora for ~2 years, but w
On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 12:07, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> A question about this which is semi-related to your email.
>
> For some C library packages we have Java bindings, eg:
> https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/tree/master/java
>
> These have been disabled in Fedora for ~2 years, but wh
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:48 PM Qiyu Yan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday I updated some fcitx5 related packages for f34 and f35, they
> are built in side-tags. But a bug in my scripts causes one package
> (fcitx5-mozc) did not build. Before I realized this, I have already
> pushed the update in
> I believe the only requirements are javac, javah, javadoc (optional)
> and a JVM to run the tests on. Is it possible to keep this going,
> or would that require a lot of work?
+1 on this. Having just the minimum, core packages
available in the repo would be good, especially since:
a) It would mea
Vít Ondruch kirjoitti 24.9.2021 klo 11.13:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#multiple_packages
Shouldn't it be somehow aligned with this ^^ chapter? Maybe the chapter
should be referenced at least, because it explains how to request the
side tag.
> section "Chained builds". What about those, what are they useful for?
Chained builds are mostly useful when you have a package B which depends on
package A.
Instead of building package A, waiting for a confirmation that the build
completed
and made it to the buildroot, and then manually launchi
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:15:32PM +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 12:07, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > A question about this which is semi-related to your email.
> >
> > For some C library packages we have Java bindings, eg:
> > https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/tree/
> Am 27.09.2021 um 12:30 schrieb Fabio Valentini :
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:19 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am 27.09.2021 um 11:13 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon :
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:57:12AM +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
>>>
What do you want to gain from it? What
On Sun, 26 Sept 2021 at 16:35, Christopher wrote:
>
> I think part of the problem is that Java is too big. There are too
> many libraries to fit into a single community. I think there's
> probably willing volunteers to maintain some libraries and application
> packages, but these are not necessari
On 27. 09. 21 10:22, Kamil Paral wrote:
> 3. Similarly to above (perhaps exactly the same case), what happens when
> package Q (not installed) starts supplementing package P (installed),
will
> it get auto-installed or not?
No, Q will be not installed. With supplements it is
On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 10:36 PM Christopher wrote:
>
> I think part of the problem is that Java is too big. There are too
> many libraries to fit into a single community. I think there's
> probably willing volunteers to maintain some libraries and application
> packages, but these are not necessa
Hello,
I've been trying to add the OPT token from accounts.fedoraproject.org to my
yubikey. I get a QR code and a otpauth://totp/username?secret=xxx URI.
I copypasted the xxx secret (56 characters: digits and uppercase letters) and
tried to add it via YubiKey Manager GUI via Applications/OTP
On 9/26/21 05:07, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 5:10 PM Alexander Ploumistos
> wrote:
>> I built the latest avogadro2 and avogadro2-libs from the srpm in your
>> copr for F34 and I hit some graphical glitches again. On Wayland,
>> Avogadro2 for X11 has a transparent canvas, whereas
On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 08:45, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 27.09.2021 um 12:30 schrieb Fabio Valentini :
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:19 PM Peter Boy wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Am 27.09.2021 um 11:13 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon :
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:57:12AM +0200, Peter
On 27. 09. 21 15:01, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 09. 21 10:22, Kamil Paral wrote:
> 3. Similarly to above (perhaps exactly the same case), what happens when
> package Q (not installed) starts supplementing package P (installed),
will
> it get auto-installed or not?
No, Q wil
On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 09:28, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to add the OPT token from accounts.fedoraproject.org to my
> yubikey. I get a QR code and a otpauth://totp/username?secret=xxx URI.
>
> I copypasted the xxx secret (56 characters: digits and uppercase letters) and
>
Many valid/interesting points being made. Most of them sound, reasonably, like
developer-/maintainer-centric issues.
Question: Is a primary goal of Fedora distro (JAVA sig, etc) to 'service' its
(java app) users?
If so, what's the current understanding of a user-driven ProductRequirements
sp
OLD: Fedora-35-20210925.n.1
NEW: Fedora-35-20210927.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 79
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 709.34 KiB
Size of dropped packages:99.95 KiB
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 03:27:43PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to add the OPT token from accounts.fedoraproject.org to my
> yubikey. I get a QR code and a otpauth://totp/username?secret=xxx URI.
>
> I copypasted the xxx secret (56 characters: digits and uppercase lett
On 9/26/21 3:20 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Good evening everybody,
Not sure why it's me who's writing this message, but somebody needs to do it.
Community maintenance of Java packages in Fedora is, for all intents
and purposes, dead. Mikolaj keeps a bare minimum of packages working
for the mave
On 27. 09. 21 15:50, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 09:28, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to add the OPT token from accounts.fedoraproject.org to my
yubikey. I get a QR code and a otpauth://totp/username?secret=xxx URI.
I copypasted the xxx secret (56 charac
On 27. 09. 21 16:07, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 03:27:43PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to add the OPT token from accounts.fedoraproject.org to my
yubikey. I get a QR code and a otpauth://totp/username?secret=xxx URI.
I copypasted the xxx secret (56
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:24:23AM -0400, Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
> 1. I propose that every package should use a modern Java build system that
> resolve dependencies (Maven, Gradle, Ant+Ivy, etc), If the package doesn't
> have that, a patch should be provided and contributed upstream.
Any
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20210921.0):
ID: 1003647 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1003647
ID: 1003657
For what it's worth...
I use the OpenJDK on Fedora and I'm very happy with it. I do not use or
need eclipse, or as fast as I can tell, any of the other tooling (e.g.
packaged gradle and other things). My main uses are playing games that
depend on Java and are packaged and built outside the F
Having time and energy to attend again today
On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 4:46 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2021-09-27
> # Time: 15:00 UTC
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
>
> Greeti
As a reminder, we've reached the point in the year where jurisdictions
around the world begin or end summer time. Be sure to check your
recurring meetings on Fedocal[1] to make sure you know when you're
meeting. Some meetings are set to a fixed time UTC and others are set
to a particular time zone.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 4:56 PM Martin Jackson wrote:
>
> For what it's worth...
>
> I use the OpenJDK on Fedora and I'm very happy with it. I do not use or
> need eclipse, or as fast as I can tell, any of the other tooling (e.g.
> packaged gradle and other things). My main uses are playing game
So if you only rely in things like OpenJDK (like for running
Minecraft, as I do, too), then you'll be fine.
If you need ant or maven, you should be fine too, since those two (and
their dependencies) will continue to be maintained.
But everything else ... *tumbleweeds*
Just one user's snapshot; O
On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 13:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:15:32PM +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 12:07, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > A question about this which is semi-related to your email.
> > >
> > > For some C library packages we ha
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 11:58:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> OCaml 4.13 has just come out and we'll be rebuilding all the OCaml
> packages in Rawhide into a side tag. Jerry James - who maintains some
> of these packages - is not going to be available this week. That
> means if I starts t
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 04:28:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 27. 09. 21 16:07, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 03:27:43PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've been trying to add the OPT token from accounts.fedoraproject.org to
> > > my
> > > yubikey
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 5:23 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> I'm not sure about this (the internals of Red Hat are quite opaque),
> but as far as I know, are two different, non-overlapping teams
> involved here:
> One that maintains OpenJDK packages (which are fine), and one that
> maintains Java pac
On 27. 09. 21 17:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 04:28:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 09. 21 16:07, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 03:27:43PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to add the OPT token from accounts.fedoraproject.org to my
There is nothing on the agenda, so I'm canceling this week's meeting.
I'll pick this up again next week if we have anything.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 08:40:08AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 11:58:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > OCaml 4.13 has just come out and we'll be rebuilding all the OCaml
> > packages in Rawhide into a side tag. Jerry James - who maintains some
> > of these packages
* Fabio Valentini:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:07 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>> A question about this which is semi-related to your email.
>>
>> For some C library packages we have Java bindings, eg:
>> https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/tree/master/java
>>
>> These have been disabled
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 04:39:03PM +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 13:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536762
> >
> > so it might be more of a saga than just changing a few commands.
> >
> > Rich.
>
> Hi Rich,
>
> TBH it looks like
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/204 (x86_64), 5/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210925.n.1):
ID: 1003317 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1003317
ID: 1003337 Test: x86_6
On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 17:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 04:39:03PM +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 13:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536762
> > >
> > > so it might be more of a saga than just changi
On 27/09/21 12:47, Qiyu Yan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday I updated some fcitx5 related packages for f34 and f35, they
> are built in side-tags. But a bug in my scripts causes one package
> (fcitx5-mozc) did not build. Before I realized this, I have already
> pushed the update in bodhi. Then I man
On 27/09/21 18:41, Mattia Verga wrote:
> On 27/09/21 12:47, Qiyu Yan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Yesterday I updated some fcitx5 related packages for f34 and f35, they
>> are built in side-tags. But a bug in my scripts causes one package
>> (fcitx5-mozc) did not build. Before I realized this, I have al
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210926.0):
ID: 1003808 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1003808
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests comple
On 27/09/21 19:08, Mattia Verga wrote:
> On 27/09/21 18:41, Mattia Verga wrote:
>> On 27/09/21 12:47, Qiyu Yan wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Yesterday I updated some fcitx5 related packages for f34 and f35, they
>>> are built in side-tags. But a bug in my scripts causes one package
>>> (fcitx5-mozc) d
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 8:52 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Sun, 26 Sept 2021 at 16:35, Christopher wrote:
> >
> > I think part of the problem is that Java is too big. There are too
> > many libraries to fit into a single community. I think there's
> > probably willing volunteers to mainta
Hi,
""
I'm not sure what's the best solution, but I guess the number one
reason to have packages within the Fedora distribution is for a matter
of trust, if this is the case I would argue that a curated list of
maven packages served via a Fedora managed repository would be a
better investment.
""
* Christopher:
> My main point here was that treating the community as a single SIG
> makes no more sense than treating all packages whose software is
> written in C as a single "C SIG" community. It's too overwhelming for
> people to be able to know how to step in and help.
I'm not sure this is
Am 27.09.21 um 15:09 schrieb Mario Torre:
However the majority of people just usually download Eclipse (or IntelliJ for
what matters) from the upstream website anyway, further suggesting that
maintaining Eclipse is not really a rewarding nor useful task.
Just my 2 ¢: Since I switched from upst
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> The bug above is a bit worrying though. I don't think anyone ever
> tried to address those issues. I don't know enough to say if they're
> real or nice to haves, but they seem serious.
I have never seen any handwritten JNI code doing any of the things the bug
wants y
Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
> I think the only way the Java ecosystem to survive in Fedora outside of
> OpenJDK and some core components is to allow bundling (Even JavaScript
> bundling is already allowed), but how do to it without compromising
> security?
The problem is that Java projects typ
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210926.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210927.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 189
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required test results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedo
I logged an issue about this for the Package Maintainer Docs [1].
Similarly to all other other issues in that list,
I intend to do something about this at some point,
unless somebody else beats me to it.
[1]: https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/package-maintainer-docs/issue/33
Otto
Miro Hrončok kirjo
69 matches
Mail list logo
