No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210901.0):
ID: 965858 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four
dependencies reviewed:
- python-mkdocs-redirects:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2000347
- python-pyyaml_env_tag:
https://b
On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four dependencies
reviewed:
- python-mkdocs-redirects:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20
On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hmm in the case of python-pyyaml_env_tag
See also
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_library_naming
...The Fedora package’s name SHOULD contain the Canonical project name.
If possible, the project name SHOULD be the
On 02.09.21 11:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four
dependencies reviewed:
- python-mkdocs-redirects:
https://bugzil
On 02. 09. 21 11:31, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.09.21 11:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four
dependencies reviewed:
-
On Di, 2021-08-31 at 23:13 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> However: Do we actually need multilib for anything (other than maybe
> wine)? For example, I am running Steam on my workstation, and some
> Linux-native games, but I still have *zero* .i686 arch packages
> installed on my system. The Steam
On 02. 09. 21 11:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 11:31, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.09.21 11:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd n
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210901.0):
ID: 965874 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 02.09.21 11:43, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 11:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 11:31, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.09.21 11:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
To updat
On 31. 08. 21 18:53, Matthew Miller wrote:
This is an off-shoot thought of the 32-bit ARM conversation. Right now, we
build stuff like libreoffice for i686, but then (mostly) don't ship it.
This seems like a waste of resources and time.
I know it's somewhat complicated (for example, there's actu
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210901.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210902.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 149
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 15.19 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four
dependencies reviewed:
- python-mkdocs-redirects:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2000347
- python-pyyaml_env_tag:
https://
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 4:14 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
>
> However: Do we actually need multilib for anything (other than maybe
> wine)? For example, I am running Steam on my workstation, and some
> Linux-native games, but I still have *zero* .i686 arch packages
> installed on my system. The Stea
On 02/09/2021 14:03, Richard Shaw wrote:
I was not actually aware there was a flatpak, I used the steam package
from RPM Fusion and obviously it does link with Fedora libraries:
Steam uses its own Steam Runtime, based on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS libraries.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easyco
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 8:49 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 02/09/2021 14:03, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I was not actually aware there was a flatpak, I used the steam package
> > from RPM Fusion and obviously it does link with Fedora libraries:
>
> Steam uses its own Steam Runtime, based o
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud
Failed openQA tes
OLD: Fedora-35-20210831.n.1
NEW: Fedora-35-20210902.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:357.54 KiB
Size of
Hey everyone,
Just a quick mail to let folks know that from October 1st, the CPE team
will be working towards supporting the EPEL community. We just posted a
quick comm blog on it [1] and wanted to raise wider awareness on the devel
list. More good things to follow in the coming weeks and I will t
Hi everyone,
It's that time already! The Fedora Linux 35 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting
is scheduled for Thursday 9 September at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
At this time, we will determine the status of the F35 Beta for the 14
September early target date[2]. For more information about the
Go/No-Go
meet
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 11:39 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9923/
The correct link is https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/meeting/10064/
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
Hey!
Will try to attend and download the Beta when its out when i am home from
Prague and London
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:46 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 11:39 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9923/
>
> The correct link is https:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 12/205 (x86_64), 8/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210831.n.1):
ID: 966456 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/966456
ID: 966468 Test: x86_64 Workstatio
I found the origin of this change to be the following commit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/c/b65f9ed036fca30c0684bfc6fe72d72a53e9867a?branch=f21
(which is a revert of a revert to remove the kernel-doc subpackage).
The commit also suggest that the package might be a candidate for a se
7 years later I find this and was surprised after switching from Debian/Ubuntu.
I cannot find the source or any licensing information for current versions
however there are several alternatives.
One which is already in the repos is pdf-stapler which is good for the basics
but lacks some of the mo
Hello all,
I'm a contributor to the Wine project. To summarize the following mail,
Wine needs special versions of some of its normal dependencies, such as
libfreetype and libgnutls, built using the MinGW cross-compiler, and I'm
sending out a mail to major distributions in order to get some fee
On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 12:42, Zebediah Figura wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm a contributor to the Wine project. To summarize the following mail,
> Wine needs special versions of some of its normal dependencies, such as
> libfreetype and libgnutls, built using the MinGW cross-compiler, and I'm
> sen
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210901.0):
ID: 966786 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/966786
ID: 966788 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree
* Zebediah Figura:
> (2) If we use dynamic libraries, should dependencies be included in
> the main wine package, or packaged separately?
Aren't many of them already packages separately? For example
mingw32-libpng and mingw32-gnutls?
Thanks,
Florian
_
On 9/2/21 12:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Zebediah Figura:
(2) If we use dynamic libraries, should dependencies be included in
the main wine package, or packaged separately?
Aren't many of them already packages separately? For example
mingw32-libpng and mingw32-gnutls?
Thanks, I wasn't a
Hi,
In https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-7558b7e7fc I
received a message from bodhi:
"""
This update's test gating status has been changed to 'failed'.
"""
However, no tests actually failed yet, and the gating status is
adjusted to "waiting" immediately after.
This is a r
On 9/2/21 11:54 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 12:42, Zebediah Figura wrote:
Hello all,
I'm a contributor to the Wine project. To summarize the following mail,
Wine needs special versions of some of its normal dependencies, such as
libfreetype and libgnutls, built usin
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 12:11:43PM -0500, Zebediah Figura (she/her) wrote:
> On 9/2/21 12:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Zebediah Figura:
> >
> > > (2) If we use dynamic libraries, should dependencies be included in
> > > the main wine package, or packaged separately?
> >
> > Aren't many of t
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 12:11:43PM -0500, Zebediah Figura (she/her) wrote:
> On 9/2/21 12:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Zebediah Figura:
> >
> > > (2) If we use dynamic libraries, should dependencies be included in
> > > the main wine package, or packaged separately?
> >
> > Aren't many of t
Sorry for double-posting, my mail client helpfully removed everything
from CC for me :-(
On 9/2/21 12:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 12:11:43PM -0500, Zebediah Figura (she/her) wrote:
On 9/2/21 12:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Zebediah Figura:
(2) If we use dynami
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 12:46:09PM -0500, Zebediah Figura (she/her) wrote:
> Sorry for double-posting, my mail client helpfully removed everything from
> CC for me :-(
>
> On 9/2/21 12:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 12:11:43PM -0500, Zebediah Figura (she/her) wrote:
>
On Thu 2 Sep 2021, 18:27 Michael Catanzaro, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-7558b7e7fc I
> received a message from bodhi:
>
> """
> This update's test gating status has been changed to 'failed'.
> """
>
> However, no tests actually failed yet, and the gatin
On Thu, Sep 2 2021 at 07:49:29 PM +0100, Leigh Griffin
wrote:
Gating is optional so it shouldn't be causing an issue directly for
those who haven't opted in
I believe this is incorrect, it's now required for critical path
packages. Otherwise it wouldn't be running at all, because I don't
bel
On Tue, 2021-08-31 at 17:25 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> ntfs-3g 2021.8.22 was released yesterday to resolve multiple CVEs[1].
> With permission from Tom Callaway (the ntfs-3g maintainer), I am
> preparing updates for Fedora and EPEL now for Tom.
>
> As part of this, I'll rebuild all r
On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 13:54 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2 2021 at 07:49:29 PM +0100, Leigh Griffin
> wrote:
> > Gating is optional so it shouldn't be causing an issue directly for
> > those who haven't opted in
>
> I believe this is incorrect, it's now required for critical pa
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 8:40 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 13:54 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 2 2021 at 07:49:29 PM +0100, Leigh Griffin
> > wrote:
> > > Gating is optional so it shouldn't be causing an issue directly for
> > > those who haven't opted in
> >
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 4:08 PM Leigh Griffin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 8:40 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 13:54 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 2 2021 at 07:49:29 PM +0100, Leigh Griffin
>> > wrote:
>> > > Gating is optional so it shouldn't be
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 9:13 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 4:08 PM Leigh Griffin wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 8:40 PM Adam Williamson <
>> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 13:54 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Sep 2 2021 at
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 11:23 AM Leigh Griffin wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Just a quick mail to let folks know that from October 1st, the CPE team
> will be working towards supporting the EPEL community. We just posted a
> quick comm blog on it [1] and wanted to raise wider awareness on the devel
>
On 9/2/21 1:04 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 12:46:09PM -0500, Zebediah Figura (she/her) wrote:
Sorry for double-posting, my mail client helpfully removed everything from
CC for me :-(
On 9/2/21 12:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 12:11:43PM -050
On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 16:38 +, Nils K wrote:
> 7 years later I find this and was surprised after switching from
> Debian/Ubuntu.
> I cannot find the source or any licensing information for current
> versions however there are several alternatives.
> One which is already in the repos is pdf-stap
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 3:38 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-08-31 at 17:25 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > ntfs-3g 2021.8.22 was released yesterday to resolve multiple CVEs[1].
> > With permission from Tom Callaway (the ntfs-3g maintainer), I am
> > preparing updates for F
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 6:38 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 3:38 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2021-08-31 at 17:25 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > ntfs-3g 2021.8.22 was released yesterday to resolve multiple CVEs[1].
> > > With permission from Tom
I've been using LXQT on my rasp3+ since f33 and even forgot
I successfully upgraded to f34 on 03/24/21, but can't find
an f34 image. Is there an image available for f34 and will
one be made available for f35?
Joe
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fe
49 matches
Mail list logo
